User talk:Tegel

Welcome to Wikipedia, Tegel! I am Explicit and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

— Σxplicit 22:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted it as a talk page of something deleted. but it wasn't 'nonsense'. That category is for things like 'gkytrtxlk yytrtdrt' or stuff that is so weird that it's not even surreal. This one could have almost been spam, but was too neutrally worded. Anyway, it's gone... Peridon (talk) 18:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will take the time next time to find a better reason. It was a copy of the text in the article that was designed as an ad. -- Tegel (talk) 18:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kontot kan fortsatt inte anslutas till SUL: det står på SUL-sidan att jag måste "type the global account password"; det nuvarande lösenordet här på enwiki är, till synes, inte det globala lösenordet.  dalahäst ^(talk) 09:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nu finns det ju inget konto på sv.wiki som heter Dalahäst, så det finns inte så mycket att ansluta. Har du provat att skapa detta konto manuellt på sv.wiki? -- Tegel (talk) 12:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sådär, kontot har anslutits utan problem. Tack!  dalahäst ^(talk) 20:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Tegel! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Tegel, Love your welcoming cookies! I have replied to you on my Talk Page as requested. Hope I have done it right. WikAndPen 04:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikAndPen (talk • contribs)

Hello Tegel,

May I ask again how I can find the relevant BLP-style policies regarding private information on the other sites?

Thank you

--WikAndPen 08:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikAndPen (talk • contribs)

Hi. If you go to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and then you have interwiki-links on the left side of the page. That is links to similar pages on other languages. It's not a complete list, but in some cases you can find new links from the other pages. -- Tegel (talk) 14:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tegel this is EdwestminsterEdwestminster (talk) 09:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC) a new Editor an amateur I am suggesting to raise a topic on the aspects of Tourism, there is one confusing aspect I have found in the aspects of Eco-Tourism and Wildlife Tourism these two types of tourism concept are the same and they create a lot of confusion I do not understand why you allowed the confusion to be placed in the Encyclopedia it does not make sense, please let me hear from you regarding the same.This is EdwestminsterEdwestminster (talk) 09:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC)amateur.[reply]

Hi. I normally doesn't edit here so you have to bring this up with the local community here. I suggest that you raise the question on the respective talk page Talk:Ecotourism and Talk:Wildlife tourism. -- Tegel (talk) 10:55, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would have done this on Meta if they had the Barnstar system there. Just a thanks for the Bxr usurp so I could fully unify my username. MM ◕‿◕ (What's up pup?) - (Chocolate Cakes) 16:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

For the purpose of scrutineering the 2013 Arbitration Committee elections, stewards User:Mathonius, User:Vituzzu, User:Matanya, and User:Tegel, appointed as scrutineers, are granted temporary local CheckUser permissions effective from the time of the passage of this motion until the certification of the election results.

For the Arbitration Committee, Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss here

Hello, Tegel. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

GiantSnowman 19:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your time and effort in scrutinizing the 2013 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee elections. Your attention to detail and expertise were greatly appreciated. v/r - TP 13:50, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jag gillar inte dig. Du är skit. I am going to make your life hell on Swedish Wikipedia. Du måste bli skit. I am your Wikipedia enemy. Jag heter User:Technoquat. --Bästkerring (talk) 22:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Förlåt, jag älskar dig. Du är mycket bra. Du måste lära Wikipedia mig. --Bästkerring (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jag kan talar tyskspråk och Engelskaspråk. Jag påstas var bli inte god på Svenska Wikipedia, främst med rengoring artikel och andra artikel. --Bästkerring (talk) 22:11, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tysken folk är inte bra. Du måste kör bil på fredag, din morfar tror inte du är tiggar i gatan av Max burgare- (Sveriges godaste burgare). Vad är din vitast blöja? Du kan på sig dina blöja i Indiska Havet för festdag. --Bästkerring (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Swedish doesn't make sense, so don't try to write in Swedish. Your account User:Technoquat is blocked here on this wiki. By creating a new account and use it here there is a big risk that it also will be blocked. -- Tegel (talk) 22:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tegel. I was proud to gather, as I thought, from the ANI discussion that the notorious Technoquat was my countryman, but I see they're not, they merely troll in Machine Translatish. Not impressive. I like "tramskonto". :-D Hmmm… "flapdoodle account"? Bishonen | talk 23:11, 5 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Tegel, this is in regard to my last revision in which I removed a date of birth from the page of a living person. We are worried about the inclusion of the date of birth, since we consider it personal information and would like to keep it reserved. I understand the date of birth is listed on two other live websites, but we are contacting them to request the removal of the date of birth from there too.

