User talk:Toddy1

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 25 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Wikibreak	Third opinion $220	Chance ?	Mediation $220	Arbitration $240	Jimbo Wales $200	In the news $260	On this day $260	MediaWiki $150	Did you know $280	You are banned!
RFA $200	WIKIOPOLY									FPC $300
PERM $180										POTD $300
Community discussion										Community discussion
Editor review $180										FAC $320
Developers $200										Rouge admin $200
Deletion review $160										Chance ?
AFD $140										TFA $350
Wikimedia Foundation $150										Edit war (pay $100)
CSD $140										Main Page $400
WP:BANNED Just browsing	WikiProject Spam $120	UAA $100	Chance ?	AIV $100	Admin cabal $200	Teh Drahmaz (pay $200)	AN $60	Community discussion	ANI $60	Go Collect $200 salary as you pass

For naming references, I keep forgetting to use User:Nardog/RefRenamer. It's a bad habit I know. CNC (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To all who this may concern. I have noticed that this user, Toddy1, likes to fear monger newer and less experienced editors whose edits he does not agree with by pasting a you may be blocked template onto their talk page. Even though I only reverted once, he decided to paste this template onto my talk page. I am very well aware of the 3-revert-rule and I only reverted once. Newer editors may not be familiar with this rule though and would be easily silenced by Toddy1's actions. This is unacceptable behavior. Toddy1 please stop this behavior. NamelessLameless (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you did more than three reverts, so I warned you.

If you think that this is unacceptable, go to WP:ANI.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I haven't seen any problematic behavior from Toddy1.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 19:35, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

There is disruptive editing going on in the article Shool, but now you dont want to respond. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 11:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

. Please could you modify the edit-warning notice that you placed at User talk:Sid95Q#3RR to say which page or pages he/she is edit warring on - my guess is it is Shool - but technicalities are important. In my opinion correctly placed edit-warring notices help users, because they encourage them to use the article talk page, and remind them that they are reverting a lot. If an editor is not edit-war aware, it is easy for them to do too many reverts.

You have made a lot of edits to the article on Shool but none to Talk:Shool. According to the rules governing the three revert rule, he reverted you once on 2 August, and twice on 19 August, whereas you have reverted him/her three times on 19 August. In terms of expected Wikipedia behaviour, you need to explain your edits on the article talk page (Talk:Shool); and I strongly advise not making any more reverts at Shool for about 36 hours.If somebody makes a really bad edit that needs reverting, do not revert, create a section on the article talk page explaining what is wrong with the edit, and saying that the edit should be reverted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the editor who made this edit to your talk page is an admin.^[1] -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]