User talk:MaplesyrupSushi

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Hello, How are you?

We had talked about editing of Namdhari wikipedia page a few months back. I read it today, and found there were many errors and the content organization was not optimal. I have made a few edits. Can you please take out some time to review thee. Also, I took some content from Satguru Ram Singh page and paraphrased for adding in the Namdhari wikipage. Whenever you get time, kindly guide for its further improvement.

Thanks Bharatavarsh.1947 (talk) 20:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bharatavarsh.1947 - Hello, you made pretty major changes to the article. It will take me a while to review them. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 01:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MaplesyrupSushi Sure, please take your time. It article's organization was not providing any clarity earlier. Many sub-headings were haywire. Bharatavarsh.1947 (talk) 02:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short subject:(Removed revision of User:DelphiLore

Hi man, i eagerly want to approch some intelligible and visionary editor for some information circled around the article based on Jats regime can you please try to remove the dubious statement more likely to be a Joke

I don't know which troll is editing this, but NO, Jats are NOT an "Iranian tribe". Furthermore, there is practically nothing left of the Zutt people, those Indus pastoralists settled in 6th-11th century Iraq, so to imply that proper Jat clans live in modern Iraq is a lie! The most you can say is that there is still a district (Abu al-Khaseeb) named after them. But you should remember, as mentioned in the Zutt article itself, that Zutt was a generic exonym used by Arab chroniclers! Good luck trying to prove definitively that such-and-such Zutt is definitely a Jat. Heck, geneticists and historians argue that the Jats of Balochistan and Sindh aren't related to other Jats, so first focus on proving that!

42.117.202.204 (talk) 16:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dismissing a historical link between the Jats and the Zutt people overlooks the complexities of migration and identity evolution emphasized in trans-regional studies. The Zutt, noted in Arab texts as a diverse group from the Indus Valley, are closely related to Jat/Jutt identity, particularly in Iraq "Zutt/Ahwaris/Shroog" are where identified with Jats, as This designation reflects a living continuity of Zutt identity that has adapted to the sociocultural landscape of southern Iraq. Furthermore, approximately 7.6 million individuals with Zutt ancestry currently reside in Iraq and Iran, reinforcing their classification as an Iranian tribe with deep historical roots. To assert that the Zutt’s legacy has vanished disregards the cultural continuity evident in the Ahwaris and the broader context of Jat-Zutt connectivity, necessitating an inclusive and evidence-based exploration of their shared Powerinhand (talk)User:DelphiLore

Hey nic to meet you I leaved message bellow your personal talk bar, Just wanted to assure you will vanish that assertion without any unwanted expedition to maintain harmony between both of us thanks alotPowerinhand (talk)

Thanks for uploading File:Khalsa College (Amritsar) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Akal Bunga original platform unveiled during renovations.webp. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Akal Takht after Operation Blue Star (1984).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ISKCON official logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]