User talk:Oranjelo100

This is Oranjelo100's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your input. In the future please make use of the Show preview feature instead of saving each individual change when making several minor changes.2601:1:9C80:82:D5F6:571C:57CC:BB49 (talk) 04:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several months on, I agree with the above. Do you need help to find what we are talking about? – Fayenatic London 22:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Intel Core i7 microprocessors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to TXT

List of Intel Xeon microprocessors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ECC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my edit comments. This is wikipedia and no marketing organisation. Please find the blank key on your keyboard and use it where appropriate. DrSeehas (talk) 07:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Hello, I'm Faizan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of AMD Accelerated Processing Unit microprocessors, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Faizan 08:34, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emperor-Overlord100! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ATX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Comparison of CPU architectures may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• superscalar,up to 8mb lv3 cache(mainstream),up to 20mb lv3 cache(Extreme),Virtualization,[CISC]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again: Please find the space bar on your keyboard and use it where appropriate. --DrSeehas (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emperor-Overlord100. You recently added a number of internal links to Comparison of CPU architectures. Unfortunately, most of these links go to disambiguation pages, not to the articles you had in mind. Please check the links and correct them to ensure they point to the relevant page, or else remove the links. I have added a template to help with this. Click on "fix" in purple banner at the top of the page to access a helpful external site, Dabsolver. Cnilep (talk) 05:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if you continue to omit blanks and add "DAB links" in your edits, I will revert your edits and report you. --DrSeehas (talk) 06:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ATX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WTX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bulldozer (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cooling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Intel Core i7 microprocessors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vpro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emperor-Overlord100,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Intel ADX (Multi-Precision Add-Carry Instruction Extensions) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Anastasia (talk) 18:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Intel MPX(Memory Protection Extensions), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 19:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Intel SHA Extensions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to SSE and SHA

Intel MIC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to SMT

Intel MPX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Registers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding original research to this article. A partition table is, well, a data table and therefore does not have any executable code that can be subverted by a bootkit. The master boot record is most likely what you were thinking of. Here's some documentation to read. Socrates2008 (Talk) 09:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nintemulator, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 08:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Piledriver (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AVX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steamroller (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page APU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RAS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! On one side, I really appreciate your efforts to contribute, but the style and language you are providing are unfortunately not good enough for Wikipedia. Here it's all about providing verifiable content in an academic style of writing — please have a look at the great manuals of style provided by Wikipedia.

I totally understand that nobody is perfect, but please do some practice before you contribute here. How about getting yourself a blog, so you can practice there? You can get that yourself for free, and in a few minutes.

For example, your idea of contributing Uop Cache section to the CPU cache article was really great, but it ended up with me and another editor spending much more time fixing dozens of your bad edits over two days, than it would've taken us to write that section from the scratch.

Also, a few minutes ago I accidentally went to the NetBurst (microarchitecture) article, just to discover some really bad layouts and a pointless section... So, I scratched my head and got it fixed, without checking the revisions log first. Later, I saw it was your work, too... :(

Dude, get serious, please. I know we all need to never stop learning, but please consider figuring that yourself, too. Thank you!

-- Dsimic (talk) 22:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've just spent three hours cleaning up the mess you've left behind in many articles (Broadwell (microarchitecture), Steamroller (microarchitecture), AMD CrossFireX and POWER8 — just to name a few)... Once again, the ideas behind your contributions are quite good, but their realisation is horrible. That's why I suggested you to learn and practice before contributing — and you'll be good. Please, don't get me wrong, I wish you only the best. -- Dsimic (talk) 23:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Just as a note, you've just made a total of sixteen edits on the Steamroller (microarchitecture) article — for only about ten new words added, with no edit comments, and with quite a mess in words / punctuation marks spacing etc. Hm? -- Dsimic (talk) 01:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a note, today you've made a total of 25 edits to the Haswell (microarchitecture) article, ending up with a very small amount of actual changes for so many edits – and resulting in a wording that required a total cleanup. -- Dsimic (talk) 14:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't use bare URLs when adding references, those are prone to link rot etc. Please use something like below as a template while adding references:

<ref>{{cite web | url = | title = | date = | accessdate = | author = | publisher = }}</ref>

