User talk:StrangeApparition2011

Welcome!

Hello, StrangeApparition2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rlendog (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

National Hockey League lore

added links pointing to Billy Smith, The Forum, John Casey, Chris Clark, Dave King, Andy Brown, Keith Brown, Mike Vernon, Jim Henry, Doug Smith, Andy McDonald, Harvey Bennett, Mark Hardy, Mike Peluso, Randy Gregg, Larry Murphy, Derek Morris, Bruce Hood, Doug Harvey and Joe Malone

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Hockey League lore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jacques Martin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Hockey League lore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Purple Gang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been wanting for someone to do an NHL lore page! TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 16:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Behind the Australian leagues of the AFL and NRL the NHL is my 3rd favourite league. I would add the Anaheim Ducks comeback in the last 2 minutes against Dallas in the First Round of the 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 03:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done and Ill find the tape. (I have NHL GameCenter Live so I'll check the Hurricanes archive.) TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 06:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Once again. Thanks for your edits. You did perfect expansion and referencing! I'll try and find more. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 02:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... I forgot about that. However the Anaheim OT win was notable for the massive comeback, the 0.2 Seconds left goal was notable as it was in Game 4 and tied the series and Game 7's comeback was notable due to it causing an upset. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 02:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have made 4 proposed additions to the page. You can see those on the talkpage. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 03:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll definitely add Paul Kariya's. (I'm an Anaheim Ducks fan.) TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 04:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've made three further proposed additions. Once again they're on the articles talk page. Replied!StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 00:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Heritage Classic is notable as it was the first NHL regular season outdoor game and the first Winter Classic as it was the beginning of the NHL's annual outdoor games.

I've responded to your ideas on the NHL lore talk page. (My responses are in italics.) TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 02:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added a Vote Count and a response to your Proposed Addition on the Talk Page. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 03:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied the text of the page incase the page is deleted so that it can be rebuilt. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 01:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go, I have backups as well. There are devoted NHL wiki sites out there that the page can be posted to if it doesn't survive on Wikipedia. However, I am trying to make the case, as well as revising now to try and gain a "keep" consensus.StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 02:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well the AfD was withdrawn. Now to figure out what's actually lore and what isn't. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 02:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was researching NHL lore a bit ago and I'm going to ask would you happen to be metalnation1984 on Gamefaqs? TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 02:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I hadn't noticed. Do you know why? And yes I am metalnation1984StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 02:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Keep with cleanup: I saw some NPOV issues and thought the article deserved to be deleted." as that statement was made by the nominator the AfD was withdrawn however by placing the article up for deletion for that reason he broke this policy

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD.

That comes from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 02:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I had actually noticed the tag was then placed on the talk page, and read those comments afterward. But thanks for clarification. I have added my cleanup and comments to the talk page of the articleStrangeApparition2011 (talk) 02:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	hi it is dfrr i saw your work on National Hockey League lore from April 11 2015 at 09:54 and i just wanted to award you. so here:-) Dfrr (talk) 08:57, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Meal, Ready-to-Eat may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• , but others are simply the equivalent of vegetarian MREs (Cheese Tortellini, Minestrone).<ref>[http://www.dla.mil/TroopSupport/Subsistence/Operationalrations/marc.aspx Meal, Alternative

