User talk:XYZ 250706

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Communist Party of India (Marxist) into Draft:List of Communist Party of India (Marxist) candidates in 2024 Lok Sabha election. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. The source in the note clearly states RPI, not RPI(K). Also the final list of candidates released by CEO Karnataka has RPI candidate contesting from CV Raman nagar, not RPI(K). Stop adding original research continuously.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Dhruv edits (talk) 11:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change the color of AD(S) based on old and outdated flag. The color is not only similar to BJP but also incorrect based on the flag and colors on their socials. Dhruv edits (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello XYZ 250706,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nationalist Congress Party (Ajit Pawar) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Nationalist Congress Party (Ajit Pawar) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 16:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SEE THE Next Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election Page Marxist Economist (talk) 11:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Marxist Economist Please stop. In Maharashtra election, it was added because of the splits in NCP and Shiv Sena. Their previous election vote percentage are not clear. Besides the alliances of parties are not clear also. But in WB election there is not such problem. Please revert your edit in WB election. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:16, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tripura Legislative Assembly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opposition. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

78 is the number of seats it is giving to Congress in its opinion poll Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:46, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and please read the full article. It is clearly stated that the margin of error (MOE) is ±3% to ±5%. Please read it carefully. I am re-reverting. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta It writes FROM. It means that Congress got 78 seats last election. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta It has written FROM. It means that BJP got 109 seats last election. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the clear quote

"In the 2018 Rajasthan Assembly elections, Congress registered an impressive victory, securing a total of 100 seats out of the total 200, comfortably touching the halfway mark. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), under then Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje, was only able to secure 73 seats. Smaller parties and independent candidates together managed to secure 27 seats."

Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:51, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting you to re-read the complete article. You edit is re-reverted

Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for mistake. But the website should have written the second table more clearly. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is why it is always advised to read carefully before removing any content. Anyways Cheers!

Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, XYZ 250706 This is regarding your revert action at Next Indian general election#Surveys and polls. First if you are removing a data of survey, kindly donot remove it as a whole. The table should not be removed. I advised this earlier also to you. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 05:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Secondly, I have a source to cite the numbers and the video source was used as secondary to futher clarify. Can you please show me where it says that tweets/videos from official twitter handle don't count as reliable. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 05:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Previously Dhruv edits told me not to add video sources as reliable in 2022 Himachal Pradesh election. XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta You can check it in history of my talk page. XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can't see. Can you please cite Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go to revision history of my talk page. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The video source I was using that time was from Zee News. Please wait. Do not hurry to add opinion polls. The surveys at the time of election are more reliable. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta Please wait. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no rule which states this. Just to get your info right please read MOS:INDELECT. And a discussion at Talk:Next Indian general election#Opinion Polls. It will give you clarity regarding Opinion Polls. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta See Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election#Opinion polls. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for inconvenience. I discussed this with him either in his talk page or that of mine after this talk page discussion. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most probably that was not in my talk page because I cannot find that discussion in my talk page hisory. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta But according to the cite I have given to you says that he has discussed the matter on my talk page. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is in you talk page. You removed it at Revision as of 18:55, 26 January 2023. He says video links should not be used. But here I have given an article and a video only as a secondary source to clarify the doubts. Had it been just the video it wouldn't have been considered. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the article, the margin of error was not written. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta Do you know any editor who can make election maps? I need a map for experiment (not for Wikipedia use). XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is why I gave Twitter. Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard disscussion on Twitter being a source. All the discussions suggest that verified Twitter handle are reliable. Plus TimesNow has business verified mark. It is not just any other Twitter Blue because it's verified since Aug 2013. And blue started in 2023 only. So it is considered reliable. If you are ok then please add the poll. Because I am going offline for sometime now. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:28, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zee News is reliable also. Do not hurry to add opinion polls. Please wait. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:38, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added another link. Please see it. And there is no hurry in adding opinion polls. I told you above too. Please have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Election: Article structure#Surveys and polls and at the discussion at Talk:Next Indian general election#Opinion Polls. Its very clear that opinion polls after July 2023 (formation of I.N.D.I.A.) should be added. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 09:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @XYZ 250706. Hope this finds you well. I have reverted done of your changes at Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance. Those edits didn't seem constructive.

