User talk:Vcelloho

Hello, Vcelloho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Concerning Image:Vomit-67.jpg: you did not indicate whether this is a GFDL, public domain or fair use image. I am also concerned that there is no indication that permission of the vomiting person has been obtained for wide dissemination on electronic media. It is not exactly a complimentary picture. I'd appreciate if you could respond to these queries, otherwise there may be grounds to delete the image from Wikipedia. JFW | T@lk 13:39, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I have redirected this to Scouting, but I am sure that if you wanted to split out a separate article on the rank structure within the scout movement this would be welcome. I was a senior patrol leader myself, long ago :-) Sometimes a SPL is not a patrol leader as such, I was the group quartermaster. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 19:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock| If the reason for this block is related to my user name I do not understand the problem and wish to protest this block}}

Your account has never been blocked. However, you may be sharing an IP with another user who has been blocked. Please post the whole block message below. Sasquatch t|c 04:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Sasquatch said. We can't actually find the block that's causing you a problem unless you copy and paste the specific message you get when you try to edit. When you can give that to us, put the {{unblock}} tag back. Mangojuice^talk 14:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its no longer blocking now so something must have happened that fixed it but thank you for the time that you spent to help me. Vcelloho 02:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on the article.
Septegram (class of 1979--the Dark Ages to you)

Thanks for uploading Image:ARHSFrontEntrance.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Removing and reporting vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them again to the AIV noticeboard. Thanks. For more information on the available warnings and how to issue them, visit WP:UTM and WP:VAND. —Krellis 20:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I don't know what happened. Thanks for correcting the vandalism that came out of my IP adress. I don't know who did it but thanks for correcting it. I'm really sorry about the trouble this caused. -Vcelloho 20:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries....chasing and fixing the electronic graffiti left behind by vandals seems to be a never-ending task. HJ 13:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Firefox-tan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

--Iamunknown 15:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Vcelloho. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that:

You do not yet have enough edits in the main namespace (> 250).

Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Ale_Jrb^talk 17:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to check the abuse report page. I noticed you inserted your report of 206.210.84.5 inside the heading for a report I had made. It may not get noticed if you leave it there. The usage of that page is pretty complicated -- it took me a couple of tries to get it right -- and the instructions are here. Thanks! -- Gridlock Joe 19:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Vcelloho! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrb^talk 21:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction text has a link on it encouraging new users to test their editing/formatting skills on it, these types of edits aren't vandalism--VectorPotential^Talk 00:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'll be more careful. -Vcelloho 00:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of people make that mistake, that's why I keep the Wikipedia:Introduction watchlisted, just in case--VectorPotential^Talk 00:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure you have the latest version (1.36). The list seems to be Ok, and using an old, non supported version will generate that error. Hope this helps, Prodego ^talk 23:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm. I was using version 1.36 my guess is the schools fire wall was blocking it sorry if I caused any problems. It's working for me now from home. -Vcelloho 00:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken the "List of Companies" problem (what to do with an entire class of articles that get repeatedly submitted for deletion en mass?) for debate to two different places. This really needs to be solved once and for all (we can't keep debating the same stuff for eternity). Would you take a look at either the discussion on the Village Pump or the relevant wikiproject? Aditya Kabir 15:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i just gutted Camp Wanocksett. Look at some of the better camp articles to see why. Drop me a line if you have questions. --evrik ^(talk) 17:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. I've granted your request. Please see WP:RBK or feel free to ask me if you need any help with the tool. Pedro :  Chat  08:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know, while I agree that "LOL" can constitute vandalism, are you sure you weren't missing something a bit more significant? Cheers! Unschool (talk) 00:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I realized I had made a mistake in the revert but I lost track of the page in Huggle. I'll try to be more careful in the future. -Vcelloho (talk) 00:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, man, don't even think about it. We all have that happen sometimes, where we try to revert vandalism, but because we're not the only one fighting the fight, we end up reverting to a vandalized version. I just found this one particularly funny, because the net effect was to remove the relatively innocuous letters "LOL" and leaving the really nasty stuff right next to it. It was hilarious, and I was literally laughing out loud. No worries, just fun. Unschool (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. -Vcelloho (talk)

Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism at my talk page and at Wysprgr2005's! I have reported that IP. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 03:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For reverting the vandalism to my talk Wysprgr2005 (talk) 03:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Hi Vcelloho, Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page!   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 03:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

