User talk:Nikola Smolenski

Previous talk archived at /Archive 1, /Archive 2, /Archive 3. Nikola 20:42, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a little on your Wikimedia Data Extension discussion page and would be very interested in some guidence how to to pursue my goals (of using your plugin on a website or starting a WikiDB project). Sorry if this is a duiplicate notification, just wanna be sure you notice! :) ThanksSupaiku (talk) 09:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the section because its base largely on an informal lecture by a researcher at my college. I was emailed afterwards by him asking me to remove the section because the research is as yet unpublished. I didn't realize that when I posted the section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kablamo2007 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia: proving the Web's freedom of space and How much paper would it take to print out Wikipedia? cite you as a reliable source for the amount paper it would take to print out Wikipedia. Interesting that they didn't cited the article Wikipedia:Size of Wikipedia. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 15:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm sorry, I'll link that page prominently from the image description page. Nikola 20:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to be sorry about. It is good news that someone thinks enough of your efforts to quote you as a reliable source. Congrats! -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 01:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding this, I just sent you an email. -- phoebe/(talk) 01:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've assessed the article Ala (Hala), would you be so kind to inform me about the weaknesses you've found in it? (Talk) VVVladimir 10:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep undoing my edits? Those men are Croats,and if you have problem with that go somewhere else —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.172.234.178 (talk) 16:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC) and edited to remove personal attacks by Jitse Niesen (talk) 03:34, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Здраво Никола! Сврати чешће на страницу својих разговора на српској Википедији. Одличну ствар си направио на Викизворнику. Пробај још само убацити -{ове}- тагове тако важне код уређивања текста због транслитерације. И ако можеш видети шта је са страницом "МедијаВики:Tagline". Не раазумем зашто се не види порука на насловној страни и др. Оне знамените Србе муслимане сам постављам, само стављам текстове под више имена (Бан, Смарт, Фердо). Бан са Викизворника. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.131.24.6 (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bn matica e.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look here you stinking Serb! Don't promote your propaganda in our article! There were never, during the entire war and now in the post-war period, any links between Albanian institutions or the KLA and the Mujahideen fighters. They are a group of volunteers who go to different countries with a majority of Islam religion to help the war! Maybe in Kosovo there were a few, but they were never supported and/or associated with the Kosovo Liberation Army! They weren't grouped appropriately, so they can not even be classified as fighting forces. If they came to fight, they weren't regarded as defenders of ethnic Albanians, they came to fight Serbs because of their religion. Besides, they were more frequent in Bosnia, not Kosovo. The sources that you provide are only allegations. You can't base this article on allegations. You're even citing extremely nationalistic Serbian propaganda website like http://www.kosovo.net! Don't be ridiculous. If you want a debate, bring it on. But don't use this article as a stage to build your propaganda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bardhylius (talk • contribs) 15:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Temple_of_Saint_Sava_-_liturgy.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Temple_of_Saint_Sava's_bells.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Saint_Sava's_plateau.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola, I've addressed the issues that you raised at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Quneitra‎ concerning the article on Quneitra. I'd be grateful if you could review my comments and the changes I've made in response to your suggestions. -- ChrisO 22:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further review, I stand corrected on this point. -- GABaker 14:24 11 October 2007. —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 14:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel compeled to respond and provide facts with regards to your lies about alleged Serb victims of Jasenovac camp. Even the United States Holocaust Museum has intervened to respond to lies about alleged 700,000 to 1.5 million Serb victims in Jasenovac camp. These lies have been discredited even by Belgrade sources. Serb editors have conveniently "avoided" reporting the following figure from the United States Holocaust Museum about Serb victims of Jasenovac: "The most reliable figures place the number of Serbs killed by the Ustaša between 330,000 and 390,000, with 45,000 to 52,000 Serbs murdered in Jasenovac." Serb editors have deleted this part from the article because it's more convenient to believe in a myth and inventions (lies) of 700,000 Serbs dead even though the United States Holocaust museum has stated that the most reliable figures place the number of Serbs killed in Jasenovac to 45,000-52,000. Source http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/jasenovac/frameset.html?L= . The Bosniak Institute in Zürich published in 1998 a list of all registered victims of the two concentration camps on the basis of data drawn from the Office for Statistics in Belgrade. This gives a figure of 59,188 known deaths at Jasenovac and Stara Gradiška, of which 33,944 were Serbs. You see, your lies have been already discredited. There is nothing you can do about the truth. Lie is always weak, so better stick to facts. And of course, you never mentioned over 1,000 Bosniaks killed in Jasenovac and over 100,000 Bosniaks killed by Chetniks who collaborated with Nazis and murdered Jews and Bosniaks. Bosniak 21:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't claimed any of things you claim I have. I explained why USHMM isn't very good source. Your other claims are nonsense. Nikola 18:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ala (demon) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Ala (demon) for things needed to be addressed. Victor12 01:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's actually a good idea, thanks for notifying me about it. Where can I see more information about adding the articles through a bot?

