User talk:RunningTiger123

Archives (Index)

1 2

Hi,there. I've see that you have add the new Tagged quote. The oscars awarded for film industry in all the world, the winners and nominees come from international, seeing: https://variety.com/2024/awards/awards/oscars-global-filmmakers-1235929184/. Isn't any problems? Thanks. Stevencocoboy (talk) 08:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevencocoboy: The issue is that a quote is used, but that quote is not used in any of the cited references and I can't find the quote via a Google search. If you're not directly quoting someone, you shouldn't use quotation marks, as it gives the wrong impression about who said it (i.e., you're implying that the wording is based on an authoritative source when it's really an original comment). If you can't find the source for that quote, it should be removed and the previous wording restored for now. RunningTiger123 (talk) 15:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

The 76th Primetime Emmy Awards are scheduled to be broadcast tonight. I attempted to begin work on preparing the article eligible for In the News consideration and ultimately featured list promotion (which I plan to nominate it on October 10 or 19). I was wondering if you could help me with expanding the article because I know you promoted three Primetime Emmy ceremonies and their respective Creative Arts portions to FL. I am currently working on List of accolades received by Oppenheimer (film) as a featured list candidate. Birdienest81talk 07:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Birdienest81: I can't help too much today or this week for ITN consideration, but I'd be happy to help with more work to get it up to FLC standards after that. RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HI there,

I've recently rewritten and expanded sections of the 76th Primetime Emmy Awards article in preparation of nominating the list for featured list promotion on October 10 or 19. Among the changes that I've made:

• A completely revised introduction that now includes a summary of the winners.
• Inclusion of more facts and historic firsts from the nominees, programs, and networks proceeding the tables.
• Revised total awards won tally by network that includes wins from the Creative Arts and Main Ceremony.
• References for the presenters and they are now bundled into one at the top of the section.
• Details of production of ceremony such as musical director, choice to group presenters by character archetype, etc.
• Critics reviews of the program.
• Ratings denoting a slight increase from 6.87 to 6.9 million as denoted by Programming Insider (it reads 6.897, so I rounded up the figure and used a better citation, in this case Reuters).

That's what I have so far. I'm planning to include maybe three more reviews. I've followed how you did it according previous Primetime Emmy ceremony lists that were promoted to FL. As for rule changes, there doesn't seem to be anything that affects the main telecast portion of the awards since most of the changes seem to affect the craft categories handed out during the Creative Arts portion. The only thing affecting both ceremonies is probably the switching of Variety Live Special, Writing for a Variety Special, and Writing got a Variety Series which was actually agreed upon two years ago as part of a rotation agreement with the WGA. If you see anything urgent feel free to give me feedback or you can make edits to the list yourself. Birdienest81talk 21:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Birdienest81: I'll make sure to look over the article and make updates as needed. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RunningTiger123: Alright, I've added three more critics reviews of the ceremony and noted the category switching. I was wondering if I should mention under the "Winners and nominees" section about Pasek and Paul joining the List of EGOT winners since they won in a category presented at the Creative Arts ceremony a week before the main broadcast? Other than that, I think all the bases have been covered. If you want to try to revised or change, feel free to do so (I think I may need help on the critical reviews section). I plan to co-nominate with you this list on October 10 or 19. Birdienest81talk 18:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Infobox awards list § Totals should be avoided. Since you've participated in the discussion previously, and a mock-up of Template:infobox_awards_list without the awards totals has been created, it would be good to get your opinion again. Sgubaldo (talk) 12:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Following the completion of several other projects I wanted to set myself a semi impossible task in a How I Met Your Mother GT. Given that there are over 200 episodes and most of them need to be burnt to the ground I was looking into reaching out to a few fellow editors who may perchance be interested in co-nominating a few of those articles? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: It's been a little bit since I've watched the show and I'm currently starting a different task, but I'd be happy to chip in if I have some time. Do you have any resources that could help fill out the articles? Reviews will probably be easy enough to find, but I suspect production sections will be more difficult, especially for a multi-cam sitcom where production is less intricate. I would recommend researching if there are any guides to the show – I know that's how The X-Files has a lot of episode GAs. DVD commentaries have also been used, but I suspect that using them for entire sections nowadays would be rejected as too much primary sourcing. RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortuantly no but the popularity of the show and the creators did enjoy interviews means there are am abundance of sources of varying quality. There are some pretty solid dvd extras Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: Sounds fine by me. I would suggest starting with season premieres and finales as those generally get better coverage, and working from there based on how sourcing looks. Just my two cents. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the season 1 article for HIMYM is FLC I would be willing to help you fix it up. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: Also fine by me, though to be clear, the likeliest course of action would be to nominate the list at GAN, not bring it back to FL standards. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]