User talk:Wikien2009

This user may have left Wikipedia. Wikien2009 has not edited Wikipedia since 2 December 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Thanks for uploading Image:Ss of built like that.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OnLive Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Facebook has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 22:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create malicious redirects, as you did with Winning. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BurtAlert (talk) 22:37, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I delete your requested move to Libyan Civil War because there is a discussion regarding the exact same proposal already ongoing. All the best.--Labattblueboy (talk) 01:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Not Rich, Still Lyin'.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hi. When you recently edited Al Jazeera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fahd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think I have fixed up Template:Godtube channel now. Want to try it on some other pages? – Fayenatic L (talk) 20:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Lead sections that serve their proper purpose of summarizing the article's contents do not require the references supporting them to do duplicated in the lead. Only if there is information unique to lead is a reference for that information necessary. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ana kasparian 2011 promo photo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ashlynn Leigh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 22:23, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to rename my meta account from "Wikien20091" to "Wikien2009" because I want to have a unified login/account with this wikipedia account.--Wikien2009 (talk) 14:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on European Girls Adult Film Database requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 20:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you updated a few talk pages of pornographic actors.

FYI... They are film actors, thus they belong to filmbio-work-group. Also, priority hasn't been used in WikiProject Biography for several years. Instead, use filmbio-priority, sports-priority, musician-priority, etc... Bgwhite (talk) 08:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry I reverted all your changes to the sister links template at the same time -- I just didn't know what made the links break on some pages. FYI, I very much agree with this edit -- linking the category is almost always better than a page. Cheers, jonkerz ♠talk 15:36, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anna Wood (actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR. Only has been in one episode TV appearances, minor roles and unreleased movies.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits to Template:Sister project links. See my edit summary for the reason.  Liam987(talk) 09:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikien2009. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Wwe13officialposter.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Other file has been deleted, so this one is no longer redundant. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Wood (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Wood (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Andy Whitfield does not have an edit summary. Please stop adding external links that do not add any useful material for the reader.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Andy Whitfield, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". You appear to mark ALL of your edits as minor. That is grossly misleading. --Bbb23 (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Krysten Ritter, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to correct filmography tables per WP:FILMOGRAPHY, please make them sortable by using the {{sortname}} template where appropriate. Otherwise the titles of films do not sort properly and it rather defeats the purpose of converting them. Elizium23 (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In talk pages such as Talk:Summer Bishil, Talk:Génesis Rodríguez and Talk:Krysta Rodriguez...

1. Per WP:TPL, {{skip to talk}} is only used on "talk pages with lots of banners". Adding {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} should only be done when 3 or more banners are present. Most of the time, editors only add when four banners are present.
2. Per {{Talk header}}, it should only be used on "particularly active talk pages that attract commentary from inexperienced editors, and/or high levels of debate from everyone". The pages you added where not active.
3. There is no need to add |a&e-work-group=yes and |filmbio-work-group=yes to the same person. Filmbio is a child project of a&e. If you add both, only filmbio shows up in the banner. Only filmbio categories show up and not a&e categories.
4. a&e-priority and filmbio-priority values are low, mid and high. You have been adding stub and start.
5. Krysta Rodriguez is a stage and TV actor. filmbio-work-group only includes film actors.
6. listas is ONLY added to the WikiProject Biography banner. All other banners will get their listas value from biographies.

Bgwhite (talk) 21:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. There are a thousand things to remember around here. Nobody can remember them all, plus the rules keep changing. Bgwhite (talk) 05:27, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Tanya Hyde. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 16:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Angel Long, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Cresix (talk) 16:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your edits, and stop marking them as minor if they are not minor. And be sure your intent is to improve the article, not to push a political agenda having to do with the terms "British" and "English". Cresix (talk) 16:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert redirects of articles which have been deemed not to be independently notable.--Otterathome (talk) 17:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• don't listen to him.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:11, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with the AK merger you are invited to discuss it at Talk:Ana Kasparian.--Otterathome (talk) 17:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect European Girls Adult Film Database. Since you had some involvement with the European Girls Adult Film Database redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Gaijin42 (talk) 15:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that Playboy Wiki is an official Playboy site which consolidates links to other Playboy sites. If a Playmate has a Playboy Wiki link here, that already provides every significant link for that model's online content not only at Playboy.com (Playboy Online), but also at every other Playboy site such as the Cyber Club, Playboy Girls Network, and Playboy Plus. If you add a "Playboy Online" external link for a model, you are only duplicating a small part of what is already in the Playboy Wiki link. Wikilister (talk) 11:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Romani female pornographic film actors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 15:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Victoria Justice, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Cresix (talk) 17:51, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Prototype (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTCRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdann52 (talk) 12:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:American pornographic film actors of Irish descent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf _hideliho! 10:12, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Pornographic film actors of Brazilian ethnicity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 18:45, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many of your changes go against discussion on the talk page. Consider making your point there first. Ryan Vesey 18:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have stolen content from me. I created the page User:Auric/Lia 19 on 13:07, November 18, 2010‎ to prepare until I felt there were enough notable sources to publish. On 18:11, December 2, 2012‎ you blanked my userspace page and on 18:28, December 2, 2012‎, you created the page Lia (actress), with near identical content. Please explain yourself.--Auric 22:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note:I have restored the content you blanked.--Auric 22:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikien2009 did violate your copyright by creating the page Lia (actress) without attribution. I'll leave a note at WP:AN and see if an administrator can perform a history merge. Even if he had not violated your copyright by performing a cut and paste move without attribution, it was pretty poor form to create the article without discussing anything with you. Ryan Vesey 23:01, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely stealing, and definitely a copyright violation. You cannot take someone else's work and claim it as your own, period (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Underhand and sneaky, but neither theft nor copyright violation: Auric's work was saved to that page by clicking and accepting - "By clicking the "Save Page" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL." Keri (talk) 23:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Cut and paste copyvio fix. Thank you.  Ryan Vesey 23:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Vision Research Phantom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — kikichugirl ^inquire 01:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maloof Music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the additions!

Wikinium (talk) 20:30, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Prototype (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Prototype (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 18:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ATelecine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATelecine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 03:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kuniva discography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Discography of a non notable artist who was mainly famous for being part of D12

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:FrB.TG has nominated List of awards and nominations received by 50 Cent for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

Template:Blip has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Template:Sam the Kid has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sam the Kid has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cuban pornographic film actresses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 07:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Since you had some involvement with the Overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 13:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tout homepage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 08:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Godtube channel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 08:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D.O.E. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D.O.E. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam the Kid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam the Kid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 16:34, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikien2009,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bassmint Productions should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bassmint Productions .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:00, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blogger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sandstein 11:13, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Portuguese pornographic film actresses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Slovak pornographic film actresses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Portuguese pornographic film actors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Portuguese pornography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Prison Break articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Argentine female adult models requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Argentine pornography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:South Korean people in the sex industry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ustream has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ustream user has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fucking Backstabber. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 26#Fucking Backstabber until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Iranian pornographic film actresses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Iranian pornographic film actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:British Girls Adult Film Database movie has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Latvian pornographic film actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:56, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Latvian pornography indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Facebook page has been nominated for merging with Template:Facebook. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 83.168.141.16 (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sex industry in South Korea has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 08:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]