Initially I was actually going to expand these articles myself, particularly villages in Uzice's municipality. I didn't create any other village articles outside of Uzice.

Thanks and take care,

--Bolonium 20:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the History of Modern Kosovo article. It's unendingly POV. It says that during Yugoslavia over 80% were Albanians, but their number fell because of Serb colonization - even though the censuses state ~65%. Most of the article relies on crimes against Albanians - but (like in WWII) atrocities on Serbs are nowhere mentioned. --PaxEquilibrium 23:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a secret? ;) --Bolonium 20:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you can even choose the selected articles and all that in advance, and have it rotated per month automatically. --Bolonium 20:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I was talking about earlier, except I didn't implement it. Nice that you did. --Bolonium 17:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never go the answer from you - what sympathetic do find among them? --PaxEquilibrium 21:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand - what sympathetic do who find about whom? Nikola 21:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You told me you're a sympathizer of the SRS. --PaxEquilibrium 21:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall I ever told you so. Why are you asking me that in this exact moment? Nikola 04:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, on my very talk page - you said that you're not quite a nationalist, but just that you have some sympathies with them (some year and a half ago or so).

I'm asking you because I always wanted but never got to. --PaxEquilibrium 10:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find that. If you think you can, be my guest.

So, you remember what I told you a year and a half ago, during all that time wanted to ask me about it, but don't do so until the very moment when Chris started a campaign to have me banned for opposing his POV pushing? Nikola 11:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yeah... --PaxEquilibrium 11:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, right. This google search also proves you wrong. Nikola 11:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? What has User:Elephantus got to do with me? The two of us even didn't get along quite well. --PaxEquilibrium 11:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Following your latest bout of edit warring on Gazimestan speech and repeated attempts to delete the non-Serbian POV from the article, I've come to the conclusion that you have no intention of respecting either WP:NPOV or the existing article probation. I've refrained from reporting your repeated breaches of article probation until now, but your latest actions have convinced me that you are seeking to use Wikipedia as a soapbox for your POV. I've requested enforcement action against you at WP:AE#Enforcement request re Kosovo. -- ChrisO 23:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your nomination, and your valuable edits and suggestions on Ala (demon). Keep up the good work! Vlado 23:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your list of scientific journals in Serbia was nominated for deletion on 2007-11-02. You might be interested in the AfD discussion here which already has 2 "votes" for Delete and 1 for Keep. It would be helpful if you can reply to each of the main objections:
1. The list still contains too many red links,
2. The list does not have any reliable sources about the journals,
3. Category:Serbian magazines already exists (but only for the journals in your list with blue links),
4. The list is too broad (too many different subjects),
5. The list is too specific to only one country (Serbia) - Neparis 19:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

This is just to inform you, that I have done a suggestion for some extension to the Data-Extension on Mediawiki. Have a look at mw:Extension_talk:Data.

