User talk:TudorTulok

Are you this person? ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 18:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on my talk page. ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 21:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are the songs featured in this sample? Are you the composer of the songs heard in it? Wickethewok (talk) 21:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, all of the recordings that you wrote and recorded yourself should be fine. File:Tudor_Tulok_-_Octrosall.ogg‎ might be problematic if any of the sound effects you used aren't public domain or are otherwise licensed/copyrighted in a way that would disallow their use this way. I take it then that you didn't create the songs mixed in File:Tudor Tulok - sample from 'Old Vibes Mix'.ogg? If so, then you can't license this audio track under a free license since the rights to the songs aren't yours to license. Wickethewok (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Thank you for clarifying. :) Wickethewok (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are makring all of your edits as "minor". On Wikipeia, minor edits are those that don't alter the content of an article, such as correcting spelling or fixing formatting. See WP:MINOR. Perhaps you have the "mark all edits as minor" check box marked in your preferences.   Will Beback  talk  20:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think many editors mark their edits as minor out of modesty. But that's not the right measurement. Anyway, thanks for contributing, in both major and minor ways.   Will Beback  talk  21:18, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 19:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(transplanted from Sssoul's talk page): Could you show me articles with such edit notes. --TudorTulok (talk) 08:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

if you mean edit notices: the Help Desk itself has one - when you open the edit window there's a reiteration of what the help desk is/isn't for. there are more examples and instructions at the edit notice page.

if you mean articles with "hidden notes" in every section: List_of_Gibson_players is one.

if you need to reply to this please do it here on your own talk page, not on mine, okay? i'll keep it on my watchlist for a few hours so i'll notice if you respond. thanks Sssoul (talk) 09:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, TudorTulok, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 19:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion started here and continued here: Progressive Trance section on Mark PEA's talk page

I thought I'd just let you know, if you are interested in finding lots more progressive trance without having to sit infront of YouTube all day, you should listen to mixes by Markus Schulz and Armin van Buuren, they are most well known for playing these genres. They both have a weekly show on Thursdays, Schulz's is called "Global DJ Broadcast" and is on at 5pm UTC (midday ET), and Armin's show "A State of Trance" is on straight after that, at 7pm UTC (2pm ET). I rarely listen to them live but download the mp3 from the tranceaddict forums (they also have a playlist of all the tracks in the mix) http://www.tranceaddict.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=6. The threads are usually posted live so sometimes you have to search through the last few pages of a thread to find the download link. Also see http://www.mixhost.net/mixes.php, they have lots of A State of Trance episodes for direct download. --Mark PEA (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your post to Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) again. Those sorts of links are not generally welcome on-site. I'm sure that you mean well, but Talk pages and the Village Pump are not a forum, and such "announcement" style posts are normally removed.
— V = I * R (talk to Ω) 19:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It is nice to feel that the effort has a positive outcome. It encourages me to work on more articles! Hugh.glaser (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The links to the Bach cantatas work so easily because the (new) names are designed for it. If you want to create an article on one (so many are open ...): example Gloria in excelsis Deo, BWV 191, 2 days old. Would you like to join the discussion? Feel invited! (By mistake I wrote this on your Music page's discussion also.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want your subpages to be deleted, simply place {{db-u1}} at the top of them, and they will be deleted as soon as an admin sees them.Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you see a vandal who has already been given a final warning and kept going, you can report them to WP:AIV- you'll probably get a quicker response, especially since only administrators have the ability to issue blocks. Keep up the good work. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Before You Know It, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Empty Buffer (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When I click on the link, it takes me to the jesus article. you just cannot provide a link on the jesus article space that takes readers to the article they were just reading. Slrubenstein | Talk 15:39, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The linking was only in the description and not in the article. --TudorTulok (talk) 17:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tudor. I have a question regarding File:Puppy near Coltani - 17 apr 2010.jpg, which you uploaded. I was wondering what breed the dog in the picture is? You appear to be its owner, so I assume you know. Cheers, theFace 17:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

in reply: This isn't my expertise neither, but judging from the pictures in the Doberman Pinscher article, I think you're almost certainly right. I've added the info to the Dog article and the description on commons [1] [2]. So now you know why I asked you ;-). Cheers, theFace 19:28, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you recently mentioned the idea of defining Happiness according to the love of an action. I just thought you might want to know the science of happiness agrees with you. I'm not sure exactly how you meant it, but they call it "flow" and it is a piece of the puzzle we call happiness - one of many things humans strive for.-Tesseract²(talk) 05:36, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there TudorTulok, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:TudorTulok/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The category was actually not correct; we categorize things on Wikipedia by what they are, not by indirectly related keywords. So a musical composition by a Romanian composer would get categorized as a musical composition, not as a composer — the relationship between an article and its categories should be "(TOPIC) is a (CATEGORY)", so the only things that belong in the Category:Romanian composers category are articles about the composers themselves, not articles about their compositions.

