User talk:TheLeaper

Georgs Pelecis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

mabdul 22:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

For solidity, this still needs any additional amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:East Winds Symphonic Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	I am so thrilled that you're adding the links to the AILLA archive pages - it's so great that you're linking the primary materials to their relevant pages. Loztron (talk) 19:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan George Bertelman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan George Bertelman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NepaliKeto62^{Talk to me} 01:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey User:Nepali keto62, I appreciate you being vigilant. I think I may have accidentally saved a version of my page in process as I was creating it, which is the version you flagged for deletion. It is a translated article from Wikipedia NL from the Classical Composers Request List. I left a note on the AFD page you created with some details. I look forward to a resolution of the issue and apologize for the error. --TheLeaper (talk) 02:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then be careful from next time and don't accidently save it before you fully complete it giving suitable references and links. Remember wikipedia only accepts notable articles with reliable sources. NepaliKeto62^{Talk to me} 04:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry too much about this editor's sense of urgency here - taking a fresh article to AfD after two minutes is very irregular, and general consensus is that editors should wait ten or fifteen minutes before even speedy-tagging an article. Thanks for your contributions! --McGeddon (talk) 07:25, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your input. I will try my best to avoid saving the article early in the future anyway! --TheLeaper (talk) 14:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove all affiliated sources (including the band's own webpage), as they do not qualify as reliable non-trivial third-party sources, and hence do not lend notability to the subject involved. Also, avoid listing irrelevant and trivial references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:East Winds Symphonic Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 20:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TheLeaper, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 20:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your article East Winds Symphonic Band meets all the requirements of notability. I applaud what you have created. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) (talk) 16:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

East Winds Symphonic Band, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

  Bfpage |leave a message  16:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the review!! I worked very hard to consolidate sources for that article. I'm pleased that you think it's a good one. --TheLeaper (talk) 17:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that five articles out of 250 edits is quite an amazing feat. This comes to 50 edits per article. Where as in my case this would be 18,053 to 69 or 262 edits are needed per article! This is as Bfpage. I don't know what the numbers are for Barbara (WVS). YOU GO (some non-gender-based-identifying-object-pronoun). Best Regards,   Bfpage |leave a message  16:36, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

→I didn't realize this was quite so impressive! Thanks for pointing this out; I really just work on whatever catches my eye. Cheers, --TheLeaper (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	You deserve about 20 of these barnstars.:   Bfpage |leave a message  16:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just stopped by to say "hi"! And that I enjoy seeing friends, especially of certain groups, editing ;-) 05:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC) ~Bush6984

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Thanks for organizing the Redd-up-a-thon. Not only is community outreach important but I think outreach to university faculty, staff, and students is essential. Certainly you provided the best swag and you had a pretty good set of slides. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheLeaper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is [1] in the public domain? Best Regards,

Barbara (WVS) (talk) 12:11, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable. The form itself should be in the public domain, but material owned by another party (the maps on the last 2 pages, presumably) may be subject to copyright. What part of this are you hoping to use? --TheLeaper (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

not sure yet. ~~

		Holiday greetings, you deserve
		An outstanding editor, you are. Keeping up the good work, much appreciated it is. The very best wishes for a joyful holiday are wished for you. Barbara (WVS) (talk)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2017!

Hello TheLeaper, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2017. Happy editing, Chris Troutman (talk) 05:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

I'm working on an article of an obscure Pittsburgh composer. whose name is Zitterbach. If you can find just a few references for me, I would surely appreciate it since you have identified your expertise in music. Also, do you have OCR and software that would take a manuscript of his and translate it into something we can hear? He has 1,300 manuscripts in the archives and most have never been performed, even by him. No hurry, I won't be active again until May sometime, I have to go back to school. Best Regards,

Barbara (WVS) (talk) 10:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting! I'll check it out. I don't know anything about him, but I'll see what I can find. Regarding the software, it's not too hard to put written music into a program that will spit out a synthesized version. If they have developed music OCR, that would be pretty amazing. I'll look into this as well. Sounds like a great opportunity to explore the music of one of our own. P.S. is it Zitterbach or Zitterbart? --TheLeaper (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I ran into Deane Root and he didn't know anything about this composer except that he has heard some of his work. Can you remind me of time of the meet-up? I'll check back on your talk page later this morning. Best Regards,

Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 13:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've been asking around and nobody I know has heard of this composer. I'll keep asking! There is a Beginner Wikipedia workshop today at 1pm to 3pm in Hillman Library. --TheLeaper (talk) 15:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I have class until 4pm. We'll get together another time. Best Regards,

162.51.225.44 (talk) 17:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerry Brubaker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorus (music). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might be interested in joining this effort in the Pittsburgh area: Allegheny Wikimedians--Pharos (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked into the definition of Wikipedian in Residence and you qualify for the designation. Since you also translate, you could be a Wikimedian in Residence. Let me know if you want more info. Email me, I've got a window of four weeks to discuss all things WP.

The Very Best of Regards,

Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 13:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC), Barbara Page[reply]

Hello, TheLeaper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Happy Holiday Barnstar
		How about combining a Barnstar with a Christmas Card? That is why this message is appearing on your talk page. Simultaneously and at the same time, this barnstar is conferred upon you because during this past year you worked and contributed your time to improve the encyclopedia. You also have received far too little recognition for your contributions. In addition, this is a small attempt at spreading holiday cheer. I've appreciated all the things that you have done for me. The Best of Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐  ✉ and Merry Christmas 21:05, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello TheLeaper, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018. Happy editing, Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Wikipedia:Meetup/Pittsburgh/ArtandFeminism2018CMOA. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheLeaper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have temporarily enabled the flag on your account until 2019-02-09. Keep in mind these things:

• The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
• The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
• The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
• Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 15:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]