--141.2.138.89 16:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kosovska River requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Stewy⁵⁷¹⁴talk 20:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Gazimestan speech. For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 01:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the whole history here, but from looking at the RFM and the recent edits to that article, I'd generally agree with Chris O's last edit comment. The guiding principle is WP:NPOV, and more importantly its first section, WP:NOPOV. Thus, PR shouldn't be deleting your sources and at the same time you shouldn't be deleting his, although your latest version does better present both points of view textually, AFAICT. I apologize for PR'ss bunker mentality here; I'll have a word with him. -- Kendrick7^talk 18:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia did not occupied and annexed Montenegro. Some Montenegrins rose in the rebellion - not all. The 2006 referendum was unconstitutional, held in undemocratic conditions, and even then had to be forged to succeed. Nikola 10:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

What do I hear about the West wanting Kosovo independent because it would be pro-Western, but refuses independence to other small nations because they'd be pro-Russian? PR^talk 18:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nikola, I wrote the italian article about Riblja čorba and Van Gogh and would like to add some pictures, if you have some could you upload them on Commons? The existing pictures on the english article can only be used on the english Wikipedia so I need someone esle to upload them first (I would do it myself but I have none). --Munifico (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Здраво, Никола. Не знам ко се од наших википедијаца бави учешћем Србије у 1. св. рату и балканским ратовима, али пошто си како видим веома активан ево обраћам се теби. Пар бугарских википедијаца (нарочито User: Gligan), који очигледно не могу да прежале што су изгубили те ратове пишу често бајке о бугарској војсци по страницама иѕ те тематике. Пример: на страници Battle of Doiran су дуго стајали, како се испоставило, ДЕСЕТОСТРУКО ВЕЋИ губици Грка и Британаца све док се није појавио један корисник са јаким извором и коначно исфорсирао тренутне бројеве. Воле да посећују и странице које имају везе и са Србијом и да лупетају да су нпр. 1915. разбили бројнију и надмоћну (?!) српску војску. Праве и идиотске странице kao што је Battle of Morava и пуне их измишљотинама. У почетку ми се учинило да су момци ОК али сам сад убеђен да су или у питању клинци-вандали или неки националистички провокатори. Немам довољно времена да постанем фул-тајм википедијац и не знам много људи овде, па те молим да обратиш пажњу на њих.

Поштовање

Вељко Стевановић 22. 11. 2007

Поздрав брате Србине! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.253.16 (talk) 08:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bn matica e.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 18:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing the Template:WikiProject Europe on Kosovo articles ? Is there any agreement on this , or are you just removing them because you dont think they should be there ( if this is the case please put them back or disscus it first on the talk page ). please answer me on my talk page--B.C. 18:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why Kosovo cities should have it is because Kosovo is not completly part of Serbia and therefor cant be completly on the scoope of WikiProject Serbia , but since there isnt a WikiProject Kosovo , the WikiProject Europe should be displayed instead. If you want to change that I'd suggest opening a disscution on Talk:Kosovo .Until then , I would appreciate if you could put them back --B.C. 18:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what I mean , not under serbian administration--B.C. 18:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look , what I am trying to tell you is that Kosovo is under the adiministration of UNMIK and not serbia , that is why it isnt completly part of Serbia --B.C. 18:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I shall, thanks... I couldn't get to it earlier with examinations, among other things in the way... Take care, --Bolonium (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As a Serb Wikipedian are you aware that there is absolutely no mention of Ustasha crimes in the List of war crimes?

Something needs to be done. Unfortunately I am not in a position to do so, but I submit it for your consideration. Spread the word. 216.194.20.252 (talk) 22:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might like to know that I've (re)started Wikipedia:WikiProject Kosovo to help coordinate editing and facilitate monitoring of Kosovo-related articles. I will be sponsoring the project. If you have any queries about it, please ask me on my talk page or use Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kosovo.

If you wish to become involved, please feel free to do so -<script type="text/javascript" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:VoABot/adminlist.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:VoABot/botlist.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Voice of All/Dates.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Voice of All/monobook/parse.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script> simply leave your username at Wikipedia:WikiProject Kosovo#Participants. One feature that you may find particularly useful is the public watchlist. If you click here you can see all the recent changes to articles listed on the watchlist.

