User talk:NotARealWord

Archives

1

I just asked for a blanket of any page I wrote that was deleted to be userfied. Not that it's any of your business, but no, I don't think the Mutants will ever be notable. What's your problem? Mathewignash (talk) 19:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a participant who has voiced an opinion over at the TF WikiProject about proposals to change the article formats, a set out proposal has been provided and as a participant in the overall discussions, your agreement or disagreement in regards to them is required, if you so wish to provide an answer. Link to proposals here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Transformers#What_the_proposal_actually_is Mabuska ^(talk) 19:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm writing this to both NotARealWord and Rossami. You two were the primary participants in the above RFD a while back. It sat lingering open, but I have finally closed it, as "Retarget to Overcast (disambiguation)". I am not knowledgeable enough on the subject to implement the second half of the consensus your two reached, namely to update Overcast (disambiguation) with the different characters. Could one or the other of you two please do this, as you both seem to have knowledge on the subject. - TexasAndroid (talk) 18:58, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, screw it. I can't think of any which are completely appropriate. Still notgonna be active, though, just have no idea what notice to use. NotARealWord (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I closed the AfD for the article per WP:SK because your nomination didn't actually ask for deletion, and AfD is only for nominating an article for deletion. However that should not mean that the article can't be turned into a redirect. My suggestion is to talk things over with a couple of other people who are active with Transformers articles, like Mathewignash, Khajidha, JIP, Grapple X, Mabuska, Fortdj33, etc. All of those editors have worked with Transformers articles and have participated at WP:TRANSFORMERS, are currently active on Wikipedia, and may be responsive to a discussion. If nothing else, you can try simply leaving a message on the talk page of the article, saying that you propose to turn it into a redirect, wait for a day, and if nobody objects then just go ahead and do it. If someone reverts your change, no problem, just engage that person in discussion. If anyone is overly hostile to your suggestions or actions, let me know and I'll try to see that you're treated fairly. I just wanted to make sure that my closure of the AfD wasn't perceived as an attempt to shut down your attempt to turn the article into a redirect, it really wasn't. -- Atama頭 00:50, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - I have no real objection to a redirect to the page you proposed as long as any useful information is merged first. No need for a deletion nomination. If no one else has any objections, go ahead and do it. Mathewignash (talk) 01:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]