Thank you. -- Dsimic (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a note, this discussion moved over to my talk page. -- Dsimic (talk) 15:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steamroller (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ALU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intel MPX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skylake (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LGA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oranjelo100. Please be aware that a user conduct request for comment has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry is located at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Oranjelo100, where you may want to participate. -- Dsimic (talk) 00:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bulldozer (microarchitecture) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CVT16

Haswell (microarchitecture) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Broadwell

Piledriver (microarchitecture) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to TDP

Skylake (microarchitecture) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to GB

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nintendo DS emulation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rendering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duopoly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your reversion of my edits on PCSX2. I suggest you come to the talk page and discuss it, where there's been a discussion taking place. Specifically, this article is not the place to discuss AMD vs Intel performance, trivia about CPUs, and advocacy. If necessary, we can have an RFC about the matter. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:46, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

PCSX2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cache, Hardware, Post-processing, Bandwidth and Plug-in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PCSX2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radeon HD 7000 Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mantle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Media Player Classic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Plugin

Trac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of open-source software hosting facilities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SSH (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of open-source software hosting facilities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xenia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please review - Talk:Dolphin_(emulator)#DolphinFX - MaJoRoesch (talk) 04:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

DeSmuME (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to JIT, MSAA and Post-processing

PPSSPP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Resolution, JIT and SSAA

PCSX2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to JIT and MSAA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I2P, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DeSmuME, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rendering. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please remember when you make an edit to a page to follow the proper table formats. Your recent edits on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#GeForce_900_Series article removed many important columns from the table format. I had to reformat the table and add your edits in manually to fix the issue, normally people won't go to that much trouble and will instead undo your edits.

Please remember for next time to follow the correct formats, thanks. Jase240 (talk) 04:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

You and I have crossed path a couple of times during editing and I've noticed that you tend to respond reverts with a counter-revert instead of handling it properly without actually reading the reason for which you are reverted. Now, boldly editing, reverting and discussing is the nature of Wikipedia and the reason why people enjoy editing it. Almost every edit is bound to be reverted, and yes, there are people who take reverts as signs of hostility. As surprising is that, I am at a loss as to how they find editing Wikipedia fun or fruitful.

Of course, it isn't late to change course. I've reviewed and reverted your recent edits in DirectX because it consisted of adding indiscriminate info and being a product announcement. You can still discuss it in talk page, in case you have other reasons that justify its due weight. I promise you, I won't bite.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 02:05, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing it again. This time in Dolphin (emulator). And by not providing an edit summary for your counter-revert, you are effectively calling me a vandal.

Best regards,

Codename Lisa (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Codename Lisa: I second this. This user has a long term history of flagrant abuse both of encyclopedic content (WP:3RR WP:FANCRUFT WP:GAMECRUFT WP:NOTDIRECTORY) and of people (ignoring or belligerently attacking all attempts of outside engagement), as is seen above about "Dolphin FX". I don't expect it to stop, so be prepared to pursue a block for tendentious editing. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 13:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hello! Well, welcome to the club – so to speak. Please see my talk page for my previous experience with Oranjelo100, which unfortunately was pretty much a mess with no visible solution: User talk:Dsimic § Uop Cache, User talk:Dsimic § Number of edits (Oranjelo100) and User talk:Dsimic § That guy sections. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 19:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dsimic and Codename Lisa: O, my longsuffering and ultra-civil compatriots. The clear solution is a long, long, long, long overdue ban. Which has been requested. And if it isn't a long term one, it will surely become one at this rate. None of us, and so many others, and the encyclopedia itself, should have to put up with his cruel incompetence. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 11:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Smuckola: Yeah, you're totally right, it's really exhausting to deal with something like that. It's no wonder that we have WP:COMPETENCE as an essay, but alas, essays are not obligatory. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 11:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dsimic: You have created one of the kindest and most elaborate conversational Dunning-Kruger effect tests I've ever seen with this guy. His test performance was like an olympic grade faceplant. You got Dunning-Krugered harder than FREDDY Kruger. It's the death of a thousand cuts! It isn't worth your breath; just a ban. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 11:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you very much for kind words... I'm almost starting to blush over here. :) I'm just trying to make Wikipedia better, both as an encyclopedia and as a work environment. :) — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 12:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dsimic: I know, and sadly, the ends don't justify the means. No content is worth abuse. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 12:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, by the way, I don't like that much the concept of cutting or shredding someone to pieces. :) I'm a peaceful man. :) — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 06:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dsimic: Yeah no kiddin, we gotta exercise self respect. OMG his username used to be "Emperor-Overlord100". ...........wat — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 08:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Direct3D, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clipping. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nintendo GameCube technical specifications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flipper. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is an ongoing move request. --George Ho (talk) 23:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've received several complaints about your edits from other editors. In general, please try to remain civil when interacting with other editors. Also, please try to use reliable sources in your edits. It appears many of your edits are either unsourced, or use unreliable sources. For instance, you have repeatedly re-added this source to an article but Wikis are not usable sources on Wikipedia - they fail WP:USERG because anyone can write or change the content at any time. Please keep these things in mind, as any of them could get you blocked if you continue to do them. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 17:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You reintroduced challenged and uncited information in NetBurst (microarchitecture), even reintroducing the citation-needed tag. Additionally, you reintroduced other information and provided an unreliable citation, a citation that was actually a clone of Wikipedia. I removed those two changes (but left everything else in place, of course). Please be very careful, it's not permitted to reintroduce challenged and uncited information without providing a reliable cite for the information, even if you are pretty sure the information is correct. --Yamla (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Methamphetamine has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keikogi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sambo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Direct3D may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• TIER enumeration|date=22 February 2015|work=MSDN library|accessdate=22 February 2015}}</ref>), optional [[Uniform memory access|Unified Memory Access (UMA)]] support, and additional Tiled
• | Descriptors in CBV/SRV/UAV heap ||1M||1M||'''>1M'''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PlayStation Portable hardware, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LOD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Render output unit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to MIPS instruction set may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