There is still a lot of work to be done on getting the project off the ground, so your help would be welcomed. In particular:

• The public watchlist needs to be populated with all Kosovo-related articles (and redirects), categories, images and templates. I've added as many as I've found so far but more need to be added.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Kosovo#Recognized content and Wikipedia:WikiProject Kosovo#Formerly ecognized content need to be populated.

If you can help out with these, it would be much appreciated.

-- ChrisO (talk) 23:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bioce train disaster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One people moves in and steals it from another tribe. It happens... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.224.28.2 (talk) 13:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cradel --Andrija (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to find sources about the origin of Kosovo's name. Could you please help?

Here's a draft I wrote:

The region seems to take its name from Kosovo Polje (Fushë Kosovë in Albanian]), 8 km north of Pristina, where a battle known by the same name was fought in 1389 and became a symbol to the Serbian resistance against the Ottoman invasion in the Balkans. In Serbian language Kosovo Polje (Косово Поље) means literally "Blackbird's Field" (or "Blackbird's Plain"), where kosovo is the declined possessive form of Kos(Кос) "Blackbird", that is "of the Blackbird" in Serbian. Thus, the name shows a Serbian origin and has no proper meaning in Albanian language, where fushë translates to "Field", but Kosovë has no proper meanings, and "blackbird" translates to Çavë in Albanian.

Thanks in advance and best of all, --Piero Montesacro (talk) 18:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. I'd be interested in investigate to which extent it could be argued that most toponyms in Kosovo are Slavic in essence, i.e. Peć and that their Albanian versions are just translations made upon assonance and not upon meaning. Again my thanks and best of all. --Piero Montesacro (talk) 11:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are saying that niether serbia nor kosovo should be mentioned then how come you are instead listing both ?
Kosovo as a province and serbia as the country--Cradel 13:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, look at these comments:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Andrija.b#Don.27t_disrupt_articles, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ArberBorici#Neutral_point_of_view . --Andrija (talk) 13:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I have no opinion about the Kosovo's independence or not, and I understand the Serbians people point of view , so I have removed the Kosovo borders. You can reconsider your vote if you want.
Sémhur 10:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at the list and see if you like my additions. They may need to be protected. 216.194.3.204 (talk) 04:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, zvecan, should it be 98% serb, 10 000 izbeglica as you people call them, those internally displaced, 72% sounds incorrect, as all books and sources confirm it's 99% serb populated. I will not touch it, since i am not sure if those people will stay there, but majority will. What will happen to strpce area? can it work alone? George

Today I prepared around 8 gallons (16 liters) of sauerkraut using the methods passed down from my German ancestors (see a good description in the first sentences at Sauerkraut#Container. You created a Commons category on sour cabbage preparation. It appears to be a variant from the method that I used. We chop the cabbage into tiny slices with a cabbage shreader and compress the salted result. Then we put a glass container and weight over the result in a crock. I took pictures of the process as things progressed. How different are the two methods: different enough that I should upload my pictures? What is sour cabbage? I am watching your talk page, so please respond here at your talkpage. Royalbroil 19:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I intended to make an illustrated guide to making sauerkraut on Wikibooks one day... It is similar, though people here are usually pickling entire cabbage heads (shredded cabbage is sometimes put in addition to the heads). Feel free to upload your picture, of course, you don't need my permission. Sour cabbage is simply a synonym for sauercraut. Nikola (talk) 07:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sk200307.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Resolved. -- ChrisO (talk) 00:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At present the material you have re-inserted reads "The International Court of Justice [5] in 1997 found acts of genocide against Serbs had been incited by...." This is inaccurate and misleading. The reference we have says no such thing. Please work for accuracy in WP. Just because I made a mistake and misled readers over this material is no reason for you to do so too.

WP:NOR - "Information in an article must be verifiable in the references cited."

