User talk:Theyuusuf143

July 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm Bentogoa.


I noticed that you recently removed some content from Somaliland  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 11:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


July 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm theyuusuf143.


sorry i am still learning how to communicate here, i did not know how to explain something before removing. but i did it because MAAKHIR does not exist on the ground in somaliland or even in somalia. somaliland army never fighted against any group with the name "MAAKHIR". there are also no maakhir region at all . currently somaliland army are fighting against only one group called khaatumo after the previous rebel group SSC dismantled. its worth to mention that the SSC leader salebaan xaglatoosiye is now somaliland's minister of health after he made deal with the government.



Please stop warring, your at your 3rd revert. 1 more and you may be blocked. AcidSnow (talk) 12:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cabinet of Ministers of Somaliland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Minister of Agriculture: Prof. Farah Elmi Mahamoud ({{lang-so|''Prof. Faarax Cilmi Mahamoud (Geeddoole)''}}
  • * Minister of Health: Dr. Saleiban Esa Ahmed ({{lang-so|''Dr. Saleebaan Ciise Axmed (Xaglo-toosiye)''}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aynabo with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Flyer22 (talk) 07:54, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"I will desyroy all somalia especially punrland", good luck with that. AcidSnow (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Hargeisa. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theyuusuf143 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You should not block me because i did nothing wrong, i just edited indroduction areas of some somaliland pages t vandalized by somalian wikipedians. they changed every somaliland name into somalia and put their flag on our own cities. does somalia control hargeisa since may 1991? if no then why would somebody put their flag on our capital.

reason 2, same like hargeisa aynabo is not part of somalia since 18 may 1991, thats why i removed their flag. i also edited the region it locates, because aynabo is the adminstrative centre of sarar see (regions of somaliland). it was previously part of sool region until 2008 when somaliland president created 7 more regions curved from the existing ones and they are (sarar,hawd,maroodijeex,selel,daadmadheedh, badhan and buuhoodle ).

i am new user and i am very inexperienced, please do your own research to make sure who is wrong. i am 100% sure the person who accused me of edit waring is using multiple usernames. just look how many edits he done on somaliland pages. its shocking and unaccepted, thats what motivated me to sign up.

Decline reason:

Actually, you were doing two things wrong. Firstly, you were engaing in a high speed edit war, and secondly you were making aggresive remarks in your edit summaries. In this context, a 48 hour block is entirely reasonable. PhilKnight (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not going to respond to your foolish accusations about other editors, but you can't plead ignorance. You were notified (by me) of the first edit warring report and no action was taken against you because of your newness and because you hadn't received sufficient warnings. You were then warned that if you persisted in edit warring, you would be blocked. You did, and you were.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.

This is your final warning, STOP it. AcidSnow (talk) 11:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Look bro this is not your private property i have the rights to contribute here what i know best, you and your associates are trying very hard to discourage me doing any thing here. i genuinely do not want to create hostile invironment between ye and me.

but what do you expect me when you are not even allowing me do some minor undisputed contributions like i did in Woqooyi Galbeed togdheer and Cabinet of Ministers of Somaliland you undid all my edits with out valid reason, stop bullying me.Theyuusuf143 (talk) 12:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ugog Nizdast. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Zeila because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ... discospinster talk 12:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theyuusuf143 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Three reasons i should not be blocked for editing the above Zeila town page. 1. First i added its mayor and here is the facts # www.somalilandtimes. net/sl/2013/571/7.shtml # www.somalilandinformer.com/somaliland-turkish-engineers-embarked-on-fact-finding-mission-intent-on-to-the-rejuvenation-of-ancient-historical-sites-in-zaylac/ # www.lughaya.com/archives/21238</ref> Theyuusuf143 (talk) 2:32 pm, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui  14:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theyuusuf143 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Three reasons i should not be blocked for editing the above Zeila town page. 1. First i added its mayor and here is the facts that huseind iidle barkhadle is the mayor of Zeila # www.somalilandtimes. net/sl/2013/571/7.shtml # www.somalilandinformer.com/somaliland-turkish-engineers-embarked-on-fact-finding-mission-intent-on-to-the-rejuvenation-of-ancient-historical-sites-in-zaylac/ # www.lughaya.com/archives/21238 2. Secondly i updated that since 2008 Zeila is the capital of Salal adminstrative region after somaliland president created new regions. and here is the fact # www.somalilandtimes.net/sl/2008/322/080.shtml 3. thirdly i removed "awdalland" because they were unpopular and unsupported exile unionist organization who had no presence inside the region. infact the organization led by their leader finally returned to the country after they were provided amnest by the goverment. # somalilandpress.com/somaliland-awdal-province-intellectuals-denouce-the-formation-of-awdal-state-by-few-refugees-in-europe-24439 # sunatimes.com/view.php?id=2023 # www.somalilandtimes.net/sl/2013/620/8.shtml Note: since its obvious that somaliland controls the land i also replaced somalia flag and put the somaliland one. How thats Disruptive editing ? i am sorry if i accidentally did any other disruptive edits in the page, other than those edits i explained. Theyuusuf143 (talk) 14:20, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been doing nothing but disruptively editing since you started here. You have an agenda and you push that agenda in multiple articles, edit warring, removing huge amounts of material from articles, and other similar conduct. This unblock request is similar to your last one. Any more abusive requests and your talk page access will be revoked. Bbb23 (talk) 14:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


{{|unblock | reason= Dear [[Bbb23]] your profile says that you beleive "even if 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's still a mistake" yes i have agenda and my agenda is to correct the countless biased and propaganda articles about somaliland (my country) by these three usernames.[[Middayexpress]] [[AcidSnow]] and [[26oo]] i am very disapointed how you changed the subject and jumbed to the conclution with out even looking at what is wrong the changes i did to [[Zeila]] page? I swear i dont even care to be unblocked if you guys review the activities of the above 3 usernames. i am genuinely sorry any unconstructive and distruptive edits i did since i started here. please give me second chance to learn from my past mistakes. or atleast do something about the above three usernames who are bullying every one who tries to contribtute 1 word to the somali pages even if its100% correct and well referenced. Go to this this page [[Woqooyi Galbeed]] to see how one of them forced me to do distruptive edit after he refused me to add one single name he knows does exist. i also saved this page [[Cabinet of Ministers of Somaliland]] which they already eliminated. finally they gave up after long editwaring which he even tried to refuse and discredit my sources as you can see here. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cabinet_of_Ministers_of_Somaliland] they also diverted countless pages including this one [[Tourism in Somaliland]] i am victamised by those people please look my claims very carefully and give second chance i admit i did some mistakes unintentionaly. most of the times i have been dragged to the mistakes by those same user names i mentioned. Theyuusuf143 (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2014 (UTC)}}[reply]