121.208.41.34 (talk) 05:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)mate she is a lesbian it was in womans day[reply]

If you can cite it that's fine also don't use the phrasing self confessed. Confessed puts a negative spin on being a lesbian. -Vcelloho (talk) 06:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added some suggestions to a talk page about racial slurs. Some were missing, and I'm trying to help. He asked me about them so I told him. This is not vandalism. IKnowMeSomeSlurs (talk) 21:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vcelloho I jumped the gun on the initial contribution. I'll respond shortly on my talk page. KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my talk page (and there was me getting all excited about the new messages *wry grin*). Kind regards, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 18:34, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you from me, as well. Best, @Kate (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace the logo on Episcopal Church (United States) until the discussion at WP:NFR has had a chance to complete. There is a history of people: 1) uploading a nonfree fair use logo from the Episcopal Church's web page; 2) someone uploads a free version they made themselves; 3) someone changes Episcopal Church (United States) to use the free one; 4) the nonfree one is deleted as unused; 5) an admin wanders by and determines (without discussion) that the free version is a copyright violation and deletes it, 6) and we return to step 1. Sometimes in place of step 6, we do a shorter turn of the wheel, and move straight to steps 2 and 4. There is a discussion right now at WP:NFR about a long-term actual solution, but for now, your helpful attempt to do number 3 only pushes this annoying wheel one more step around its inexorable course. Tb (talk) 06:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this I didn't realize what I was getting into, I was just trying to replace an inferior file type with a file type that is best for representing logos. -Vcelloho (talk) 06:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you reverted an edit by 99.23.90.235. He seems to be making a lot of edits to related pages, with a non-neutral agenda (changing neutral names to non-neutral names, and magnifying numbers of people in regions and armies without sourcing). You seem to know what to do about such things, so I thought I'd bring it to your attention in the hope that you can deal with it. Thanks. Duoduoduo (talk) 20:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now you've got me puzzled. If you think he's a sneaky vandal, why did you revert my reversion of his numerical change? Duoduoduo (talk) 22:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone all his numerical changes, but nothing much else because I wasn't sure. Duoduoduo (talk) 22:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have won the Eric Cantor-match! Congratulations. 1 week for the bad boy! Night of the Big Wind _talk 01:28, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. -Vcelloho (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that the National Archives Backstage Pass is tomorrow at 11 am. National Archives-themed chocolates and temporary tattoos await! Also, historical documents. :-) Please see the meetup page for updated information on transportation, security, and other other event details. Dominic·t 22:28, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & Meetup - Who should come? You should. Really.

FINE ART EDIT-A-THON & DC MEETUP 26 is December 17! The Edit-a-Thon will cover fine art subjects from the Federal Art Project and the meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. You don't have to attend both to attend one (but we hope you do!) Click the link above and sign up & spread the word! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to the National Archives ExtravaSCANza, taking place every day next week from January 4–7, Wednesday to Saturday, in College Park, Maryland (Washington, DC metro area). Come help me cap off my stint as Wikipedian in Residence at the National Archives with one last success! This will be a casual working event in which Wikipedians are getting together to scan interesting documents at the National Archives related to a different theme each day—currently: spaceflight, women's suffrage, Chile, and battleships—for use on Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons. The event is being held on multiple days, and in the evenings and weekend, so that as many locals and out-of-towners from nearby regions1 as possible can come. Please join us! Dominic·t 01:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] 1 Wikipedians from DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark, New York City, and Pittsburgh have been invited.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternate universes and omake theater in Megatokyo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternate universes and omake theater in Megatokyo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - doesn't appear to be the same one. The one who was executed was James Wright Foley. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I was reverting it back to June 11. And putting in the information to inform people that they have the wrong person and to not change it to say this particular person is dead. Thanks. -Vcelloho (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Odd, because that's not how it showed up for me. It showed with the "recently died" hatnote. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:05, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I made an error in my revert, but you fixed it before I had a chance to. Thanks -Vcelloho (talk) 00:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any time. That's the trouble with editing stuff that's in the news - too many clashing edits, no? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ecce Romani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecce Romani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Antigng (talk) 13:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Featured picture candidates. Since you had some involvement with the Featured picture candidates redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. funplussmart (talk) 21:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Featured picture candidate has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Featured picture candidate until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]