Please either re-write the introducing sentence, bring another source to the article or delete the material. SmithBlue (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC) If you disagree with my view on this please discuss at Talk:Serbophobia.[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:500000000000 dinars.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I fixed this. Best. GregManninLB (talk) 09:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had posted a request here, where I asked for a scrip that would allow me to find categories such as Category:WikiProject Biography non-article pages where "non-article" appears other than at the beginning of the category name. That lead me to grep.php. According to this, a Nikola Smolenski wrote grep.php. I'm hoping that you are that Nikola Smolenski. Can you modify the existing grep tool with an option to show all category titles that match a regular expression pattern? Alternatively, can you create and post a tool that shows all category titles that match a regular expression pattern? Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 08:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's good news! Is there a way (without too much effort on your part) to expand grep to include options for separately searching each of the Wikipedia prefixes (e.g., Wikipedia:, Template:, Category:, User:, MediaWiki:, Help:, Portal:, etc.) in addition to article space. For example, if I wanted to search Category: prefixes for the regular expression pattern "school", I would select Category:, enter "school", and have my answer. If so, please do. If not, that's OK. Thanks! GregManninLB (talk) 16:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be a pest, but (i) what about the abilty to search up to three regular expression patterns? Some people recreate deleted articles under similar, but different names. For example, if the article John Smith is delete, they may recreate it as John J. Smith. The ability to search Wikipedia prefixes for those having "John" and "Smith" in them (two separate regular expression patterns) would be most helpful. (ii) If you can make the default language as English instead of Afar, that would help. (iii) An option to exclude redirects would be most welcome. (They have a hide redirect option that can be seen here) Thanks! GregManninLB (talk) 17:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.[1] I'll use that in the future. GregManninLB (talk) 17:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Nikola. Thanks for the changes. I noticed that Template:IPSummary, Template:Coor dms (through Template:Coor URL), Template:Coor title dms (through Template:Coor dms]]), Template:User edits, and Template:User contrib use tools.wikimedia.de programs. If you have the time, would you include grep in an easy to use template. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nikola. Would you please add Portal and Portal talk to the Grep Namespace pull down menu. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please lock the page? The problem is that some people in Bulgaria choose to ignore the fact that it wa a decisive Serbian (and to a degree Montenegrin) victory in spite of both logic and neutral sources.

Veljko Stevnovich —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.137.119.113 (talk) 01:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, it would be better if you would stop vandalising the Kosovo related pages. I know you oposse Kosovo independence but thats the truth and belive me the truth can hurt but stop vandalising. Illyrium —Preceding comment was added at 20:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have gotten no help over on meta with some trouble I'm having with your Poem extension, as installed on my own personal wiki. On the talk pages of other namespaces it makes an error - UNIQ583c33685170dbcd-poem-00000000-QINU? - (example). It is also fairly incompatible with the Semantic Mediawiki extension, since it makes the fact box right after the closing of the Poem (example). I don't know the mediawiki framework well enough to know why either of these might be. Do you have any ideas? --Aquatiki (talk) 07:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello !

I'm contacting you about mw:extension:interlanguage. I myself recently wrote an extension dealing with interlanguages, mw:Extension:PromotedInterlanguages. The idea is to get rid of those nasty javascript hacks we use to display the golden star next to interlanguage links, as it is responsible for nearly half of the loading time on pages with a lot of interlanguage links.

I received good feedback on it, but got mainly answered "that would be nice if it was using a centralized system". Now these people were thinking at a separate database to flag featured/good articles, but looking at your extension, I think that we could maybe merge these together, what do you think ?

A small difference between our extensions is that mine needs to disable the parser cache when evaluating my #promoted tag : the only aim of my parser function is in fact to fill a local array, to know which link has to be "higlighted", and this array must be filled on each display. And here, for your code, disabling the cache does not make any sense, since it would retrieve the centralized page on each display.

I think that adding categories on the central wiki (e.g. "Category:English featured article") would be sufficient to generate the data to display the stars (making the api query "prop=categories|langlinks" instead of "prop=langlinks"), but there is that cache issue. The first idea that I have here (and that might be a bad one) would be to change your InterlanguageExtension to return, not only a list of interlanguage links, but also some "#promoted" tags. The value returned would still be cached by the parser (i.e. the API query would not be done at each time), but since the cached value would contain the #promoted tag, these tags would be parsed on each time, and it would display correctly the promoted interlanguage links.

