User talk:Toby Mitches

Hello, Toby Mitches, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Myriam Fares. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —Aranya (talk | contribs) 15:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Aranya this was very encouraging and all the links were very useful, this was such a warm welcome, really appreciate this, thank you --Toby Mitches (talk) 23:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

please tell me your edit on chicken as I cannot figure it out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firestar9990 (talk • contribs) 04:10, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the Wikipedia page chicken by adding the Category 'Bird common names' as Chickens are birds and the word Chicken is commonly used. -- Toby Mitches (talk) 14:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In this edit, you added a thesis entitled The reign of Shaykh Khazal ibn Jabir and the suppression of the principality of Arabistan : a study in British imperialism in southwestern Iran 1897-1925 as your source for Emirate of Arabistan being a "country" that had Arabic as its official language. However, you did not provide a full citation. Please specify the exact page in the source that says so and bring a quote of the relevant part for verification, per WP:PROVEIT. Pahlevun (talk) 12:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pahlevun (talk), I'll be honest with you, I haven't read the book and don't know what page contains the information you are looking for, however I cited The reign of Shaykh Khazal ibn Jabir and the suppression of the principality of Arabistan as the source as I went on the Emirate of Arabistan wiki and read that they speak Arabic and used the source from there, I did this to help expend the information on this website, however if you are skeptical and feel the need to remove the contain, I won't stop you, hope I was able to help, sorry for the late response :) -- Toby Mitches (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, we all may be busy in real life. I appreciate your honesty. The problem is, the content on the page is disputed and as documented in Talk:Emirate of Arabistan, there are several citations that have failed to support content. That being taken into consideration, this source has been added to the article by the same user who added false citations. Regards, Pahlevun (talk) 15:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pahlevun (talk), that is understandably concerning, once again, if you feel the need to remove the information, I will not try to stop you -- Toby Mitches (talk) 06:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard where you have been mentioned. The thread is "Interracial marriage". I posted there yesterday, and it has received some responses. Thought you might want to add, or make a case as to why you need help. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Usedtobecool, thank you, I was unaware of this, I will make a contribute soon, I'm just currently busy in my personal life, but once I'm free, I'll add something, it might even happen today, once again, thank you -- Toby Mitches (talk) 03:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Toby Mitches , I found out that you asked for an investigation. [[1]] but Your investigations is not visible in the system.[[2]] Please take note of that. Vamlos is probably Rajmaan`s Sockpuppet. [[3]] Everything is exactly the same. Other administrator also think so. But I can't go any further because I've asked for too much investigations. If another user had requested an investigation, Sockpuppet would have been caught earlier.

I am no better at Wikipedia than you are. Forgive me if I'm out of line. But I really wanted to let you know. thank you.Bablos939 (talk) 11:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bablos939, I agree with you, I also believe Vamlos is sock pupetting but if the admins don't believe us or don't wanna help us, their is nothing we can do, I have also spoken with some admins and they have advised me to stop debating for now, I think maybe we should just leave Vamlos alone till the admins decide what to do, they are having a discuss here and you can also discuss with them if you want, but just remember be civil and especially no personal attacks!, be careful my friend -- Toby Mitches (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bablos939, I have recently learned you are now blocked because of this edit, I understand what you were doing and I even agree with you, that article looks to be WP:CHERRYPICKING and WP:ABUSE REPORTING, but you can't just remove a lot of information out of nowhere, you have to discuss it in the talk page before doing such a thing, next time you go to remove content you don't agree with, just bring it up in the talk page, wait maybe a couple days and see if anyone disagrees, than remove it, but don't remove the whole page or most of the page, you gotta do it section by section, discuss section by section in the talk page, hope this helped in some way, I wish you the best and hope you learn from your mistakes, it's alright to make mistakes, everyone does, its how we learn -- Toby Mitches (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Mitches Dear Toby Mitches , Your advice was a great consolation to me. Thank you. I will always be careful. I opened a debate.[[4]] The documents also confirmed the involvement of dolls and disposable accounts. There are too many documents that the dolls have deftly distorted in wikipedia. It's too cumbersome to remove one by one. Is there any good way? Bablos939 (talk) 12:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Mitches 'Interracial marriage' has an agreement, so it would be better to normalize the contribution.[[5]] It must be fixed at the point in time that it was deleted. If the user continues to interfere, I think we should apply for arbitration.Bablos939 (talk) 13:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Mitchell already said go to the talk page and discuss but you removed everything for the 2nd time disrupt editing and harrasing editor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Drmies.

Iranians in China is not the only wiki page that deserves a talk page. Also like Drmies said "illegal contributions" unless it concerns copyright violations (there are also no illegal human beings). A blocked user doesn't own the content. There are many wikipedia users who are blocked but their materials are based on facts. Also the blocked user was not the only editor to contribute the page, it was also contributed by several many other editors. Their contribution don't deserved to be removed.Vamlos (talk) 18:19, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Mitchell. I was correct when I said Bablos939 was using sockpuppetry and he was trying to fool both of us all this time. Indeed it's confirmed today those two IP is connected to him and he also used sockpuppetry accounts. He has now been blocked permanently. I told I opended a sockpuppet investigation. The two IP sock number, were single purpose accounts that only edited for Bablos939 sake. The two IP numbers ( 116.123.12.44 amd 220.117.225.165 ) edited for Bablos939 and never edited again, it shows evidence of them being related to Bablos939 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bablos939. Another recently pernanment banned wikipedia user is Skylandscanner ( Bablos939 sockpuppet account ) both banned on same day and confirm they are related to eachother, Skylandscanner is a new account out of nowhere open a sockpuppet investigation claiming me Vamlos as Watersinfalls. Since Bablos939 have repeatedly abusing SPI and accusing random users without evidence he was blocked from opening SPI. This sockpuppet account(Skyslanscanner) also replied to me and showed himself to be Korean just like the two IP. Every edits he made is clearly related to Bablos939.Vamlos (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toby Mitches! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Hello, I need help from an admin/someone who knows how to help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Total confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million people has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 16:40, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]