User talk:ZX95

Hi ZX95! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Helen Zelezny-Scholz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Busts and Fritz Heinemann

Whinney Banks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Void

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	AHK barnstar
	Thanks for expading the maths section of User:Emijrp/All human knowledge. emijrp (talk) 11:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of the Iban people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Malay, Padi, Bulan, Charles Brooke, Lingga and Padeh

Hot foil trick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Scald

Stephen Birchington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Warden

United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Disclosure

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George A. Brown, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scottish and Glasgow High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tannen's Magic Shop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic shop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You recently, purposefully, added a redlink to Template:Campaignbox Maccabean Revolt dates (which I created). Don't get me wrong. I am well aware of the usefulnes of redlinks and thank you for redlinking Salama. The reason I did not redlink Salama in the Maccabee template is because of what happened when I improved and expanded Template:Neighborhoods of Jerusalem. There were political issues involved with east and west and the green line. But I was thoroughly trounced for including red links. I determined that settling the political issues was more important than fighting over redlinks. For the moment, those redlinks appear on the Talk page in a section entitled TO DO LIST. If you are interested (and have the nerve) to insert those neghborhoods back onto the main page, I will fully support you. (Of course, alphabetically within the appropriate geographic subdivisions.) As for those geographic subdivions and the whole green stuff, that was a compromise reached some time ago. It was a compromise that did not emphasize any one side of the political/nationlistic/jingoistic fight. I hope you will respect that aspect of the template. --@Efrat (talk) 16:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand. Is the title "Battle of Salama" politically charged? If so, is there maybe a more neutral title that it could redlink to? I'm sorry if I acted hastily; I didn't realize I was wading into a contentious topic when I added the link. ∴ ZX95 ^[discuss] 00:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no problem with "Battle of Salama". I was merely relating a past experience that scared me away from redlinks. Never mind.--@Efrat (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If there isn't a specific reason to keep the redlink out in this case, I think we should keep it in. I may even right the article at some point :) Cheers, ∴ ZX95 ^[discuss] 18:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Philippeioi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 December 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Philippeioi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that on some Celtic imitations of the Kingdom of Macedonia's gold philippeioi (pictured), the chariot on the reverse side was replaced by a single horse sporting a humanoid head? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Philippeioi. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Htou-tjyen, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the traditional Htou-tjyen playing cards (pictured) of Korea were about half an inch (a bit over 1 cm) wide? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Htou-tjyen. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

(X! · talk)  · @181  ·  12:01, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		We need more editors like you, that are willing to write articles on the more obscure subjects, that are willing to go outside of the easier to access Western subjects and instead tackle things that we really should have here on Wikipedia, but are missing. Keep at it! SilverserenC 12:12, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The RFC for TAFI is nearing it's conclusion, and it's time to hammer out the details over at the project's talk page. There are several details of the project that would do well with wider input and participation, such as the article nomination and selection process, the amount and type of articles displayed, the implementation on the main page and other things. I would like to invite you to comment there if you continue to be interested in TAFI's development. --NickPenguin_(contribs) 02:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, ZX95. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's article for improvement. If you're interested in participating, please add your name to the list of members. Happy editing! Northamerica1000(talk) 00:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for signing on with the project! Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, In the past few days, Today's Articles for Improvement has gone through many changes. We have modified the process for adding Nominations, which now uses a template/table format and requires only 3 supports for an article to be selected. There is now a Holding Area, where articles are kept for discussion before being selected for a particular date. The TAFI schedule now involves adding 10 articles weekly, chosen from a variety of topics. We now have an Accomplishments page where we will be highlighting our older TAFI articles which have now become quality articles on the Wikipedia. The Project is almost ready to hit the Main Page, where it will be occupying a section just below "Did you Know" section. Three article from the weekly batch of 7 will be displayed randomly at the main page, the format of which can be seen at the Main Page sandbox. There is also an ongoing discussion at the Main page talk over the final details before we can go forward with the Main Page. If you have any ideas to discuss with everyone else, please visit the TAFI Talk Page and join in on the ongoing discussions there. You are also invited to add new nominations, and comment and suport on the current ones at the Nominations page. You can also help by helping in the discussions at the Holding Area. Above all, please do not forget to improve our current Today's Articles for Improvement Thank you and hoping to have some productive work from you at the Project, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] (From the TAFI team)

Hello, ZX95. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Today's articles for improvement#Main Page deployment, or not?.
Message added by Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:33, 16 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

On 22 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Snow snake, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Native American sport snow snake is named for the snake-like wiggling motion of wooden poles sliding down an icy track? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Snow snake. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

On 29 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hinged dissection, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the concept of hinged dissections was popularized by Henry Dudeney, who introduced the hinged dissection of a square into a triangle (pictured) in his 1907 book The Canterbury Puzzles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hinged dissection. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gombe Chimpanzee War, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that one chimpanzee group killed off all the adult males in another chimpanzee group during the Gombe Chimpanzee War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gombe Chimpanzee War. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I just wanted to make sure that this edit that unsubscribed you from the Signpost is okay. Best, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 19:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive265#Move War at History of the Jews in Nepal, and RFC review that concerns you because you were recently involved with one or more of the related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the Jews in Nepal, Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 June 30 (History of the Jews in Nepal), Talk:History of the Jews in Nepal#RfC: Should we change article name to 'Judaism in Nepal'?. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 07:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Museology may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Museology''', or '''museum studies''' (also known in older sources as '''museography'''<ref name=museography>[[#Aquilina|Aquilina (2011)]]<

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZX95,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list • Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter • Translate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ZX95, you have tagged Sir-Kıvchak, claimimg it doesn't meet WP quality standards. It's historical tribe name and only a few documents survive about its origin. Can you please be more specific as to what is missing ? Thanks. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nedim! Maybe I should clarify: I'm not concerned about the amount of material included on the page -- heavens knows I've had my own experience with obscure and under-documented topics! The problems that caught my eye and led to me to tag the article for cleanup were mostly organizational. For example, information about the etymology of the tribe's name seems to be spread around between different sections, there seem to be more sections than justified by the amount of material, and the last section starts with a sentence containing "however" but it's not clear what is being contrasted. These are pretty minor problems, but I didn't feel confident to fix them myself because I'm not very knowledgeable about the topic and I would probably screw something up, or not know what to do. I hope this makes it more clear what I was driving at with that tag! ∴ ZX95 ^[discuss] 02:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZX95. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZX95. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZX95. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder, there's gonna be some. jp×g 03:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]