* multiply & divide instructions redefined so that they use a single register for their result). | Multiply || mult $s,$t || LO = (($s * $t) << 32) >> 32;<br /> HI = ($s * $t) >> 32; || R || 0 || 18<sub>16</sub> || Multiplies two registers and puts the 64-bit result in two Multiply unsigned || multu $s,$t || LO = (($s * $t) << 32) >> 32;<br /> HI = ($s * $t) >> 32; || R || 0 || 19<sub>16</sub> || Multiplies two registers and puts the 64-bit result in two | Shift right arithmetic || srav $d,$t,$s || <math>\mathtt{$d = $t >> $s} + \left(\sum_{n=1}^{\mathtt{$s}}2^{32-n}\right)\cdot (\mathtt{$t>>31})</math> || R || 0 || 7<sub>16</sub> || shifts $s number of bits - the sign bit || FP compare single (eq,ne,lt,le,gt,ge) || c.lt.s $f2,$f4 || {{code|2=perl|1=if ($f2 < $f4) cond=1; else cond=0;}} || || || || Floating-point compare less than single precision

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Anti-Arabism page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Racism in Poland.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are fighting your war against Polish people. Wikipedia isn't a raight place for such wars.Xx236 (talk) 07:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't care to write Polish, Poles. Not polish.Xx236 (talk) 07:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Personnel halting and stimulation response rifle into Non-lethal weapon. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Directed-energy weapon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Technique. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You recently made a whole slew of edits on the aforementioned page, however this has left the page borderline unreadable. Because of this, I've reverted your edits. Please feel free to keep contributing to the page, but make sure your edits improve rather than degrade it.

Namely the issues with your edit were an alarming lack of line breaks, and using way too many initialisms. The majority of the information you added to the page does not belong in the opening paragraphs of the page but rather in a separate section elsewhere on it.

One of the sources you provided was also poor, namely this one; a Google spreadsheet by itself like that is completely meaningless to the reader. The rest of the sources, at least at a glance, seem fine though.

-- turdas^talk 23:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you see any problems with it could you try to improve it, instead of deleting it completely though I haven't finished it yet.Oranjelo100 (talk) 09:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. The onus is upon you, to stop writing broken English and generally unreadable prose, and stop citing non-WP:RSes. Stop citing weblogs, spreadsheets, and other random stuff. Stop making tons of little edits, incomplete edits, and edits without comprehensively justifying descriptions. Stop doing these things, ever, under any circumstances. This is all I've ever seen you do for years, and it's totally unencyclopedic. Everything you've always done is a huge long-term pattern of blockable offenses. @Turdas:, you have joined a long legacy of people reverting this defiant and uncooperative stuff. — Smuckola(talk) 10:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted it because I did not have the time to make heads or tails of it and fix it right that instant, and it seriously affected the quality of the page. Deletions on Wikipedia thankfully aren't permanent, so you can always recover what was deleted from the history of the page when you do have time to improve it—seems like you did that already, which is good.