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, GPD Win, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. czar 23:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:TOOSOON. Unreleased equipment is normally not notable, and this does not appear to be an exception.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GPD Win and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! StrangeApparition2011, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GPDWindevice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Majora (talk) 21:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StrangeApparition2011. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the National Football League lore page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GPD Win. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GPD Win, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 16:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Resilient Barnstar
	For your work on GPD Win, I don't think I have ever seen a user actually keep working on a draft over a period of six months like that, listening to criticism and working towards publishing and it was impressive. Most people give up after a decline or two but you kept going and it turned out great! EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 16:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StrangeApparition2011. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GPD Win 2. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, GPD Win 2, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of the references are unreliable sources, such as YouTube, or are not independent. Some of the language is excessively promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:StrangeApparition2011/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:StrangeApparition2011/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GPD Win 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StrangeApparition2011. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of lost silent films (1925–1929), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Neil Hamilton and Lois Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously kids play the PEN 15 game. The show doesn't ever reference the game itself, though, so it doesn't belong in the "premise" section. As for the source, again, it doesn't need a source that says kids play the game, it needs a source that the creators say this is what the name alludes to (even if it's pretty likely). Still, if a note about the title is included, it must go in a different section. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 23:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Hockey League lore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Hockey League lore (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yosemiter (talk) 16:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GPD Win-Face View-Open and Running Windows 10.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to your edit [1], "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material", per WP:CHALLENGE. Could you please self-revert your edit? Thanks, Rolf H Nelson (talk) 03:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, your reversion was correct, feel free to delete this talk page section if you like. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deletion (music industry), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heavy metal and I Am the Night. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people who disappeared mysteriously: pre-1970, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Death in absentia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Titanic (1997 film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 06:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Titanic (1997 film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you feel your edits merit disregarding WP:FILMPLOT, please discuss at the article's Talk page to get a consensus for your additions. DonIago (talk) 07:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know of any news sites confirming the above decedent has been identified but her identity is currently being withheld pending release via her next of kin? I cannot find anything beyond the likes of Reddit and Facebook. Thanks, --Kieronoldham (talk) 01:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am just wondering if you can help me add entries to disappeared lists. I am swamped with editing and can only do so much at a time. Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the reach out, but I can't make any promises. I'd see if you can find another editor. I'm just on a true crime kick lately. So I re-read these articles during downtime at work, and make edits as I deem necessary. StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 17:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is this POW/MIA list that you mentioned that this Bernard Gavrin unsolved death should be on and why can't it just go on the List of unsolved deaths? Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:37, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty obvious he died or became displaced during war. There are a large amount of POW/MIA, I don't see why they should be added to a list like that. All it does it water it down. Is there a list of POW/MIA? It's far more appropriate for that list. StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 04:28, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Airplane!. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The footnote already covers the change you're trying to make, and when you were reverted the first time you should have initiated a discussion rather than simply trying to push your edit through again. DonIago (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to edit as I feel necessary. I remember you. You also got in a twist over my edits on the Titanic movie page, when I was ADDING IMPORTANT FUCKING CONTEXT. Oh, but you're gonna threaten to get my editing privileges removed over two edits.

But I didn't realize that the footnote was viewable, so so be it.

Good thing I don't believe in civility. If you don't like it, then fuck right off of my page.StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 00:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it classy. DonIago (talk) 01:52, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Windows Vista. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 16:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just posted a thread on the edit-warring page over this. It is ONE editor who keeps reverting my edits, and they are not an active user. So I can't contact them to discuss it. They haven't responded to my talk thread on the talk page, they just keep editing it.

I went through all the proper channels to handle this. The other TM who is reverting me has not. So I fail to see why I should be held accountable over it. StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=1121120061#User:66.116.45.26_reported_by_User:StrangeApparition2011_(Result:_) StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You couldn't find your way to their talk page? User talk:66.116.45.26. Yes, I saw the report and responded there. Drmies (talk) 16:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, because they weren't registered user at the time they were doing it. I literally NEVER saw that page before. And you LITERALLY just created a welcome greeting for them, indicating that it didn't exist before. So how is this a question? StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 16:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And just what does that mean? "Reliable print media"? It's 2022, not 1995. A LOT of media is web-based nowadays. I shouldn't have to dig up a Goddamn print article from 2006 on Vista. And if there isn't a metric TON of web-based reviews and articles on Wikipedia, I don't know what is. StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 16:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From where I'm sitting you were spamming for a YouTuber. Drmies (talk) 16:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care where you were sitting. Linus Sebastian is a very popular YouTuber. He has 15 million subscribers! Hence why he has a page on Wikipedia It's about as stupid as claiming I was spamming for PC World. Give me a break. StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I note that on the talk page discussion another editor, completely separate from this edit war, agreed that the review should not remain in the article. If multiple editors say that certain content shouldn't be in an article, that doesn't give you the right to ignore them and add the content back anyways. Doing otherwise is certainly edit warring, regardless of how popular a certain YouTuber is or how valid you think their review is. The onus is on you to get consensus for adding the review to the article; as of right now, there is none, so don't add it back until consensus develops. SkyWarrior 16:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I argued against it placing "undue weight" on a particular opinion. I heard no counter argument or agreement with that. StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A "counter argument or agreement" is not needed; just because you disagreed with someone's opinion doesn't mean you can just ignore their viewpoint and re-add the contested material. SkyWarrior 17:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding the prehistoric section on the List of unsolved deaths that you removed, I would like to point out that Modern man appeared 315,000 years ago that would cover the timeline of the prehistoric section and that modern man co-existed with cavemen so history was being recorded even back then. Also a lot of the prehistoric deaths were premature as they died young, example: Anzick-1. It also says in the article "Anzick-1's discovery and subsequent analysis has been controversial". Also some of the deaths on the list are premature as they died young, so there is speculation to how they died. So I would say that some of the prehistoric deaths could still be included on the unsolved death lists. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I really think it's stretching things. These corpses weren't notable for any reason but that they were discovered thousands of years later. It's like claiming a dinosaur fossil was an "unsolved death". But I'm really not interested in getting in an edit war over it.StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Jurassic Park (novel) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 06:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 08:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2gether (American TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2gether.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Empire (Queensrÿche album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Mother the Car, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Runabout.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Surface Laptop 7th Edition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Windows on ARM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]