User talk:Davey2010 - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
• 2017 • 2018 • 2020 • 2023 • 2024 Notes Recent Changes

Dashboard RFA / RFB / RFC / RFO / Removal of rights Current requests for adminship None at this time Current requests for bureaucratship None at this time Current requests for checkusership Fehufanga [change source] Fehufanga (talk · contribs · count) Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I've been an admin on Simple for just a bit over two years now, and an oversighter for over a year. I am here to nominate myself for checkusership. Over the years, Simple has been faced with serial sockpuppeteers, from vandals using throwaway accounts to UPE account farms creating promotional articles. I have relied on behavioural patterns to determine cases of sockpuppetry. The checkuser tool will help me with dealing with cases of sockpuppetry that are harder to track. I am knowledgeable in computer networks and am familiar with how IP addresses work. As an oversighter, I deal with personal information that cannot be shown publicly, I know better than to disclose these. I am familiar with and have signed the confidentiality agreement. I also have cross-wiki experience that is sometimes necessary when dealing with sockpuppets on this project. Thank you for your consideration.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Candidate's acceptance: Self-nomination. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support [change source] Support. Why not?--BRP ever 12:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Having another CU & OS admin would be helpful to review blocks made by both CU & OS reasons. I look forward to working with the new CU. MathXplore (talk) 13:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Weak support Experienced editor, already an oversighter, no reason I can think of to oppose. However, I am a bit sceptical of the need for more CUs, hence why I am weak supporting.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] We really do need another active CU. There is a lot of work to do. fr33kman 18:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Back when I was a global sysop before I was a steward, I found having CU here and GS went well together because I came across a fair few smaller wiki vandals that had also hit simplewiki and was able to confirm them as socks using our DB and then block their small wiki socks and/or report them to the stewards. All the best fr33kman 16:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support we apparently need more CUs, and I think that Fehufanga will do great and be helpful. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Peterdownunder (talk) 10:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] XXBlackburnXx (talk) 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Fehufanga, as an oversighter, has already helped me in an excellent way, so I trust him with private information. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 21:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Changed to Weak support Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 12:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Rather have too many than not enough, and Fr33kman has been busy of late. Fehufanga is already an oversighter, so trust is alrady there. I'll take them at their work on their networking knowledge. Ravensfire (talk) 12:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] 110% Support - Fehufanga does amazing work here blocking the trolls/vandals and so without a shadow of doubt they'd be an asset to the CU team. Honestly can't think of a more perfect candidate for CU than Fehufanga tbh, Easy support. –Davey2010Talk 18:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support I feel my initial comment addressing the amount of checkusers we have might have been misinterpreted – Fehufanga is no doubt an excellent candidate, I was simply unsure on expanding our number of checkusers and didn't want to alter the existing team. That being said, I don't think this needs to be addressed by any change to the existing inactive admins policy – the two checkusers inactive for the moment have done an exceptional amount of CheckUser work in the fairly recent past and will likely return to activity in the future. Peterdownunder also commented his intention to resign as checkuser. This was all a minor concern I had, not about Fehufanga of course, that I don't think was a big deal. Fehufanga is already experienced and active in cross-wiki and oversight work and would make a great fit into the checkuser team, this is a very obvious support. --Ferien (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Jianhui67 T★C 11:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Ternera (talk) 13:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support I hope to see you join the team. Operator873 connect 01:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Active administrator, will do very well for a CheckUser. Kurnahusa (talk) 23:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] SupportQueen of Hearts (talk) 06:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support I don't see a reason not to grant CU. Justarandomamerican (t • c) 14:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Good candidate 20th vote. TyphoonAmpil (talk) 03:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose [change source] Weak oppose per ferien Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Cactusisme, if you have changed your vote, please move it to the relevant section. --Ferien2 (talk) 13:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]  Done Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 11:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Comments [change source] @Fehufanga Aren't you a global sysop? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 12:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Cactusisme I am, but I feel that that's not too relevant with my chcekusership request.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] I know, just a question. Sorry Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 13:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Cactusisme Global sysops don't have anything to do with checkusers (global or local).- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] No, but the two roles can overlap as I mentioned above. fr33kman 18:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Let me stress that this is a brilliant editor for the role and I do not intend to oppose this request, especially not based on the candidate. If the checkusers say there is a need then I will believe them and agree there is likely a need, but I do understand the concerns from FusionSub. Should this request pass, a majority of administrators will also be checkusers (8 out of 15). I appreciate we are currently at a low administrator count overall over the past few years, but that is still a really large amount. It'd put as as the wiki with the third most checkusers of all Wikimedia projects, tied with MetaWiki, but they have 68 administrators. Itwiki have over 100 admins for 10 checkusers, and enwiki have 850 for 50 checkusers. I don't think it's unreasonable to consider that we would have a disproportionate number of checkusers for our wiki, even accounting for the abuse we get from enwiki. It's not that I don't trust Fehufanga with the CheckUser information of course, but that that sort of information should be in as few people's hands as possible. --Ferien (talk) 19:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] It's not that there aren't enough people with the flag, it's that there isn't enough people using the tool. For RFCU it's basically almost just me and Eptalon servicing the requests. The semi-active admins may be editing but they're not using the tool. Bsadowski1 and Vermont are using the tool regularly but those uses are almost always xwiki/lta/SPI uses. I know Eptalon works full time and he's finding hard to keep up as am i. Each request can take minutes to over an hour to complete. Another CU working the queue will help out a lot. fr33kman 19:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Perhaps a policy should be written that'd state what criteria would denote an in-active CU and when the tool should be removed as we did with the inactive admins policy. fr33kman 19:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Fr33kman the policy globally is Any user account with CheckUser status that is inactive for more than one year will have their CheckUser access removed (m:Checkuser policy). If I remember correctly, local policies can be stricter, such as mandating a reelection every six month or so, I believe this is the case in some wikis. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Yeah, I know the global policy, I propose it be stricter policy locally. I can assure you that because of our closer relationship with enwiki we get more than should be our statical share of the CU actions per month. When I was a steward I noticed that wikis with similar size and language group gets far less investigations monthly. I think asking each user with the check user flag should be active enough to do at least one time using CU is not to much or unfair to ask in the spirit of our RfCU elections. The people taking park in the election expect that the user would actively use them. And not hold off 9 months or whatever doesn't have the time to take a case on RfCU now and again is unfair. I'm proposing that we RfDCU those haven't been an '''active''' CU during that time has not shown a need for the hat. You shouldn't have it. It's not a beauty contest , (joke)(joke). Seriously every CU could proform a set number of CU actions during 6 months .I proposed [[WP:Inactive administrators]] and that has deadmined a few admins. I hate to say it, "use it or lose it". It's not fair two or sometimes three people on average, have to exclusively service RfCU requests. We're volunteers 🙂 fr33kman 00:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Agree with the above. I would prefer/like to step down as CU as it is a role that has become more technically complex than I am prepared to deal with. I think it is a tool that requires a more active editor than I am able to do in the foreseeable future. Peterdownunder (talk) 10:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Peterdownunder you can always request the removal of your own permissions... Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 22:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] Current requests for oversightership None at this time Current requests for removal of rights None at this time Purge