My intention is not to do "vandalism", nor distort the true, but most simply have rights to reserve a personal information. What if some other website lists a phone number or a home address? Is this going to be published on wikipedia just because there's a reference link that can be provided?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gvocale (talk • contribs) 18:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tegel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For helping us resolve the User:Zjec sockpuppet case. Thank you for your work across the Wikimedia and Wikipedia projects. XboxGamer22408talk to me 18:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really annoyed after what you did on Meta. Unblock me on there NOW or I will kill you. Peekachoo (talk) 11:42, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Threatening to kill me will not help you. Now I will definitely not unblock you on Meta. -- Tegel (talk) 11:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rubbing eyes. Who "created" that page? - I did, it was deleted per a RfD because I had used the word "amused" in an edit summary. I took care not to recreate it, but sent the content to an archive directly. You can study in the history how it was recreated but not by me. How can you tell a different user they created the page. I'd like to see it deleted. It looks interesting in red ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:33, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It was another established user here on enwiki that marked the page for deletion, so I recommend that you bring your question to that user. I was following a cross-wiki vandal that has been abusing multiple wikis for a while now and revering the vandals edits. -- Tegel (talk) 14:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tegal, As per WP:OWNTALK 86.134.212.2 is allowed to remove block messages, The only thing they can't remove are unblock requests and speedy deletion tags - Any and everything else is fine, 86 removing the messages means they've read (and hopefully understood) the block template but anyway it might best not to have an edit war with the IP and just ignore them, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for reminding me. I remembered later that en.wiki does things different that other wikis regarding the talk pages. The action was a simple reflex when cleaning up after the user got globally blocked. -- Tegel (talk) 12:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tegel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tegel, I run a bot [1] in the french wiki that handle the "Did you know" section on the main page and other stuff. It stopped working on the 22th of june with this message:

Code: globalblocking-ipblocked-range
Text: Your IP address is in a range which has been blocked on all wikis. The block was made by Tegel

Could you please unblock this ? Did you need the IP adress of my server which I could send to you by email ?

This is urgent.

Thanks in advance --Ghoster (talk) 22:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my talk page. DuncanHill (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tegel, I don't think we know each other. I'm a CheckUser here. I just blocked Web SourceContent (talk · contribs · count) as a confirmed sock of Daciproteasa09 (talk · contribs · count). You are apparently familiar with this case. Could you please globally lock the account? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have had some interaction with Web SourceContent on Meta. Other than that I can't say that I remember anything regarding Daciproteasa09. If you have any additional information you can e-mail it to me and I can have a look at it. -- Tegel (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tegel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would post to your talk page on Meta but unfortunately I cannot edit it because I receive the following message despite being logged in: “Your account or IP address has been blocked. 2607:FB90:0:0:0:0:0:0/32, you have been blocked by Tegel until 17:38, 18 January 2019, because: Vandalism. Your current IP address is [withheld for my privacy] and the block ID is #136683.” Until just a few minutes ago I couldn’t do ANYTHING on any part of Wikipedia while logged into my account. Now I can edit regular English Wikipedia without issues. However, I want to file a request for a global IP block exemption because this is the 2nd time in two weeks I’ve been affected by a block like this and 4th time in the last few months and it’s getting slightly irritating (not mad at the stewards doing this just the situation) having to deal with this when I’ve literally never committed an act of vandalism even dating back to editing as an IP address. However, I cannot file this request because I cannot edit meta wiki because of this block. I’m just wondering if there is anything you can do to help.--Rockchalk717 04:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am an admin on English Wikipedia. I have emailed you the information. I am blocked on Wikisoiurce, and Commons, possibly others. I have emailed you . — Maile (talk) 03:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He literally IDENTIFIES as Japanese-American, and explicitly asked to be referred as such. 217.197.179.200 (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article subject has no decision right over the content of the article. Please link to a local policy that support your change of the article. -- Tegel (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for email. As far as I'm concerned, there is an appeal procedure which the editor knows how to use because there's a declined unblock request on his talk page, and he should use it again to try to be unblocked here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]