User talk:Tomj

Welcome!

Hello, Tomj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 23:28, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Refraction, note that the "see also" section is only for links that do not already appear in the article. It's kind of a "catch-all" place for links to articles that are related, but which for one reason or another can't be easily worked into the text.--Srleffler 04:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am mystified by your message. Please specify where you believe that I violated WP:NPOV by "adding commentary and my personal analysis". I do not believe that I have done so on any article, and it doesn't help that you don't specify where this is supposed to have happened. Thank you RolandR 16:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted and mistake pardoned. 21:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

fyi - London Mail Processing Plant is up for deletion. Since you recently rewrote the main Canada Post I thought you might have some insight as to its notability. Canuckle 17:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to thank you for pointing out the standards for my entry on the I-35W Bridge article. I was unaware. Thanks! :) twofish 15:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ever so kindly for your kind contributions to the page on Francis E. Dec (our only hope for a future). It is always nice to see more people take an active interest in improving and expanding on the article on this man and his strange life and times. Your contributions are highly appreciated. Thanks again! Korv McHund 20:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Canpar logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Canpar old.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've noticed you have added to the discussion on Talk:Quebec and, in response to the discussion regarding whether or not Quebec is a nation, I have replied with this. I would like you to read the discussion on the Talk:Quebec page, then read my response and leave your comments on it's talk page! Thanks for your input. Andrew⁶⁴⁷ 02:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, this was actually not a nonsense/vandalism item…someone actually published (maybe only self-published? but still) this idea and there actually was a Wikipedia entry for it. DMacks (talk) 17:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for pointing it out. Tomj (talk) 19:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Quebec, you will be blocked from editing. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Quebec. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Lipton1995 (talk) 16:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Quebec. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Oxymoron⁸³ 17:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tom, just so you know, I did block based on your report, but it had a technical error. All your diffs were incorrect — they all had an extra 'http:' in them, which broke the link. In the future, please use the 'Preview' function for all your posts, and ensure that all links you provide are actually functional by clicking on each one for testing prior to saving. Thanks, Crum375 (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are worried about the tone of the example on disilane, you should indicate why on the talk page. That is what the template you added indicates. It is an example. Why not suggest changes to the wording on the talk page. I am happy to discuss changes with you, but I do think that articles like this one need examples to show what the method can do. --Bduke (talk) 07:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peterson stamp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dasilva.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tomj,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

Thanks for uploading File:Road and Track August 2008 issue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Laurier logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]