User talk:Triplecaña

You may notice that I've restored the two notes chez Gabriel Fauré. I understand why you dislike speculation, but I think it is part of our function to report faithfully what the various sources have said. We have made it clear that these two points are speculation on the part of the source. Best wishes, Tim riley talk 17:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to explain that this strange-looking word "!vote" is widely used in internal discussions on Wikipedia pages. It's meant to indicate that contributions to discussions are not quite "votes", and the final outcome is not strictly judged on a !vote count, but also takes into account the merits of the arguments put forward by the participants. It's further explained here: Noyster (talk), 20:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have completed the translation of La maja desnuda (stamps of Spain). Good luck! --Л.П. Джепко (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naked Maja (postage stamps), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Se-tenant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HSBC Tower (Midtown Manhattan), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Real Deal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sticky Vicky at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You just moved Torre de Cristal to Torre de Cristal (disambiguation) (why?) so why does Torre de Cristal now need to be deleted? There's no note on the talk page to explain. If you explain it to me now, I may be able to help. Fences&Windows 20:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Triplecaña. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Sticky Vicky at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with DYK and all the best, Miniapolis 15:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sticky Vicky at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 14:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sticky Vicky, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as part of her magic act in Benidorm, Sticky Vicky pulled ping-pong balls, eggs, handkerchiefs, sausages, and razor blades out of her vagina? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sticky Vicky. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sticky Vicky), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, remove the too few refs template but please, please read ove the red links, they should be used very sparingly and only where something iclearle meets WP:NOTABILITY and is crying out for an article. Doug Weller talk 11:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Triplecaña. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per the above discussion, links intended to invoke the state of New York must be piped through New York (state) to make it possible to find links made to "New York" but intending other topics. Cheers! bd2412 T 01:11, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Yeah, for the articles who only have pages from Wikipedias of other languages, the majority of people who read the English Wikipedia and only know English as a language may not know who they are until they are created. It's sad, really, especially when if it is an article about a recently deceased person, as was the case for señor Pérez de Arteaga. --PootisHeavy (talk) 00:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! In response to your message: I am going to ask for help to find the sources as required for this article, which was the first I ever edited. In the meantime, I will delete the tag Cristixav (talk) 13:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...no thanks. Agradezco mucho tu mensaje, pero estoy muy a gusto en esta wiki donde puedo editar tranquilamente sin tener que aguantar tanta M como en la es.wiki. Agradezco también al biblio que me bloqueo y al usuario que después pidió que aumentaran mi bloqueo porque me han ayudado a desengancharme de la wiki en español. Solamente paso para revertir o arreglar alguna cosilla en los artículos que tengo en mi lista de seguimiento, alguna votación, como la de los ACADs, y espero poder votar en las muy necesarias recabs que nadie se atreve a lanzar. Disfruto aquí editando los temas que me interesan y espero crear más artículos que aquí también interesa la historia y los personajes medievales de la península ibérica. Este es otro mundo. Veo que también eres activo aquí y me alegra. Cuenta conmigo para lo que quieras. Un abrazo, --Maragm (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cambié un par de cosillas en el artículo sobre Legacy, pero esta frase no la entiendo: "There an arrangement made by the composer itsled for wind band (the bass are reinforced through cellos and double basses, with no violins and violas)"--Maragm (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Legacy (Navarro), Triplecaña!

Wikipedia editor Xcia0069 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good article

To reply, leave a comment on Xcia0069's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Xcia0069 (talk) 12:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Triplecaña. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Chrystalla Georghadji, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

scope_creep (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: I have added refs. Can you remove the template? Triplecaña (talk) 10:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Triplecaña, that it removed. WP:BLP articles need robust references. The article also needs additional categories. scope_creep (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe on your monitor, but now the images are no longer properly aligned with their appropriate prose. ww2censor (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I goofed up a new page for Lisa Marie Boothe which I spelled as Lisa Marie Booth. Could you move this page to Lisa Boothe for me? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjhantsch (talk • contribs) 04:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Triplecaña. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michel Camilo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We (the Research Team at Wikimedia Foundation) are building an algorithm that will align Wikipedia article sections across languages. For improving this algorithm we need the help of multilingual Wikipedia editors to provide true statements to the algorithm. You are contacted because based on your Babel template and/or content translation tool usage you know at least two of the following languages: ar (Arabic), fr (French), ja (Japanese), en (English), es (Spanish), ru (Russian).

(Note: by clicking the links in the following paragraph, you will be taken to Google spreadsheet.) If you'd like to help us with translating a subset of the section titles on or before 2018-05-15, please read and follow the instructions. If you see instructions in another language, please scroll down to find your preferred language. If you have questions about this message, you can contact us via Diego. Thank you! :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:58, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kantaro: The Sweet Tooth Salaryman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Savarin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lime (transportation company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Economista (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joep Beving, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:07, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cave of Altamira, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages COPE and Antena 3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Triplecaña. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Madrid Central.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Madrid Central.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:07, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Beer brands of Belgium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:14, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Triplecaña. I am just letting you know that I deleted The Super Station Benidorm, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which didn't fit the page in question. Thank you. GedUK  14:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Andbank has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:28, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Triplecaña (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is IP address: 66.81.169.157. Internet Service Provider: XTRA TELECOM S.A. I am not using a VPN. I cleared my cache. Thank you. Triplecaña (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block will actually lift in a couple of days. I cannot unblock you because there is no direct block on this account. And in fact, it would be best for you to go to WP:IPECPROXY and request IP block exemption there per the instructions. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Triplecaña (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: I will wait then. Thanks for the instructions. Triplecaña (talk) 15:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]