Please tell me your thoughts on this :)

NicDumZ ~ 11:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:University of Priština logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just found your chart, as well as your grep tool: very nice! I'd be interested in having another go at generating this sort of chart, and seeing how that grey space can be minimised. I take it that proportions involved are number of articles: over what namespace? What regexes did you use? Dsp13 (talk) 09:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I find your grep toolserver tool very convenient for some tasks. It would be very nice if:

• there was option to show redirects only
• redirects would point to URLs with ...?redirect=no
• language select had ar, bg, ... codes (otherwise we're forced to look into HTML source)
• there was a link to some wiki page with description (or at least to your user page)

Thank you in advance. —AlexSm 20:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vote to delete or keep this article here [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.39.144.157 (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that you are interested in topics related to Holocaust of Serbs in WWII and the neonazism manifestations of pro-ustashe Croats in present day Croatia. I would like to draw your attention to persistent holocaust denial POV pushing going on some pages, like Jasenovac i Gradiska stara (removal of quotes, facts), or Ljubo Milos (removal of references) etc. It would be good if you could help resolve these issues that get maligned by some very persistent holocaust deniers/Croatian chauvinistic vandals/serbhaters. Mozart1783 (talk) 23:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This genius is our good old banned User:PaxEquilibrium which until now has created 60 puppets confirmed by checkuser. In my thinking he is having mental breakdown because I can't understand that somebody will write this to himself. If nothing else we now know many of his old puppets from 2005 or even 2003 (user:Joka)

About his help demands it is enough for you to read Wikipedia:Quotations section When not to use quotations--Rjecina (talk) 23:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that Rjecina is the one with mental problems, paranoic user who accuses users of being socks of PaxEquilibrium, who has nothing to do with this. But it is hopeless to argue with someone as delusional. Mozart1783 (talk) 23:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aleksei Leonov - Near the Moon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your articles about mythology! I will try to translate this new about Psohlav and Dukljan. It is very good work! Have a nice day, Yours Svajcr --85.207.18.54 (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

What is the status of your language extension? I liked it a lot. Do you know whether it is going to be implemented in Wikipedia? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 17:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Visual gallery of toucans, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ako te interesuje Srbija, makse se crnogorskih tema. Himna je napisania crnogorskim jezikom. -Rave92

And it sure wasn't written in Serbian language. -Rave92

I really liked your Interlanguage Extension and didn't know whether anyone actually plans to enable it in Wikipedia, so i decided to be bold and filed a request for it in Bugzilla:

• https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15607

I hope that this is the right thing to do if i want this to go forward.

Your comments are welcome. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nikola. I created a visual gallery of toucans here. Please consider adding Image:Toucan, S. Alessio.JPG and Image:Toco Toucan.jpg to an article. -- Suntag ☼ 17:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note on my talk page. I came around in my thinking on this. There are field guides to birds and other animals, so they seem to be a viable format for an encyclopedia. I have a book on clouds that mostly is photos to help identify the differences. I think a topic like that might be a viable encyclopedia article. However, I think people are concerned of seeing Visual guide to Pokémon and Visual guide to wrestlers. I posted some resources on this issue at Visual gallery of toucans DRV. -- Suntag ☼ 18:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For some information that may be relevant, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower gallery, Wikipedia:Galleries, Wikipedia:Gallery namespace, Wikipedia:Meetup/Gallery, Category:Wikipedia image galleries, Wikipedia:WikiProject Cats/Gallery, Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs/Gallery, and Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/galleries. -- Suntag ☼ 18:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you have uploaded images about the size of wikipedia, but it hasn't been updated recently. It would be interesting just to see how big Wikipedia is now. Would you think about making a new image? Vinson 02:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I kindly ask you to participate in the discussion about Zadar article recent history section in order to achieve a more NPOV version. I feel that current version is one sided and has issues that need to be resolved. Thank you. 78.30.150.253 (talk) 13:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new AfD opened up at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual gallery of toucans. You might want to get your best arguments together and post them to the AfD. Usually, those who post sooner have more influence over the discussion than those who post later. Best. -- Suntag ☼ 22:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eto što si pokrenuo. Cenzuru. Dok sve (i do "najmanjih") gadosti šta su Srbi napravili u ratovima stoje u raznoraznim člancima, ti igraš njihovu igru i mičeš ovo. Kolko god ja prepravljivao, Šipci će se pozivat na tvoj edit. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 17:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