And even if it were the correct category for a piece of music, note also that the capitalization is "Romanian composers", not "Romanian Composers". Bearcat (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! When you have time, please check your YouTube pm's regarding the MoTR blog service authorship I have offered you! Cheers, H4RR7H (talk) 09:51, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 20:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Tomb Raider, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celeste (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are a smart bot. Thanks for the notice. I won't remove the notice. Who knows, one day you will become smarter then us and this compliment won't be enough for you, and will I understand how smart you are, and will you understand that I'm not that smart.TudorTulok (talk) 11:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice spirit to take it in. should get a barnstar ;)Lihaas (talk) 05:47, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TudorTulok. You have new messages at Codrinb's talk page.
Message added 15:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Am raspuns la mine pe pagina, sa tinem discutia intr-un loc. Codrin.B (talk) 15:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TombRaiderTheLastRevelation.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Titanium (song), without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Oz 03:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tomb Raider music tables has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frietjes, would you be more explicit about the reason of deletion of the table. I saw that you adapted it and simplified it... Hope to hear soon from you. Cheers! --TudorTulok (talk) 16:00, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reșița, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romany, Câlnic and Cuptoare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	good Hnjzhr (talk) 02:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you, it's the first one... Many thanks Hnjzhr! --TudorTulok (talk) 01:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any particular reason? TudorTulok (talk) 12:27, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gheorghe Bănciulescu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Corbu and Jiu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Lara Croft: Tomb Raider page, your edit caused a URL error (help) and a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tomb Raider world map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Soetermans. T / C 12:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thou shall delete and shall not wait. How convenient! What about the appeal for improvement. Ye shall vote in two! TudorTulok (talk) 22:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tomb Raider series Timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Soetermans. T / C 12:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thou shall delete and shall not wait. How convenient... What about the appeal for improvement? Ye shall vote in two! Oh, pardon, three! Oh Lara, my apologies. Misfortunes on the sea! TudorTulok (talk) 22:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TudorTulok,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rhythm Health for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Format: Reşiţa Demographics. Since you had some involvement with the Format: Reşiţa Demographics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TudorTulok. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TudorTulok. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TudorTulok. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug, thank you so much for warnig me that edits on such topics are sensitive and might lead to sanctions. This message might be automatic. I was adding a comment on the talk page of a sensitive article, I provided links and refernces, thinking it might help adding that "value" to the main article. I am confident that once the topic will become less sensitive, that "value" will be added to the article. I am not editing the article at all. The article is marked as protected when I was making my comment on the talk page. TudorTulok (talk) 11:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Fluidesign requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Htanaungg (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Reşiţa Demographics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You personal opinions about whether topics 'exist' or not are of no consequence to Wikipedia. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You could be more specific and less vague. If we take my discussion about democracy. I am stating a clear point, unaware that the main article about democracy is split into direct and representative democracy. The main democracy article could specifcy that most of the time when people say democracy, they talk about representative democracy, and few people have experienced or demanded a direct democracy in their country. The article does not specifcy the contrast between the two democracy, and the fact that representative democracy is not the pure form of democracy, but the direcy democracy is. TudorTulok (talk) 14:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make nonsensical edits like this. [3][4] As the articles make clear, being described as 'white' or 'black' isn't an assertion about people having skin tones precisely matching some sort of arbitrary criteria, and suggesting that people who have been described as such (or indeed, describe themselves as such) "don't exist" is outright offensive. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care what is offesnive. Scientfically black and white skin does not exist. You don't need primary school for that. TudorTulok (talk) 10:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you strike your offensive and entirely unfounded accusations that I am some sort of racist, posted on Talk:White people and Talk:Black people, before I report the matter to WP:ANI and call for you to be blocked from editing. Wikipedia isn't a platform for your half-baked and offensive nonsense, regardless of how well-intentioned it purports to be. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I should report you first. I think you are excercissing too much power here without realising. You are a true Wikipedia oligarch. ----- TudorTulok (talk) 11:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, trolltard. I could do with a laugh... AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caling me trolltard and my edits non-sensical. Is Donald Trump the Admin model on Wikipedia? ----- TudorTulok (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You could have a read on Quora, people of different opinons (https://www.quora.com/Is-saying-you-dont-believe-in-race-racist), but I don't think that people of diferent opinons is your thing. You are here on Wikipedia to perptuate your own ideas, and revert edits that don't fit your narative. It's a long battle you are taking on. You will get tired of it one day. No one called you racist, you don't realise that you are part of your own narrative, your own battle to protect a lost cause. My long-life choice of not using the word black and white skin, or 3D films, as it was marketed, it will not change, but obscuring the truth from the Wikipedia readers is a crime. You will have the epifany when you are old and look back at your accomplishments, you will realise: "what a silly Wikipedia admin I was in my youth, defending causes and insulting people". Live long and prosper, my feelow human. --- TudorTulok (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am 65 years old (and not an admin). You, on the other hand, are full of shit, and arguably delusional. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your age explains it all, why you and Donald Trump have so much in common. ---- TudorTulok (talk) 14:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Fluidesign boats. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 12:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need much more coverage

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fluidesign boats and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TudorTulok! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 20:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Oxford Road, Reading

added links pointing to Georgian and Irish

József-Csaba Pál

added a link pointing to Hungarian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fluidesign boats and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fluidesign and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fluidesign, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aaron Liu (talk) 00:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]