User talk:Sheryl Abbey

Welcome to Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means, and on Notability (organizations and companies) for more detail. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources, and must be written from a neutral point of view and not in a promotional style. Articles that don't meet these requirements are likely to be deleted.

• To find out more about creating articles, read the Introduction and the Guide to creating your first article.
• You should not write articles about yourself, your band, your client, your boss or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
• Wikipedia is not an advertising service or business directory. Before writing about your own business, read Business' FAQ.
• For experiments, please use the sandbox.

JohnCD (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Koren (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

this disambiguation page only points to a single valid article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Koren Publishers Jerusalem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article "under construction" with no progress for several days, still not meeting the basic notability requirements.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 13:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Koren Publishers Jerusalem, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koren Publishers Jerusalem. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Eliyahu Koren, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koren Publishers Jerusalem. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Koren Type, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koren Publishers Jerusalem. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Eliyahu Koren has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Doulos Christos ♥ talk  15:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've put in a request at WP:AN#Need history merge for the article to be properly moved. In the future, you'll want to read through WP:MOVE. Thanks!  Doulos Christos ♥ talk  15:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised though that no other returns has his name spelled without the i - maybe non-internet sources did. I was really hesitant at first before making the merge of the history. --JForget 15:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can easily rename the page by clicking the "move" tab at the top. The larger problem you have here is lack of sources. You can cite a wide range of published sources, newspapers, the web sites of organizations, books, and you can cite Hebrew sources as well as English sources. You really do ned to add sources. And you should add pages on the Koren Siddur and the Koren Bible. The page says that the Bible is now out in English. I thought the English/Hebrew Bible was still forthcoming.Historicist (talk) 20:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If the name has already been changed once, you may not be able to simply click move. You will need published sources establishing the alternate spelling. It is also customary to put all alternate spellings in the opening.Historicist (talk) 20:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does the Hebrew/English Siddur use Koren Bible type? Historicist (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other then pages that are similar to Wikipedia articles or from other encyclopedias, virtually every reference to him has the "i" on his given name. I think it would have to be return back to its original spelling prior to the move. I will move the article back to the original spelling. JForget 22:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wikipediaimages.3.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wikipediaimages.2.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Moynihan's Moment.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:24, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Moynihan's Moment, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sheryl Abbey. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Moynihan's Moment".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Moynihan's Moment}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]