Article EN Next update Chvrches discography EN 18 Sep 2024 Eminem albums discography EN Sash! discography EN N-Dubz discography EN Eminem singles discography EN Demi Lovato discography EN List of songs recorded by Demi Lovato EN Charli XCX discography EN List of songs written by Charli XCX EN Robbie Williams discography EN List of songs recorded by Robbie Williams EN Madison Beer discography EN Justin Bieber discography EN Nicki Minaj discography EN Daddy Yankee discography EN ASAP Rocky discography EN Iggy Azalea discography EN List of songs recorded by Iggy Azalea EN Katy Perry discography EN List of songs recorded by Katy Perry EN Ludacris discography EN Chamillionaire discography EN Ariana Grande discography EN List of songs recorded by Ariana Grande ‎ EN Ariana Grande videography EN List of Ariana Grande live performances EN List of awards and nominations received by Ariana Grande EN [[]] EN [[]] EN [[]] EN [[]] EN [[]] EN [[]] EN edit

Codes: (edit) | {{enwp based|url=}} {{noping|}} <div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #EDEAFF; padding: 0px 10px 0px 10px; border: 1px solid #8779DD;"> :''The following discussion is closed. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.'' ---- {{deleted|}} ~~~~ ---- :''The above discussion is preserved as an [[Help:Archiving a talk page|archive]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not change it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.''</div>

Waterloo Road - Create individual series pages, fix Ep list mess (footnotes) –Davey2010^Talk 02:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VWGolf- Fix article, fix links (ie MK etc) –Davey2010^Talk 02:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Volkswagen Golf –Davey2010^Talk 20:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

130.45.138.72 –Davey2010^Talk 17:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IPs - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iWGGy1CtMGO_opYgjvqgfI-ptXYt_xkAHBjlkrckCb4/edit –Davey2010^Talk 10:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BoldBlaze and the Monster Machines –Davey2010^Talk 20:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add definetions of state-funded etc to List of schools in Medway and List of schools in Kent –Davey2010^Talk 14:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check edits:

• 2600:1700:9F83:1800:A8F1:6C61:8A3F:985A
• 86.14.78.245 –Davey2010^Talk 21:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rainham_School_for_Girls&curid=1126742&diff=9729176&oldid=9695476 –Davey2010^Talk 22:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just saying it seems like User:Davey2010/RedWarn/Default Warnings is in the possible copyright violations category. This seems to be be because it has JSON containing this:

"name": "Removing {{copyvio}} template from articles" 

I am fairly confident that is not your intent, but I don't know what parser you use with that JSON so I'm not sure how to stop the template from being transcluded there. — 76.212.74.243 (talk) 22:30, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @76.212.74.243, Many thanks for letting me know I had no idea it showed there - I've blanked the page for now, Thanks again, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I still want to ask, on what grounds did you undo my edits in articles that literally contained false information, which directly violates the rules of the project? Skerpsov (talk) 14:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Skerpsov, You re-added vandalism here[1] so I therefore believed you were a sock of the IP, If you don't want to be reverted then I would respectfully suggest you don't re-add vandalism that block-evading IPs are adding, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, have you thought of returning to WM Commons? It has been over a year since your indef block there. I apologise if this question upset you. A1Cafel (talk) 09:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @A1Cafel, Many thanks for your comment,

In short no - They weren't interested in unblocking me in August and I highly doubt anything's changed since to be honest. And plus they'd no doubt use the block on here to say "he's clearly not learned his lesson" or some bs excuse, so yeah unless they unblock me as time served then my block expiration date there won't be changing anytime in my lifetime unfortunately,

I of course regret what I said and that I'm the only person responsible for my words 110% but in some ways I also feel resentful at how I was treated or how it was handled - It just felt like "Oh he swore me, indef for him" and even 2 months later that didn't change despite me apologising and saying I would do things differently,

But yeah no I'm happy without Commons to be honest, Of course I'd love to edit there again but too much has been said and done and that bridge has unfortunately been burnt,

I'm happy enough on here and EN so it's all good :), Have a great day, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://goodcalculators.com/flesch-kincaid-calculator/ –Davey2010^Talk 19:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think people need to know that they borrowed a train for a couple of journeys 22 years ago? Rathfelder (talk) 16:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was a part of history and because it's sourced ?.... –Davey2010^Talk 16:18, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesnt seem very significant. Rathfelder (talk) 16:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's your opinion, Have a great day, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why does List of SpongeBob SquarePants cast members need QDing? G6 is not valid. Thx fr33kman 21:57, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fr33kman, I didn't know if this was associated with an LTA so thought it was best it was started from fresh, I know a few TV shows attract LTAs but maybe this IP is fine and I guess any future others, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:03, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not edit warring. Ciaran.london (talk) 23:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this says otherwise. –Davey2010^Talk 23:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not revert any of my changes! I beg of you! 93.40.45.95 (talk) 05:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then don't add unsourced content. –Davey2010^Talk 11:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, if I add unsourced content, my change will be reverted and I will probably get blocked, right? 5.180.207.80 (talk) 11:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes that is correct, If you're adding cast members to a article than all's you need to do is a find a news article that says they were in that show, unfortunately IMDb cannot be used (see en:WP:Citing IMDb), Hope this helps, Thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question: can Behind The Voice Actors (https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com) be used as a citation for certain cast members? 5.180.207.80 (talk) 11:44, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It can't as it's a fan-made website, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since "Behind The Voice Actors" is a fan-made website, it cannot be used as a citation for certain cast members. Thanks for the support and have a nice day, Davey. 5.180.207.80 (talk) 11:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You know you can create an account, right? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 11:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Thanks and you have a nice day too, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, there's something else I need to tell you. Profanity, sexual themes, nudity, and all other things are not allowed in any Wikipedia, especially the Simple English Wikipedia (this one). If somebody will put any of these in a Wikipedia page (for example Oijfeaoijgeagea), his/her change will be reverted and he/she will probably get blocked. For example, Oijfeaoijgeagea got blocked indefinitely after doing some disruptive editing.