• Abbreviation- Please se the disscussion at Talk:Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance/Archive 1#Abbreviation. We only got votes in favour of I.N.D.I.A. And the Abbreviation in the article was clearly mentioned with a notice in this form - <!--Donot change the Abbreviation this is what was agreed at the talk page discussion-->I.N.D.I.A.<!--Donot change the Abbreviation this is what was agreed at the talk page discussion-->. I just hope that you know Wikipedia's policy on consensus.
• Patna meeting reference removal - Please tell me what made you to remove reference from Patna meeting section and add citation need tag. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 18:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta Oh sorry for removing the source in Patna section. That was done by mistake. But the alliance is only for Lok sabha, not for vidhan sabha or rajya sabha or mlc. So state seats or rajya seats should not be added. Predecessor of I.N.D.I.A. is UPA not UO. There is no citation for merger of Left Front. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta The state elections were no contested on banner of I.N.D.I.A.. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There have been no state elections yet since the formation of this alliance. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wider audience doesn't match your thoughts. It was never officialy announced as till when this alliance will continue. All the Left front parties are part of this alliance. So it's a common sense. UO is added as predecessor because it was UO first when all the opposition parties came under one banner. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See [1] XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a well established source. Anyways all those information are based on theories and common sense. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain what made you to change the Abbreviation from I.N.D.I.A. to just INDIA? Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta I am sorry for that. First of all, I actually did not knew about discussion. Besides I did not thought about the other changes to be made. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is the reason the notice was put there which clearly indicated the discussion. Anyways be careful in future. Cheers Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to CPIM website, Left Front still exists. As it says To make efforts to hold a convention of Left parties at the earliest and give a call for all-India campaign on a mutually agreed charter of demands.[2] XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta Besides, Left leaders have not announced the merger of Left Front. They are part of the alliance. That does not mean Left Front is merged. If you search upa renamed as india many sources will show that. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Left front article. It is not marked as dissolved as UPA. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 08:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta That is the thing I am telling. So why many editors have added in INDIA article that INDIA is formed by merger of UPA and LF? XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I.N.D.I.A. is a merger of now defunct UPA & existing LF. This is the best explanation that anyone can give you. Left is merged just like many other parties merged at one time into Janata Party. They to merged with their parties but later parted ways. Same is the thing here. The it is merged not succeeded. Hopw you understand the difference between merger and succeed. It has merged (temporarily) not succeeded (permanently). Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

XYZ 250706 HAM is a state party in Bihar. RLD is a state party in UP. Para 10B of ECI States that two parties can be alloted same symbol. Please see ECI website. [3]. Sharad Pawar is not anyone. He is the party president. He clearly said that there is no split. Ajit Pawar also said same thing. It's just that some members of a party have joined the govt while some are in opposition. If none has left party then its evident that they will continue using same symbol. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know JMM & ShivSena both have same Bow Arrow as symbol. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta RLD lost state party status in April 2023. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See https://eci.gov.in/files/file/15000-commissions-main-notification-dated-15052023-containing-list-of-state-parties-their-symbols-and-addresses-english/ XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta For your information, HAM is not a state party in Bihar. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your words regarding NCP do not make sense even if Sharad Pawar has said so. So why a separate page for NCP(AP) is formed? XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NCP (AP) clearly stated that it is a political faction. Not a political party. And if you see it also carries same symbol amd flag and had Sharad Pawar name in president. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi let it be like won lost & contested only. If a situation arises where some seats are contested in and out then we can update it like that. But we can't decide on that now. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta So removed the part inside and outside alliance. That's all. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta State/UTs column should obviously before contesting seats. For example State - Bihar, Contesting Seats - 4, then total for all states - 45. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah we can do that. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding election symbol.

I think we should add symbols of the parties irrespective of whether they are recognised or not. Like everyone knows that RLD will keep using Handpump as their symbol. Parties once registered usually don't get their symbol changed. What do you say. Because it would be easy for readers if symbols are present. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 08:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is unconfirmed that they will contest on same symbol. Even state parties sometimes may not contest on their symbol in every state. For example, RSP contested on Bat symbol (not usual symbol) in Tripura even being a state party in WB and Kerala at that time. SUCI(C)'s common symbol is Torch. But if you see ECI data for 2019 Lok Sabha election, you can see that in Bihar it did not contested on same symbol in every constituency it contested. I did not check other states and seats. That can happen there also. XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If RLD contests on Hand pump symbol on every seats it will contest (although it will appear as original research, but it will contest in UP only), then it can be added. XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked this account per a request on my talk page from the account's owner. Any admin may lift the block without consulting me at the user's request. Girth Summit _(blether) 15:07, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XYZ 250706. Thank you for your work on 2023 West Bengal Panchayat elections. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to List of Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance candidates in the next Indian general election. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

XYZ 250706 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I had gone to a self requested block. But I have changed my mind.

