User talk:Poesam

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Poesam/Trenton Indian Service Area has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trenton Indian Service Area, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 03:05, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trenton Indian Service Area. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! hewhoamareismyself 04:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Poesam/Saulteaux First Nation has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saulteaux First Nation, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 09:59, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trenton Indian Service Area. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  10:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saulteaux First Nation. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  10:39, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I, SarahStierch, hereby award you, Poesam, with the Writer's Barnstar. Thank you for your continuous efforts to improve coverage related to Indian Country - past and present, on English Wikipedia. Your work has not gone unnoticed. Thank you!!! SarahStierch (talk) 06:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Swan creek and black river chippewas, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 10:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rocky Boy Indian Reservation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Babb

Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dunseith

White Earth Indian Reservation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Twin Lakes

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ojibwe people, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Sandy (talk) 07:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Nakawe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algonquin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anamikaagen / Welcome Poesam. I have noticed you have done significant edits to many articles falling into the Anishinaabe subproject (IPNA/Nish) of the Indigenous Peoples of North America project (IPNA). Miigwech. However, many of your addition violates the neutral point of view (NPOV) policy. I have begun editing some of the article to bring to NPOV, but I encourage you to do this yourself. If you need assistance from other users, please feel free to post a discussion at either IPNA or IPNA/Nish. Miigwech. Baanimaa. CJLippert (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Grahams Island does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! additionally the tags you removed remain valid. Please do not remove tags without either confirming that the issues have been fixed or solving them yourself. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:36, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Chief Rocky Boy. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Scopecreep (talk) 00:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chief Little Bear with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Calabe1992 00:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Chippewa Dakota War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort St. Louis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chief Little Bear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wandering Spirit

Consolidated Bahwetig Ojibwas of Michigan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Treaty of Washington

Lake Superior Chippewa of Marquette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Treaty of Washington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahontoay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahontoay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Muskegoes, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Angrysockhop ^{(talk to me)} 08:00, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chippewa Indians of Montana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to French, Great Falls and Sault Ste. Marie

Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cypress Hills

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Muskegoes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Donald Albury 20:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Swampy Cree a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Thank you. -Uyvsdi (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

Do not remove notices for active AfD discussions, as you did here. If you continue to do so your edits may be seen as vandalism. --joe decker^{talk to me} 20:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I see that you are unhappy about a page getting deleted. You should not be blaming any one person for this. There was a discussion and a collective decision was made. Please read the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahontoay. Certainly being rude to Joe Decker is not going to help you. What you need to do is read the policies on verification and reliable sources so that you can reference your future edits properly. Remember that it is the responsibility of anybody adding information to provide references to verify the content. Unreferenced or very badly referenced content can be removed. It is not anybody else's fault if content is removed because nobody can verify it. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Assinibwan Indians of Montana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assinibwan Indians of Montana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yasht101 03:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Assinibwan Indians of Montana has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Srikar Kashyap (talk) 06:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Non Treaty Chippewa Indians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non Treaty Chippewa Indians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoelWhy (talk) 20:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poesam, I appreciate that you are attempting to add substantive information to Wikipedia. However, I believe you should read up a bit on Wiki policies and guidelines. Otherwise, your pages will continue to be tagged for problems and/or deleted. You need to provide proper sources for the statements you make. [This page on Citing sources] may be of some help to you. I also suggest you read [this page] on maintaining a neutral point of view. You clearly feel passionate about topics related to Native Americans. However, Wikipedia is intended to provide objective information. Statements such as "The United States may claim otherwise but land is the issue" clearly falls short of this goal. Even if you are 100% certain that your opinion is the correct one to have, this is not the venue to voice your opinion.

Finally, you need to review Wikipedia:Edit warring to protect yourself from being banned from editing altogether. If this occurs, it does not help you or the Wikipedia community.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask.JoelWhy (talk) 20:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm Hispanic. But, your racist commentary and thinly-veiled threats have been duly noted. Cheers! JoelWhy (talk) 20:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.JoelWhy (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks - you don't get to make comments like this and remain a Wikipedia editor. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:22, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The User have also been making personal attacks here. CJLippert (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poesam boozhoo. Aaniish maanaaji-ozhibii'awadwaa Omashkiigoog? Gaawiin Omashkiigoog Ojibwewisiiwag! Niin sa CJLippert (talk) 22:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Black Horse Lake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article created by indef blocked user, no evidence this feature ever existed as such

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 02:18, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article State of Ontonagon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced fringe article created by indef-blocked user

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 02:22, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Non Federally Recognized Chippewa Indians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, can't find any source. Similar article at AfD by the same author on its way to deletion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 19:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Consolidated Bahwetig Ojibwas of Michigan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article with serious POV issues. Created by now-banned biased editor.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 23:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Swan Creek and Black River Chippewas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clearly a personal essay by now-banned biased editor. Unreferenced, with serious POV and tone issues.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 23:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chippewa Dakota War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essay based on original research by now-banned editor. The two external links don't back up all the POV claims in the article. No incoming article links.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oklevueha Band Indian Colony has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced orphan POV article by now-banned editor.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lake Superior Chippewa of Marquette has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced orphan POV article by now-banned editor.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saulteaux First Nation, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 08:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trenton Indian Service Area, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 10:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saulteaux First Nation, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trenton Indian Service Area, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Poesam. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Saulteaux First Nation".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saulteaux First Nation}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Poesam. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Trenton Indian Service Area".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trenton Indian Service Area}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ojibwe in Montana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Multiple tags that were added in 2012 that have not been addressed. No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Black Horse Lake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Couldn’t find much sources, so no sure if it even exists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Horse Lake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Horse Lake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]