I noticed you moved the edit to a more appropriate section, which is good. However, it's still difficult to read. You should break the text into at least 3-4 paragraphs, and avoid using that many initialisms. All the acronyms (WHG, ANE, EEF...) lose their meaning when you use so many of them.

When others cannot properly understand what you have written, it's difficult if not impossible for them to improve on it. That is exactly the case here as well. While it's plain to see that there is at least some information in your edit that is contributing to the article, it simply is too unclearly written to be of much value. You, the writer, are the one who best knows what you wanted to say, and thus you're the only one who can make it clear to others what that is.

-- turdas^talk 14:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of regions of Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Coast. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

-- turdas^talk 13:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Oranjelo100. I have suggested there that you might be blocked due to the principle that WP:Competence is required. It has been suggested by another editor that you are using machine translation to make your edits, which accounts for their fragmentary nature. You may respond to the complaint if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arabic script, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swahili. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qalat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English honorifics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mister. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kunya (Arabic) into Arabic name. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So these were your sources, and why they're no good:

• http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/468595/world-war-3-china-long-march-6-rocket-beat-us-missile-defence-shield-20-nuclear-warheads
  • Does not say the JL-3 exists or is operational. Only that tech from an existing missile may find its way into a the next PRC SLBM (provisionally referred to as JL-3 by media)
• http://www.deagel.com/Ballistic-Missiles/JL-3_a003321001.aspx
  • Deagal is actually an enthusiast website, owned and operated by, well, Deagal (check WHO IS.) Deagal's only reference is this article (Splutnik News of all things), which in turn takes for face value the beliefs of other enthusiasts about the Type 094A. Janes doesn't say anything about the Type 094A being armed with the JL-3; it just repeats the US DoD report saying that it's likely that the next PRC SSBN will be armed with a new SLBM.
• http://www.atimes.com/article/the-future-of-chinas-nuke-missile-subs-how-worried-should-america-be/
  • Also does not say the JL-3 exists or is operational. It says: "he underlines the imperative to develop the JL-3 SLBM with 12,000 km range that"; note the words "to develop".
• http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1864406/long-march-challenging-us-space-power-chinas-most
  • The same as Daily Star; repeating the belief of some guy that the next-gen PRC SLBM (i.e. JL-3) may use tech found in existing missile.
• https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140806042041-62667533-successful-test-of-china-s-jl-3-nuclear-slbm-able-to-hit-entire-usa
  • From 2014. By an enthusiast (look up the website Tiananmen's Tremendous Achievements). And given that the nobody who constitutes a reliable source thinks the JL-3 exists yet, let alone was test launched, two years later pretty much makes this source a non-starter.

- RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 01:57, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Intercontinental ballistic missile page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jeh. I noticed that you made a change to an article, X86, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You used over two dozen edits to add about two dozen claims of fact and you didn't provide a RS (or any source, for that matter) for a single one. I know the table is woefully unsourced as it is but that doesn't mean it's ok to make it worse. I strongly suggest that if you want to improve the x86 article your time would best be spent by adding references for the existing material in the table. edit summaries would be good too. Jeh (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have re-reverted to your version without discussion. That is contrary to WP:BRD. Please see the discussion I've started at the article talk page. Thank you. Jeh (talk) 20:27, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Precision-guided munition page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest reading the Manual of Style's guidelines for See Also sections. You are items a plethora of items that go beyond being "tangentially related" and which would appear in a "comprehensive article on the topic". - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: Like, I am unsure why you think adding links to specific systems to the list for a general subject article is particularly relevant. In an individual weapon article, links would be to similar/related weapons.

For, say, the SLBM article, a see also link to the ICBM article has a clear place; links to non-ballistic missile - or bomb - articles do not. The link to nuclear warfare serves as the articles gateway to everything else.

Also, you might consider whether it's worth adding ranges to the items in the article. It's a maintenance nightmare. Consider what happens if, for whatever reason, the range statistic is changes in the weapon's main article; now someone needs to go and hunt down every instance everywhere else. This can be particularly vexing for subjects for which our understanding is limited and which may change frequently. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]