• Image:Vinca_A.png
• Image:Vinca_B.png
• Image:Vinca_CH.png
• Image:Vinca_D.png
• Image:Vinca_DH.png
• Image:Vinca_E.png
• Image:Vinca_F.png
• Image:Vinca_G.png
• Image:Vinca_H.png
• Image:Vinca_I.png
• Image:Vinca_K.png
• Image:Vinca_L.png
• Image:Vinca_M.png
• Image:Vinca_N.png
• Image:Vinca_O.png
• Image:Vinca_P.png
• Image:Vinca_Q.png
• Image:Vinca_R.png
• Image:Vinca_S.png
• Image:Vinca_SH.png
• Image:Vinca_ST.png
• Image:Vinca_T.png
• Image:Vinca_TH.png
• Image:Vinca_U.png
• Image:Vinca_V.png
• Image:Vinca_Z.png

Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 02:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just read you proposal at meta:A newer look at the interlanguage link, and I totally agree with it. Could you tell me if there have been any progress in the implementation of this system? Thank you. Eklipse (talk) 05:37, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just registered and voted for this bug :-) But, I see that the proposal is ignored mostly because there's not enough support, and I noticed that there haven't been further discussion at the Meta page since september. Do you think a message at the Village Pump would give it a boost? Eklipse (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A thread in which your recent edits to Šar Mountains are discussed has been started here. Aramgar (talk) 23:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Nikola, I've just put a proposal at meta:Talk:A newer look at the interlanguage link. Your input is welcome. Eklipse (talk) 20:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. If you remember some time ago there was an issue with the Krajina town catory. We have yet another problem and another vote as some Croats are not happy with this topic existing. Please add a vote or some input. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Towns_in_the_Former_RSK Thanks. (LAz17 (talk) 19:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Perhaps you might be able to help in some way with this new article... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_the_Former_Republic_of_Serbian_Krajina It can be improved a little. If you could make it look better or have any ideas about how to make it better please help out. (LAz17 (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Hi Nikola. Thanks for uploading Image:Vinca "M".jpg. Unfortunately the jagged edges are rather nasty. Do you suppose you could upload the uncropped image so that I can have a go at editing it? -- ChrisO (talk) 00:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice arguments on the talk page :) --GOD OF JUSTICE 18:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am changing as this anthem isn't the same like first, and therefore current is written in Montenegrin language. Also, offical language in Montenegro is Montenegrin, and all article considering Montenegro should be in that language. If you want "Serbian" go to Serbian articles and you will have it. We didn't separated from you so you can still copy our history, and to make all Serbian. Serbian is just language in use same like Albanian. If you are that brave, why don't you edit Croatian articles if you are that brave, as they are written in Serbian language by your theory :). Go edit "Lijepa Nađa", I can expect from you argument about census. The same was with Serbo-Croatian in Serbia 1991, in use of Serbo-Croatian, but now... it is all Serbian in Serbia :D. Same will be for Montenegrin, when you won't find job as teacher of Serbian language in Montenegro :D.

Rave92 (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rave, placing 'Montenegrin language' in articles poses as a problem. This is because Montenegrin only exists on paper and not factually as a language itself but more or less as a near-separate dialect of the Serbian language (actually two dialects if you want to be specific). And what you think is the Montenegrin language won't be for long, trust me.

