User talk:Pesqara

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alessandria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Operation Strangle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for one week for abusive editing while logged out in violation of WP:SOCK. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This makes no sense...

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilson Villa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilson Villa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mvqr (talk) 10:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pesqara! On several articles you created, I fixed the DEFAULTSORT and removed the interlanguage links (after confirming they're on Wikidata), such as this edit. Please read Template:DEFAULTSORT and Help:Interlanguage links for more information on these features before you create your next article. Thanks, and happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 02:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I’ve just reviewed Corrado Lamberti. Thanks very much for creating this and happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Pesqara (talk) 06:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of deaths due to COVID-19, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of deaths due to COVID-19, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Manoel Batista Chaves Filho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, mayor of small town, so doesn't meet WP:NPOL either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sérgio Trindade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sérgio Trindade. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VQuakr (talk) 16:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manoel Batista Chaves Filho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoel Batista Chaves Filho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VQuakr (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of deaths due to COVID-19, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Comercio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are an experienced enough editor to know that you should not edit talk pages so as to remove editor's comments from their signature. Please revisit and improve your contribution at that talk page. Kevin McE (talk) 12:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that you removed anything: I said you had removed comments from their signature. Please do the decent thing and fix it. Kevin McE (talk) 12:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where and when? On the page I referred to, on the day I referred to it. Kevin McE (talk) 00:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please see this AfD following on from the RfC you commented on. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to notify any prior AfD participants of a new AfD, then you must notify all prior participants - see WP:CANVASS. Guy (help! - typo?) 15:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Pesqara (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pesqara. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pesqara (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Where did I "abuse multiple accounts" exactly? I created one reserve account, BrancaBrancaBranca, which I never used.--Pesqara (talk) 00:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This edit was checkuser-confirmed to be made by you. You certainly should not have created a "reserve account", especially given your previous violations of WP:SOCK, but that wouldn't have been enough to block you. Logged-out editing may indeed violate WP:SOCK (I can't tell if it did in this case). Yamla (talk) 11:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That is patently false. --Pesqara (talk) 16:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. --Yamla (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked by a checkuser for a week earlier this year. You seem to have ignored them, as Checkuser evidence shows you created another account recently, and have been editing while logged out. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 00:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And? Is it forbidden to edit while logged out? Regarding recent account creation, the notification itself states that it is not forbidden to have alternate accounts per se. --Pesqara (talk) 09:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have multiple accounts, you must clearly state so and be using them for legit reasons. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 17:49, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:, @CaptainEek: I belive User:Pesqara is continuing their edits in another sockpuppet form as the IP Special:Contributions/31.158.232.153. They are continuing Pesqara's edits on that article. MeltingDistrict (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I can't comment on IP addresses. :( Other admins should feel free to review based on behavioural information. --Yamla (talk) 18:30, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MeltingDistrict: Seeing as the page has been sock protected for the moment, that seems to have solved it. If it keeps, report it at WP:RFPP CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nswix (talk) 03:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]