User talk:Riversid

Hello, Riversid, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lumia (citrus) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Lumia (citrus) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://olharfeliz.typepad.com/citrus/citrus-lumia/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Riversid! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Citron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leon Dexter Batchelor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverside. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Citrus

added links pointing to Mandarin and Papeda

Ira J. Condit

added links pointing to Santa Barbara and Lingnan University

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of California Botanical Society, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://calbotsoc.org/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:California Botanical Society. Thanks. Avono♂ (talk) 20:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Robert Willard Hodgson

added links pointing to Date, Oroville, Orange grove and Fig

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Citrus Industry (book)

added links pointing to Specie and UCR

Willard Paul Bitters

added links pointing to Riverside and Yuma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Eliot Coit

added a link pointing to Pasadena

Walter Reuther (taxonomist)

added a link pointing to Indio

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pixie mandarin, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://citrusvariety.ucr.edu/citrus/pixie.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see that you haven't been here long, and been doing a lot in an area where few people are active - your name has come up on my watchlist a few times. That's great. However, I'm very concerned to see how many of these notices from CorenSearchBot there are on this page. I came here to tell you that I have blanked Pixie mandarin and listed it at WP:Copyright problems because it appears to contain copyright content copied from http://homeguides.sfgate.com/size-pixie-mandarin-citrus-tree-51518.html. I'm putting this personal message here rather than a large and invasive template, but I do want to impress on you that copyright material can not ever be added to Wikipedia without permission of the copyright owner, and that repeated copyright violations can rapidly lead to undesirable consequences. I had hoped to find that this was a one-off, a momentary lapse of attention, but I see that, for example, this version of Malus 'Evereste' contains material copied directly from Deepdale Trees; that you have subsequently slightly altered the wording does prevent that from being a copyright violation, I'm afraid. It would be helpful if you would go through your edits to date and completely remove any content that was copied from another source, whether or not that content has since been rephrased. You are of course free to add similar content that is written entirely in your own words. Your help in clearing this up would be much appreciated. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cold hardy citrus, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://enc.tfode.com/Cold_Hardy_Citrus.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Howard Brett Frost

added links pointing to Clone, Breeding and Long Beach

Citrus hybrids

added a link pointing to Fortunella

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your edits to Citron and your interest in editing any articles that have to do with citrus fruits. However, I could tell from your edits and the statement on your user page that you are not a native speaker of English. That probably explains why another editor added a tag to the article on Citron this afternoon, after your edits. I corrected the errors and removed the tag. I would like to offer my assistance to you. If you have a sentence or caption you'd like me to review either before or after you add something to an article, or a question about wording, please either ping me or leave a comment on my talk page. CorinneSD (talk) 03:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Citrus taxonomy

added links pointing to Persian and Sweet lemon

Etrog

added links pointing to Bar Kokhba and Menorah

Citrus australasica

added a link pointing to Swingle

Citrus limonum var. dulcis

added a link pointing to Pulp

Orange (fruit)

added a link pointing to Rangpur

Pomelo

added a link pointing to Petiole

Ponderosa lemon

added a link pointing to Yuma

Rough lemon

added a link pointing to Rangpur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Citrus black spot page, your edit caused a wikilink error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Malus evereste, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.deepdale-trees.co.uk/trees/2010/05-Malus-Evereste.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Citrus rootstock

added links pointing to Dade County and Scion

Amanatsu

added a link pointing to Chronic

Citrus hybrids

added a link pointing to Scion

Malus yunnanensis

added a link pointing to Yunan

Pristine apple

added a link pointing to Biennial

Rajka (apple)

added a link pointing to Scab

Reinette

added a link pointing to Chantecler

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Banpeiyu, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://idtools.org/id/citrus/citrusid/factsheet.php?name=Banpeiyu.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy Holiday Cheer
		Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an Awesome Holiday and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! Joys!Hafspajen (talk) 02:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, I'm Tr00rle. Riversid, thanks for creating Orange Pippin!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. any references besides the site itself? otherwise, what's the significance of the topic?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Tr00rle (talk) 02:02, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you search Wikipedia to see how many times it cites Orange Pippin? It is a really important website in my eyes. Riversid (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Delbard

