User talk:Rigley

If I have left you a message: please answer on my talk page, else inform me. If you leave me a message: I will answer on your talk page, unless you request otherwise. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Hi Agree with you on all points concerning Tibet. Could you point me in the direction of sources of the PRC contribution to the preservation of Tibetan culture? Also, 'unbiased' sources of China/Tibet history. Many thanks.

Stephen. [email protected] www.stephenraustin.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen A (talk • contribs) 02:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tibet is an independent entity and the dirty simian chinese should be kicked out of there so as to restore Tibet's status as a sovereign and free republic. To this end, India along with Russia and the US, together with all the SE Asian nations should come together and slaughter the chinese to the last monkey.117.194.236.83 (talk) 10:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There should be an article for the Turkic Muslim conquest of the Buddhist Indo-European Kingdom of Khotan- explaining how the Tarim Basin got Turkified. AS of now, its a big gap in the articles on the history of Xinjiang.Rajmaan (talk) 22:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Family planning policy, Rigley!

Wikipedia editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Social consequences and such sections are needed

To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, Rigley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen this new requested move? --Elnon (talk) 22:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Surreal Barnstar
	For your surrealist yet perfectly true comment in the covfefe AfD: "Has reliable covfefe in secondary sources, and also tertiary sources that describe the covfefe of covfefe" — JFG talk 21:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Gablescar. Shrike (talk) 18:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rigley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rigley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I changed your wording here [1] because it was a non-encyclopaedic wording not found in source. Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gender neutrality in Spanish and Portuguese. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 12#Gender neutrality in Spanish and Portuguese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-blackness and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Anti-blackness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Republic of China (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of China (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Güija has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 8 § Güija until a consensus is reached. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 02:09, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]