User talk:Ragusan

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Ragusan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Amren (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How is it possible to site sources? For D'n'D I would use Balkanmedia and one more which I happen to have forgotten, but I will look for it, just tell me as quickly as possible how to do this. Ragusan

Montenegrin language

[edit]

Pisaću na ... maternjem jeziku, jer mi je tako lakše.

Druže, kao prvo, još nisi sasvim ovladao korišćenjem vikipedije. Kada dođeš na nečiju stranicu za razgovor trebalo bi da dodaš novu stavku. Kao drugo, na stranici za jezik (koja bi trebalo da bude samo za jezik i ništa drugo), ti si počeo kako kažu "od Kulina Bana". Zatim, išao si u detalje kako se izgovara slovo "j" u nekim a kako u drugim dijalektima, što je potupuno nepotrebno u članku o jeziku, gde čovek treba da dobije samo preciznu informaciju.

A posebno to što ne koristiš preview opciju, a ne da po pet-šest puta sačuvavaš članak.

Što se tona tiče, dovoljne su ove stvari koje sam naveo da dobijemo ton koji nije enciklopedijski, a kamoli stilska neusaglašnost koja se dobija sa tvojim dodacima u odnosu na ono što je ranije pisalo u članku.

Pogledao sam i neke druge tvoje doprinose na vikipediji, i posebno mi je palo u oči ono što si pisao o Zdravku Čoliću. Potpuno neproverena informacija. U enciklopediji treba da stoji samo ono što je provereno, a ako nije, to treba naznačiti.

Nadam se da ti je sada malo jasnije kako treba da koristiš vikipediju. Želim ti da ubuduće dobro izvagaš svaku reč koju staviš na ove stranice.--RockyMM 22:32, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


OK, drago mi je da smo se razumeli. Samo sam zaboravio sinoć da kažem da nisam ja promenio referencu sa bosanskog jezika na srpski o Bosni. Ustvari, ne znam o čemu se radi? Možda si me pomešao sa Nikolom Smolenskim? Nadam se da ćeš i pored prvih kritika nastaviti da doprinosiš ovde u vikipediji. Pozdrav!--RockyMM 09:46, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

reply

[edit]

Yes, then we agree on that. If the exact place has an article, then by clicking through, anyone can find out where that place was at that time. If it doesn't, it should be noted where it was at the time.

I reverted that last edit of yours simply on a technicality - the preferred format on Wikipedia is to put the date of birth immediately after the name in parenthesis. It's just for consistency.

--Joy [shallot] 11:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't take offense for my rebuttal of Latinic, it's not a retribution of any kind, I just happened to notice it in your contributions :) I'm not a big fan of deleting articles, but sometimes it's better to discuss topics prior to creating articles about them, in case the title is wrong. --Joy [shallot] 11:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslavia in birthplaces

[edit]

Please don't overdo it. For people who have only lived a fraction of their life (during most of which they were children without notability) in Yugoslavia, it's completely irrelevant that they were born in another country. For Ljubičić, okay, his career was impacted by the Yugoslav wars. However, for Kostanić or Ančić, it's irrelevant, they have no real association with the old country, nor does the old country have any real association with them, even if they did technically live a couple of initial years in it. --Joy [shallot] 23:34, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Slovenia-Croatia

[edit]

Yes, there are border disputes, but they are not an essential thing that deserves to be mentioned in the history summary. I moved it to History of Slovenia. --Joy [shallot] 22:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big Trev and Nige are legends, they don't really exist dispite what local press say. User:Celtmist 2 August 2006

Hi!

[edit]

How's the weather over in Trebinje? --PaxEquilibrium 21:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you leave if I may know? Buisines? --PaxEquilibrium 23:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I feared that the Bosnian War might've been the reason. --PaxEquilibrium 18:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh

[edit]

Catholic; from southern Dalmatia (Herzegovina) and no national affiliation. You must be a native ancestral of the Romanized populace. ;) --PaxEquilibrium 00:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

[edit]

the article on Medo Pucich has been mysteriously deleted. --PaxEquilibrium 23:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed sockpuppet

[edit]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Moroccan Spaniard . As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.
If you believe this block to be unjustified, you can contest it by adding {{unblock|reason}} on this page, replacing reason with an explanation of why you think this is an unjust block. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
Slowking Man 23:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

???? You're a sockpuppet??? --PaxEquilibrium 17:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article DnD (Serb pop duo), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Ragusan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 714 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Jo Callis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]