Accept reason:

Unblocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon I still cannot edit articles. Please see it. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you're attempting to use a blocked proxy. If the block notice suggests a specific unblock request, use that - other admins are better at dealing with proxies than I am. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:18, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

XYZ 250706 (talk) 03:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon But when I was logged in before self requested block, there was no problem regarding my proxy. So will I be able to edit after 30th October (the time of expiring of the block)? XYZ 250706 (talk) 09:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sachin126 @Maphumor CPIM and CPI are contesting together in 2023 Chhattisgarh election. https://www.abplive.com/states/chhattisgarh/chhattisgarh-assembly-election-2023-cpi-cpm-alliance-will-contest-on-25-seats-in-chhattisgarh-elections-ann-2508538 Please add it. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sachin126 @Maphumor Manish Kunjam is CPI Chhattisgarh leader and Sanjay Parate is CPIM Chhattisgarh leader. XYZ 250706 (talk) 03:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XYZ 250706 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

When I was logged in before self requested block, there was no problem regarding my IP address. So will I be able to edit after 30th October. If possible, please unblock me before that.

Decline reason:

Without knowing what your IP is, we can't help you, other than suggest that you go follow the instructions at WP:IPECPROXY to get IP block exemption by email. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XYZ 250706. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Left Front seat sharing in 2023 Zilla Parishad elections, West Bengal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XYZ 250706. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Sanjukta Morcha candidates in 2024 Lok Sabha election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Communist Party of India (Marxist) campaign for the 2024 Indian general election requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ShaanSengupta^Talk 05:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XYZ 250706 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but I have not used any proxy or VPN. Some months ago, there was a problem unknown to me about IP in wikipedia, but after that till now there was no problem.

Decline reason:

Well, you're on a proxy now. You shouldn't have a problem from where you were last week. Drmies (talk) 04:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, I am editing in wikipedia from 2022. Since then, I have tried my best to make the articles better with my contributions. Besides, according to rules of wikipedia, I am member of Wikiproject : Indian Politics too. I do not think I have made any harm to wikipedia. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies There was no problem last week. Besides tell me how to fix it. I even do not know about proxy and VPN. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies The reason of the problem of IP I had some months ago is still unknown to me. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your question: I don't know what "there was a problem unknown to me about IP in wikipedia" means. Yes, there was no problem last week--that's what I told you. Now you are on a blocked IP; last week you weren't. Please go check Wikipedia:IP block exemption. Drmies (talk) 13:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XYZ 250706 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but I have not used any proxy or VPN. I even do not know about proxy and VPN. Some months ago, there was a problem unknown to me about IP in wikipedia, but after that till now there was no problem. The reason of the problem of IP I had some months ago is still unknown to me. Besides, I am editing in wikipedia from 2022. Since then, I have tried my best to make the articles better with my useful contributions. Besides, according to rules of wikipedia, I am member of Wikiproject : Indian Politics too. I do not think I have made any harm to wikipedia. Besides is there any sort of exemption to IP block?

Decline reason:

You are not blocked. You've been able to edit since making this request. Yamla (talk) 12:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Yamla. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Nitish Kumar, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --Yamla (talk) 09:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Nitish Kumar. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla But I have added source in edit summary. XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not sufficient. Please see WP:CITE. Nor does that source indicate this is any sort of official alias for Kumar. It looks like an insult currently common in the tabloids, but that's not enough for you to make the claim that this is what he's generally known as. See WP:BLP. If you have a high quality source indicating this is what he calls himself, great! Let's discuss it! --Yamla (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 15:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XYZ 250706. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Left and Democratic Front (India), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance candidates for the 2024 Indian general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revolutionary Socialist Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove content as you did in Candidates of INDIA bloc. Full party name not required see 2019 UPA candidates page. Cross Indian (talk) 03:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You had previously removed 10,000+ content. Cross Indian (talk) 03:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cross Indian That is not called 10000+ content. Many editors have said to add Full party name and colour. XYZ 250706 (talk) 03:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See previous 2019 UPA candidate Cross Indian (talk) 03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove Sanjukta Morcha color Cross Indian (talk) 03:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cross Indian I did not remove it at least knowingly. XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not make a full restoration of an old revision if maintenance work - citation related, backlinks, date and lang formatting, etc., are done in between. Kindly restore the part you want, manually. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Indian general election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Didn't you get the first time? I explained in the edit summary as well as the message above. Do not make a full restoration to an older version since maintenance work related to references, links and URLs, dates have been done in between those edits. Restore the part manually. Do not edit war. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk I am well aware of the Wikipedia rules. But I restored the map with proper consciousness. I had given proper explanation also. XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean I then restored the old map. XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BUt you have also restored older version of the article in the process, which were not up to date as far as references and manintenance are concerned. Restore the map manually please . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You want this map restored? All you need to do is replace with it in the infobox only without touching rest of the article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the older one [4]. The newer map was undiscussed anyway. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @XYZ 250706 I hope you are doing fine. I am currently working on the 1999 Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly election#Results by constituency section and I am here to request you to join with me in filling up the data from the [5] in the table. I have already reformatted the constituencies district wise and the table can be found here: User:456legend/Sandbox/Andhra. Please continue to edit on User:456legend/Sandbox/Andhra, which can finally be placed on the main article. Thank you 456legendtalk 02:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XYZ 250706. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Sanjukta Morcha candidates in 2024 Lok Sabha election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XYZ 250706. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Communist Party of India (Marxist) candidates in the next Indian general election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello XYZ 250706. I appreciate your efforts to improve the article List of political parties in India, but some of your edits have been reverted or corrected, in part because your use of English was grammatically incorrect. If you speak a different language more fluently or require assistance, please feel free to ask for help with your proposed edits on the article's talk page. Please don't use an automated tool to alter spelling or grammar if you aren't fluent enough in English to know whether those changes are correct. There are multiple users who would be glad to help you fix grammar-related issues. To find out about other useful contributions you can make to Wikipedia which don't require absolute fluency in English, see Wikipedia:Task Center. Thanks! - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 08:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumanuil But your edits contain huge amount of wrong items of information. I restored an old good version only. But some changes in seats of parties are needed. XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one putting deleted files and spelling errors back. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 09:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumanuil No but I only restored a previous version with less informational error. You restoration has too many informational erros. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706