added links pointing to Regenesis and Malicorne

Allington Pippin

added a link pointing to Biennial

Banpeiyu

added a link pointing to Malaya

Procimequat

added a link pointing to Orange

Triphasia grandifolia

added a link pointing to Merrill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Bigaradier panaché.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for your work on this article. One note regarding your redirect from the all-caps title to the (proper) mixed-case title: It is usually preferable to rename articles like that using the Move feature (up top-right under the More dropdown). Copying the content into a new article and re-directing the old is not recommended, as it leaves the edit history of the article split over 2 locations. The ability to source all edits from the history is one requirement of the free license we use, so having it all together is always preferred. No harm done, as I've requested a merge of the 2 articles, so this will soon be fixed; I just wanted to leave you a note for future reference, as you'll no doubt find more cases where a page rename is needed. Thanks for all your work! Crow^Caw 22:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't know how to do that, or that there is such an option. Riversid (talk) 16:02, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, (t) Josve05a (c) 15:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your assistance!Riversid (talk) 03:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm the Wikipedia Visiting Scholar at UCR so I've been watching your edits and talk page for awhile. In regards to your request at FFU, while Wikipedia allows several types of Creative Commons content, it also allows people to sell Wikipedia's content. The image you wanted to upload is tagged CC-NC (non-commercial) so Wikipedia can't upload a file knowing full well businesses are legally allowed to profit off of our content. This is a silly thing Wikipedia has done and if I had a nickel for everytime Wikipedia screwed up I'd be self-employed. Still, rules are rules. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your assistance!Riversid (talk) 03:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed you were adding Category:Natural cultivars to articles on species and wondered if you might take a moment to rethink that strategy. I have reverted a few of your edits and would suggest you finish off the rest. Articles titled at the species name are primarily about the species and not any named cultivar that is derived from them, whether they were natural or resulted from horticultural selection. Cheers, Rkitko ^(talk) 20:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I only did that when I assumed that that the species consists only from one cultivar, or when it is a wild species that probably all of its known cultivars are natural. Maybe I was wrong on one or two cases, I don't assume too much more.Riversid (talk) 20:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I see from your language that you would consider a pure lineage selection as non-fit in this category, if it was artificially selected even if not artificially modified through cross plant breeding. I don't understand so and wondered if you meant it. Either way I appreciate your comment. Riversid (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again. First, it's best not to assume anything about an article. Adding categories is best done only when the article mentions something that would then make it eligible for inclusion in that category -- and even then, it should be referenced. The article Acalypha eggersii says nothing about cultivars or even its cultivation, so it would be difficult for any reader to figure out why it was included in Category:Natural cultivars.

I'm still confused as to what you expect to accomplish with this category. Would a list be better? I'd also note that our article on cultivars doesn't mention anything about "natural" cultivars at all. Strictly speaking, cultivars are varieties chosen and named according to International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants. I understand that some species we have described today are considered to be the result of ancient cultivation, but the evidence for those must be presented somewhere, either in the individual articles or at a central List of natural cultivars.

If you're looking for assistance on these matters, some of the editors at WikiProject Plants are more knowledgeable than I am on the topic of cultivars -- User:Peter coxhead comes to mind. And if you're interested in Rosaceae (I noticed several edits to Malus species articles), perhaps User:Sminthopsis84 could be of some help. Cheers, Rkitko ^(talk) 21:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I find that it is considered important for people to distinguish between an original or natural plant and a modern breed. I wouldn't find it so important to create a separate article for this, but just like the origins of the plants are categorized and so on. Usually I have looked into the article if it says that it is a pure breed or a chance seedling, or in contrary, that it is a hybrid created by man. But you are right with that example that I have overlooked something.Riversid (talk) 21:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know you'll be reviewing the latest edit to Citron: [1]. I can't judge whether it's correct or not, but I just thought I'd point out that if you want to keep "Papeda", the link to that word needs to be fixed. It leads to a disambiguation page. CorinneSD (talk) 19:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Leon Dexter Batchelor, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://texts.cdlib.org/view?docId=hb3r29n8f4&doc.view=entire_text, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Leon Dexter Batchelor and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Leon Dexter Batchelor, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Leon Dexter Batchelor. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Leon Dexter Batchelor with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Leon Dexter Batchelor saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Nusumareta (talk) 09:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Robert Willard Hodgson, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://websites.lib.ucr.edu/agnic/webber/Vol2/vol2dedication.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Robert Willard Hodgson and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Robert Willard Hodgson, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Robert Willard Hodgson. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Robert Willard Hodgson with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Robert Willard Hodgson saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Nusumareta (talk) 10:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Walter Reuther (taxonomist), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://cnas.ucr.edu/news_old/2011-01-10.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Walter Reuther (taxonomist) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Walter Reuther (taxonomist), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Walter Reuther (taxonomist). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Walter Reuther (taxonomist) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Walter Reuther (taxonomist) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Nusumareta (talk) 10:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tracy L. Kahn, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.fiatlux.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/display.cgi?id=452, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Tracy L. Kahn and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Tracy L. Kahn, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tracy L. Kahn. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Tracy L. Kahn with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Tracy L. Kahn saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Nusumareta (talk) 10:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Robert Soost, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://newsroom.ucr.edu/2042, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Robert Soost and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Robert Soost, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Robert Soost. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Robert Soost with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Robert Soost saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Nusumareta (talk) 10:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Riversid. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry about this, but I believe it to be necessary. I wish you had responded to, or at least taken notice of, the note I left you on 21 December. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hassaku orange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to thank you for making an entry for J. Eliot Coit. I've been doing research on him and when I first started, I don't think there was a Wikipedia page yet. I still haven't gotten the hang of Wikipedia editor culture and tools so I'm happy that you were able to make an article for him. Spidra (talk) 04:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Riversid. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, Riversid. Citrus is crazy!
Can you please help me out with some sources for pamplemousse being used in English for the shaddock/pomelo? —Wiki Wikardo 20:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orange Pippin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orange Pippin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

{{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 20:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]