P.S. Stop provocating users to commit stupid tasks to show their "pride" in the Serbian language. --Prevalis (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say it isn't written in Montenegrin language. Plitics made that it was called Serbian, but Montenegrin isn't dilct of that language. It can only be dialect of Serbo-Croatian, which doesn't exsist anymore. Isn't different from today's Serbian? So? That means it should be written in Serbian? Why? it doesn't have status of official language.

Rave92 (talk) 22:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't quite get what you were saying. Serbo-Croatian dialect of Serbian? Anyway all articles and names are in Montenegrin, as the offical language is in Montenegrin. We all know that all is the same language (Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian and Montenegrin) but when all wanna named by country, Montenegro has same right, or even more, and don't see how it is your problem. It is one language, but every country has it own name, and in Montenegro that name is Montenegrin :). Rave92 (talk) 20:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kosovo and Metohia population structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 22:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mobilic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any input here would be much appreciated... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:Bih_1991.jpg (LAz17 (talk) 01:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Uklonio sam reference iz jednog prostog razloga: Tir na n'Og odavno nije "najperspektivniji domaci bend bez albuma" (imaju album zar ne?)... To je neko pre mene vec predlozio na talk pageu, i ja se apsolutno slazem s njim. Uvodi na clancima bi trebalo da u kratkim crtama daju najosnovnije informacije o predmetu clanka, a to sto je jedan rok kriticar rekao o bednu tesko da moze biti toliko vazno... Mozda bi ova informacija mogla da se nadje negde unutar clanka? Ostalocutanje (talk)

Dobro, ako je u cilju ocuvanja clanka... Ostalocutanje (talk)

great job on Size of English Wikipedia in August 2007.svg Spencerk (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Šarplaninac. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. seicer | talk | contribs 17:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Видим да је чланак у чијој дебати о останку си и ти учествовао је поново номинован за брисање из истих разлога [3] Како ја видим ту је и српски чланак са свим неопходних референцама и независним изворима који потврдђују све наводе Ternit (talk) 13:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Molim te, obrati pažnju na par članaka, imam problema sa nekim idiotom, vidi u history!

To su:

Ulpiana, Pančić's Peak‎, Šarplaninac‎, Đeravica‎, Šar Mountains‎.

Ne znam kome još da se obratim, ali vidi, zamolio bih za watch, kada nas je više, neće moći baš tako lako! Hvala puno, unapred!!

Tadija (talk) 15:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola, molim te reci neku lepu reč za ovu promenu...

Talk:Tromegja,_peak

Hvala, pozz, Tadija (talk) 22:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola, I have requested that the paragraph is fixed, and made suggestions. You've left me an explanation, but that isn't the same thing as actually fixing the problem. If you actually know what these buildings are, then you fix the problem! It's not for me to track down the info and correct what you have written badly. For a start, you needs to fix the very first word of the paragraph, which begins "It" . What is "it"? Are you talking about Saint' Sava's? If so, begin the section that way. And make sure your reader knows that you are talking about a historic tradition, not a tram "line". Amandajm (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I reverted your note that the article's factual accuracy is disputed. My explanation was: "The last comment on the talk page is from July 2007;many disputable assertions are referenced or deleted,yet;It would be better, to mark disputable assretions in the article with citation request". Maybe I am wrong, but I want to contribute for improving this article and therefore, I will be gratefull, if you point which exactly are your doubts. Regards,--Males (talk) 15:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I made some new edits; I added references and I'm ready to add more sources. I red again carefully your words in the talk page and I maintain that the most of your objections are missing in the article now or they are referenced. I hope that if you have some requests for sources or other concrete objections you'll express them in the talk page or you'll put the relevant templates in the text.--Males (talk) 01:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are into edit war too, my friend. I won't allow for you to leave it as Serbian, and don't see why I am the one that is the only edit wars. Edit your country articles, leave our. We didn't get independent so you can tell us what we call, how to call language or how to think. Bye Rave92 (talk) 18:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

24h for edit warring; you know where William M. Connolley (talk) 22:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]