User talk:XOR'easter

Modified "primorial" method, called nabla-deltorial

[edit]

A modification of the "primorial" method was created, called nabla-deltorial, symbolically designated as ∇Δ(pₙ), and although the initial measurements of the "primorial" were ambitiously aimed at breaking (among other things) also cipher codes, it is still far from that. However, factoring large numbers with divisors of "intermediate" size, i.e. not too high - is supposed to go "surprisingly" smoothly.


The "paper" is available here: https://www.1universe.gpe.pl/prime/deltorial.html

I will soon start writing an entry about it on Wikipedia, its name will be nabla-deltorial ∇Δ      - I recommend it to your attention, and greetings to the titans of work...

BaSzRafael (talk) 11:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Don't do that. If you persist in trying to do things Wikipedia is not meant for, you will be booted from the site. XOR'easter (talk) 21:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes

[edit]

Saw a comment and was looking forward to arguing with you, but upon mouse-overing your username see that you are under the weather -- will still argue with you, but also hope that you get well soon, or see a timely recovery, or whatever is appropriate to the condition. jp×g🗯️ 22:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My device doesn't support mouseovering, and my disposition doesn't really support arguing, but adding my own well wishes / positive health vibes to those above 🙏🏽 Folly Mox (talk) 12:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks both. XOR'easter (talk) 16:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Was also very sad to see this. Happy to see that you can still turn out excellent edits like this seemingly off-the-cuff, and keeping you in my thoughts. --JBL (talk) 21:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My thoughts are also with you—just wanted to let you know I'm still (slowly) turning red links blue on bios from your stellar APS fellows lists. Take care of yourself. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 23:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My good wishes

[edit]

XOR'easter, I hope your health improves, I only wish the best on everyone, regardless of anything that transpires between. I want to ask, can we start our relationship as editors and people from scratch? I think we can collaborate nicely, and generate proper encyclopedic material. I don't know if I am seeing things wrong, imagining things at this point, or anything else. I just want peace, and a healthy relationship with you and other editors. Radlrb (talk) 01:23, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate in all sincerity your offering of an olive branch, but I must be honest myself and say that I cannot restart "from scratch" as long as you keep doing what you have been doing. I have spent most of today doing literature searches on topics to which you have made additions, trying to save as much as possible; I have tried to explain my positions as clearly, concisely, and unemotionally as I could. You have, as far as I can tell, taken this as an attack on your worth as a human being. I am too tired to engage further. XOR'easter (talk) 02:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel sorry then. I apologized three times already, it seems it is not enough. I don't know if that's then seeing that you assume bad-faith on my end, or not. However, it is a sadness. On my end, I will keep trying to seek cooperation, since that is the value-system I work with. I still wish well upon your health, and a speedy improvement back into shape, as well as a boost onto an even greater one. Radlrb (talk) 02:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]