Recently you have deleted content from Parties & alliances section of 2024 Jharkhand Legislative Assembly election without verification. Don't do that. If you think that some content should not be in some article then first discuss it in talk page of that related article. Ritwik Mahata^t@lk 08:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RITWIK MAHATA First you learn Wikipedia rules properly. Then come here to notify/warn me. There is no term called verification. I explained in edit summary. You seemed to be quoted biased regarding your edits. Wikipedia is not the place for self-promotion or similar things. XYZ 250706 (talk) 09:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706

In your edit summary you gave wrong information. There are reliable sources what I have added. Ritwik Mahata^t@lk 09:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No there was no citation before that. Edit summary is explanation. I am saying that you should read Wikipedia rules before blindly promoting JLKM. You may have your political ideas. That's perfectly fine. But the way sometimes you are vandalising and making biased edits are problematic. You shouldn't do that. XYZ 250706 (talk) 09:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@XYZ 250706

It is true that there was no citation before your edit but see your edit summary. Ritwik Mahata^t@lk 09:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BJP is fighting alone for last 4 years. Even in panchayat and local bodies they didn't formed alliance. They supported AIJUS in 2021 because there nomination rejected. 49.47.141.1 (talk) 09:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@49.47.141.1What you are doing is nothing but disruptions. https://www.telegraphindia.com/amp/jharkhand/bjp-leaves-one-seat-for-ally-ajsu-party-to-contest-in-bengal/cid/1808872 XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In last panchayat election and local bodies they're contesting alone 49.47.141.1 (talk) 10:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't matter. The election article is not for local body election. XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have agreed on many of your disruptive edits. Now you've to agree on some of my edits. I have seen the link of the news paper you've given. It didn't said CPI(M-L)L didn't joined Left Front. 49.47.141.1 (talk) 10:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not made any disruptive edits and what do you mean by "I have agreed". It is not that I have agreed or you have agreed. CPIML Liberation is supported by Left Front. Even their posters say that they are just supported by Left Front, not nominated by Left Front. But CPIM, CPI, AIFB and RSP candidates are nominated by LF. XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you are a member of Bangla Pokkho. It's perfectly fine. Then I think you can read Bengali atleast to some extent. The article clearly says that it's just support, not an alliance. XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in 2024 Jharkhand Legislative Assembly election. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Sam Sailor 12:32, 29 October 2024 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

@Sam Sailor Can you please explain in brief. Besides I was following Wikipedia Not all rule. XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:NOSECTIONLINKS: for technical reasons, section headings should, among other things, not contain links, citations, or template transclusions. Sam Sailor 12:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam Sailor Is (===)  Mahagathbandhan(===) violating the rules? XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:50, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In such a case, put the line into e.g. pre tags: <pre></pre> so it looks like

==={{legend2|{{party color|Mahagathbandhan (Jharkhand)}}|[[Mahagathbandhan (Jharkhand)|Mahagathbandhan]]}}===

Yes, that would violate MOS:NOSECTIONLINKS as the heading contains both the templates {{legend inline}}, {{party color}}, and link. Sam Sailor 13:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam Sailor If there is problem in that, I can tell that almost every election article, atleast in India, follow this pattern. XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added

{{MOS|section=y|reason=[[MOS:NOSECTIONLINKS]]. For technical reasons, section headings should, among other things, not contain [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking#Principles|link]]s, citations, or [[Help:Template|template]] [[Help:Transclusion|transclusion]]s|{{subst:DATE}}}}

to a few articles yesterday. I am sure there are many more that needs a gentle edit. Sam Sailor 13:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]