User talk:Phizzy

Hello Phizzy. You have been invited to join WikiProject Java, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Java-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project or the Java Portal. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add to your userpage: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Java/Userbox}} and to the top of your talk page: == WikiProject Java (announcements) == {{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Java/Announcements}} Know someone who might be interested? Please pass the message to others by pasting the code in their talk page: == WikiProject Java and Portal == {{Template:WikiProject_Java/Welcome|~~~~}} Thanks, AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 01:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phizzy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Simplified Ruleset
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Glossary
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango123 (talk) 20:41, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Much better! Thanks - JohnInDC (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at your user page - nice collection. Allow me to offer that some of your other maps would be similarly improved by confining portrayals of obviously land-based characteristics to land. Absent some clear indication from the Census Bureau, for example, that MSAs are intended to include substantial adjacent (and uninhabited) water area, I think the western Michigan MSA map should confine the MSAs to land. JohnInDC (talk) 13:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, but the Census Bureau does seem to make it clear that the MSAs include the water area. At the links below, the area of the Holland-Grand Haven MSA is stated as 1632.0 square miles, which includes the Great Lakes water area. Similarly, the area of the Muskegon-Norton Shores MSA is stated as 1459.3 square miles.

http://www.2010census.biz/compendia/smadb/TableE-13.pdf

http://www.census.gov/compendia/smadb/TableB-01.xls Phizzy (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland CSA map. The borders are still defined out into Lake Michigan, but I've only highlighted the land in red. Does that look better? Phizzy (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief, you're right. The MSA is *intended* to extend into the water. All I can say to that is, it looks screwy.

Hey, how about if you lighten the red shade over the lake area, so that the land portion is red and the water portion is more pinkish / translucent? That would convey that 1) the MSA does literally include the water area (which strikes me BTW as totally stupid given what an MSA is supposed to reflect) but 2) you recognize that water is not the same as land. It also avoids the visual problem of making the state look like it actually *does* extend into the water there.

I liked the revised version - that little change makes it look like some care went into it. Funny how a subtle thing can make a difference like that. JohnInDC (talk) 15:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the talk page for serious concerns raised about this map. Rmhermen (talk) 19:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Image talk:MichiganIndianReservations.svg. Note: if using a GIS product, try using the na99_d00.shp available through the US Census Bureau. It will have all of the IRs and most of the TDSAs. CJLippert (talk) 14:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I get GIS shapefile coverage files showing Michigan's State and County boundaries across the Great Lakes, at a resolution range of 12K to 75K? I went to Michigan's Geographic Data Library (MiGDL) and found all sorts of coverages, but not the boundary coverages I was looking for. Point me in the right direction. Thanks. CJLippert (talk) 01:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I left a suggestion at Image talk:US-Canada-Border-Provinces.svg. Since you're the image author, I thought you might like to check on it. Amorim Parga (talk) 02:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my e-mail is on g-mail, and is yosef.garibaldi.

thanks for the maps, i hereby award you with the michigan region cartographer of merit digital merit decoration. i'll hear from you later, perhaps. any tips or links on how to best make a text-based game would be appreciated. (all i have now is a text editor made of Turing code -- i have learned basic network theory, and am planning on using an array with 515 elements for the first level, the array data will point to the possible array elements, and the keyboard and a text-based mouse cursor will add more interactivity to the ascii graphics and radar.) have a happy year 5769. (since the events of the Sefer Yetzirah, of course) Yosef.garibaldi (talk) 22:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Wikilink Barnstar
		To Phizzy: the PRISMATIC REFRACTOR OF THE LIGHT, for a conspicuous diligent and worthwhile contribution to Wikipedia and its List of lighthouses in the United States by height‎, and for thereby bringing together many widespread and missing links, lights and pertinent information, particularly on our Michigan lights. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 01:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Sorry for the late response, but thank you very much! Phizzy talk 02:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your fixes to Lighthouses in the United States. In the future, would you please add an WP:edit summary so other editors can more easily figure out what you're doing? Thanks. —EncMstr (talk) 19:06, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed you were able to answer my question. Exactly how does one use the factfinder so that you can search specifically for Michigan populations ranked by villages, incoporated cities, and townships? --Criticalthinker (talk) 09:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe you can use the factfinder in that fashion. I download the full set of vilages, cities, and townships (csv file) from census.gov and sorted it out myself. Phizzy (talk) 18:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

File:Alaska-Size.png is misleading because the flat projection exaggerates the size of Alaska and makes it seem much larger than it is when compared to the US. Could you redo the superimposition using a proper projection? Thanks - Tempshill (talk) 17:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is pretty accurate. Compare to the maps at National Park Service website...

http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/dena/images/map1.jpg

...the U.S. Marshals Service website...

http://www.usmarshals.gov/district/ak/images/alaska-small.gif

...the U.S. Forest Service website...

http://www.fs.fed.us/r10/ro/ak_overview/trivia/map.gif

...and one prepared by the National Geographic Society...

http://www.flyalaska.net/ak_on_us.jpg Phizzy (talk) 18:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I re-started ArtPrize. Whoever deleted it listed it as "not yet notable", arguably true as the exhibit has not started yet. To keep it from being deleted again, I added a New York Times and Chicago Tribune citation to establish "notablity'. I could not find what you originally wrote, so except for the category you added, I did this over from scratch. If you go, please put in a vote for the cast iron armillary sphere! Pustelnik (talk) 20:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent contribution. Pustelnik (talk) 17:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed...terribly sorry about the errors. How's this?

