User talk:TylerDurden1963

Welcome!

Hello, TylerDurden1963, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on finding the sources. Go ahead and add them to the article, using WP:V and WP:REF as your guides. If you need more help, either leave another comment on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on this page right here. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on the rewrite, too. Still needs a bit of cleanup on the lists, but it looks much better now. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Social Work

[edit]

I notice you have contributed to the article Social work. I have created a new WikiProject, WikiProject Social Work. I have begun to work on this project and I would love to have your help. Please take a look at it and consider joining the project. Many thanks, Ursasapien (talk) 05:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baronetcy of Srebrenica

[edit]

Let me see... We are having 2 newly created accounts and 1 old account which has before edited only 1 article. If I start bullying we will have 2 or 3 accounts blocked from editing wikipedia, but I am not interested in that.--Rjecina (talk) 11:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is interesting how "my" articles has never been deleted or put for deletion ? If somebody write false statements he can expect that his statement will be deleted. All in all this hoax will be deleted because of me :) Mistake has been writing in article about Croatia. I am looking Croatia related articles for vandals.--Rjecina (talk) 11:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You've voted twice at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baronetcy of Srebrenica. Could you change the second vote to a comment? Cordless Larry (talk) 12:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I also ask where you got Image:Srebrenitzacoat.JPG from? You've listed as being your own copyright, which seems unlikely to me. Also, it looks very much like a slightly modified version of the coat of arms of Croatia! Cordless Larry (talk) 12:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Srebrenitzacoat.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Srebrenitzacoat.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/TylerDurden1963 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/DrHollisCollier for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 16:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block for abusive sockpuppetry

[edit]

Because of your use of multiple sock puppets in order to influence the Baronetcy of Srebrenica deletion debate, you have been blocked for 1 week. All other accounts you used have been blocked indefinitely. If this is no longer your main account and you wish to use another of those names, please leave me a note and I will switch around the blocks to reflect that. Once the block is over, you are welcome to return to editing Wikipedia, so long as that editing is productive. Shell babelfish 08:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:PubEdReportCover.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PubEdReportCover.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 23:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:ComadversVinson.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ComadversVinson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 23:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DroppingVinson.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DroppingVinson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 23:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]