--Connormah (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Thanks! Phizzy 14:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure you know, but since Detroit successfully challenged the Census bureau for the 2006 municipal population numbers, what the Census did was simply 'shift' the population from other municipalities in Wayne County to Detroit. So, after 2006, the estimates for anything in Wayne County but Detroit are completely worthless. I just thought I'd give you a heads-up, on this. Perhaps, you can add a note to the page making note of this, as I'm sure people would be shocked to see the huge and unusual drops in population for many of Wayne County's suburbs. --Criticalthinker (talk) 00:49, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:USA-Lake-Effect-Snow-Areas.svg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:USA-Lake-Effect-Snow-Areas.svg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:USA-Lake-Effect-Snow-Areas.svg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

This is a nice diagram but it only is about the US part of the Great lakes Snow Belt. Could you produce a total image, including the Canadian part east of the Huron and Superior lakes? Pierre cb (talk) 04:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forget about this request. I did one myself. Pierre cb (talk) 19:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any thoughts on Talk:Cato_June#Length. There are a couple of editors who have chopped up my articles in the past debating with me about detail.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of United States towns with the same name as subnational regions. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States towns with the same name as subnational regions. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Elias Abuelazam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ≈ Prometheus  «talk» 18:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the Michigan CBSA maps, you drew a border between the land and water and highlighted them with different color. Where did you get the data that defines the land boundary? I could only get "state legal boundaries (which include the water)" from the census shape files. Thanks. 75.183.96.242 (talk) 02:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has been suggested that 4 US related project be merged into Wikipedia:WikiProject United States due to a long state of inactivity. I noticed that you were one of the last editors to change anything on the project so I thought you might want to voice your opinion about the merger. Please comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States#Close out some Inactive/nonfunctional US related WikiProjects. --Kumioko (talk) 18:46, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SPCorpLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	hello Quadratic diver (talk) 13:58, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Phizzy,

I am writing to you after I observed via discussions at Talk:2012 Summer Olympics medal table#Rank numbers wrong, that your customized user signature contains an image file within it. In accordance to the guidelines at Wikipedia:CUSTOMSIG#Images "images of any kind must not be used in signatures", this is because:

• They are an unnecessary drain on server resources, and could cause server slowdown
• A new image can be uploaded in place of the one you chose, making your signature a target for possible vandalism and denial-of-service attacks
• They make pages more difficult to read and scan
• They make it more difficult to copy text from a page
• They are potentially distracting from the actual content
• Images do not scale with the text, making the lines with images higher than those without them
• They clutter up the "file links" list on the respective image's page every time one signs on a different talk page
• Images in signatures give undue prominence to a given user's contribution

Would it be possible please that you review your signature and remove any images that are contained with them. Much regards, Wesley Mouse 00:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're interested, there's a POV warrior disrupting the article with spurious tags, since he hasn't been able to get it deleted. — kwami (talk) 18:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Chris, a community liaison in the Discovery department at the Wikimedia Foundation. One of the projects we’re working on is to bring interactive maps to Wikipedia. If you are interested, I’d like to have an informal conversation with you about your work with WikiProject Maps, and the conventions you all have created. I'd like to learn more about your work and how that might influence the design of interactive maps.

Please let me know of some good times to chat via email and I can setup a meeting for us. I can be reached at ckoernerwikimedia.org.

If you’re not interested, that’s fine. I would appreciate any direction to other editors that have been involved and might be interested.

Have a good day, CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phizzy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Phizzy! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phizzy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please revise the Lake Effect Snow Areas map to include Berrian County, MI and Northwestern Indiana? These areas routinely get accumulating lake effect snow whenever the wind is from the NNW or straight North, extending measurable snow well into Jasper and Pulaski counties in Indiana in the latter case. When the wind is from the NNW, it is not uncommon to have heavy accumulations and whiteout conditions in the triangular area formed by Michigan City, South Bend/Elkhart, and Benton Harbor/St. Joseph. (Feel free to fact check archived snow accumulation data) Hagaland (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phizzy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Call for presentations for WikiConference North America 2022 and OpenStreetMap US's Mapping USA This is a call for presentations by EOD, Sunday, October 15, for WikiConference North America (Nov 11-13), held jointly with OpenStreetMap US's Mapping USA. We encourage you to please submit your Wikipedia and Wikimedia proposals at Wikiconference:2022/Submissions or OpenStreetMap US proposals at Call for Proposals: WikiConference North America + Mapping USA. We are sending this mass message to you because we deduced that you may be in North America and interested in maps in Wikimedia or Wikipedia, OpenStreetMap, or OpenHistoricalMaps. We are looking for lightning talks in particular on Friday, Nov 11. Some suggestions: Cultural similarities and differences, for instance OpenStreetMap and Wikivoyage (map and describe what you know) versus Wikipedia (verify with citations) Type of licensing for each project and how they differ: OpenStreetMap, Commons, Wikidata, and Wikipedia The flow of information from one project into another, and how maps are generated How OpenHistoricalMap works and possible interactions with Wikimedia projects Your ideas! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiConference North America 2022 will be virtual, November 11-13. We will hold it jointly with OpenStreetMap US's Mapping USA. Our theme this year is open knowledge allies. Registration is now open here! Please register by the 10th so that we can set everyone up online on our platform. Like last year, we are planning on using Hopin. Our schedule is will be finalized and available in the next few days. We have an exciting line-up of sessions related to Wikimedia, OpenStreetMap, and the intersection of the two. Stay tuned! Local meet-ups will occur in Indianapolis and New York City - if you are available and interested in attending either of these, you can find more details here. If you want to connect with other participants or have questions, please join our Telegram channel here.

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Glendale, Utah, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]