I don't know any news articles that can be used as a citation for some cast members. If there's one I know, I will return. If there aren't any news articles I know, then there is no desire to return. Thanks and have a nice day. 93.33.22.207 (talk) 12:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 12:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the final word: if any profanity, sexual themes, nudity, etc. is found in a Wikipedia page, it will be deleted and somebody might block the man who inserted one of those things I've mentioned earlier. Bye! 93.33.22.207 (talk) 12:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my talkpage and as such I get the final word here and it's this; go read en:WP:NOTCENSORED, images showing the human anatomy are allowed and are fine, If you have a problem with it then go to WP:Simple talk and propose changes, Until then images stay as are. –Davey2010^Talk 14:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, even though this is your talk page. Thanks and have a nice day. 93.33.22.207 (talk) 14:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you too, –Davey2010^Talk 14:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Davey. I noticed that you did a change to Ice Age (2002 movie), and here's what you did: you copied and pasted the cast list of that movie from the English Wikipedia. In addition, there are some voice actors that were not mentioned in the English Wikipedia:

• Stephen Root also voiced Start #1;
• Alan Tudyk also voiced Dodo #4 and Freaky Mammal #2;
• Chris Wedge also voiced Dodo #5;
• Tara Strong also voiced Start #2;
• Peter Ackerman as Dodo #1. Ackerman also voiced Freaky Mammal #1;
• P. J. Benjamin as Dodo #2;
• Josh Hamilton as Dodo #3. Hamilton also voiced Aardvark;
• Denny Dillon as Glypto #1;
• Mitzi McCall as Glypto #2.

All of these voice actors are credited in the ending credits of that movie. This is all I can tell you for now. Thank you so much and I hope you have a nice day. 5.180.207.80 (talk) 17:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've reinstated your edits as you're indeed correct they did voice those characters too, –Davey2010^Talk 18:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! In addition, you said: "Appreciate this isn't the normal way of citing however bar end credits there's nothing else confirming these and obviously I cannot link to said credits as they're copyright violations anyway"
Have a nice day! 93.40.82.17 (talk) 06:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and no worries, Have a nice day too, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 10:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me appeal because the administer made it so I cannot even appeal on my talk page!!!!!! 132.147.192.240 (talk) 18:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I can't sorry - I would kindly suggest you don't trout people or leave anyone any messages there (that includes saying hi to everyone everywhere) - Once your block expires in a month focus on articles and improving the encyclopedia, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there I just wanted to say that the edits that were provided were up to date edits. McClanahan died in 2010 not 2024. Details were provided. For Scorsese he directs more than just movies if you take a look at his filmography. The information on the rappers are currently up to date also. The information was outdated. If you have any concerns leave a message on my talk page. Thank you 108.2.126.127 (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 108.2.126.127 (talk, Please accept my sincere apologies, I saw your edits to the Busta Rhymes article and compared it with the English Wikipedia version and one addition wasn't in the infofox there so I assumed you were a vandal, Having gone through your contributions I can see you are in fact removing vandalism not introducing it so please accept my sincere apologies, I've removed the warning from your page too, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 15:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All good. But why did you revert the contributions? 108.2.126.127 (talk) 15:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because your edits to Busta Rhymes and Lil Wayne weren't at EN and those were the only 2 articles I had looked at, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you getting mad? I saw the revisions to more than just those 2 things by you. 108.2.126.127 (talk) 18:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not mad ? I explained why I reverted you in the very first reply and then you're asking "But why did you revert the contributions?" .... I don't know how else I'm supposed to reply to that ?, Anyway have a great day 108, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:42, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Sorry 108.2.126.127 (talk) 19:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Primos when I couldn't! 2601:402:4402:61F0:C1A2:D11B:B615:1F48 (talk) 22:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome 2601 :), Happy editing, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:56, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really a good edit summary for reverting edits? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you use this. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cactusisme, Thank you for reverting the vandalism it's greatly appreciated, Do you have diffs of me saying this because I don't recall ever saying this ? (I remember copypasting a previous editors edit summary about pov pushing),

To answer the question - "Vandalism (per Davey?)" should generally be avoided as it implies you don't actually know if it is vandalism or not, I always compare with the English Wikipedia - if the edit isn't there then I'll revert but sometimes you also need to check the page history at En in case the editor has sneakily added the same edit there too,

But yeah once is fine but I would avoid using that summary all the time, If you're not sure just don't revert, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 11:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010

 this--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch  07:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply] 

@Cactusisme That wasn't per anyone - That was an automatic edit summary provided by RW and if you look carefully you'll see it says "Vandalism (from contribs)" not "Vandalism (per contribs)" .... From and Per are two different things entirely...... –Davey2010^Talk 11:08, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also FYI I removed "from contribs" 6 days ago although you wouldn't have known that. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:11, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh alright Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 22:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I came here because I was expanding the Simple Wiki's Hailey's On It!, and when I was done, a Captcha came on, and I answered it. Later it said that it was denied. I went out and looked at the abuse filter log and the description was LTA 351. I don't know what that means, and I don't get why they wouldn't let me edit the page. Can you make the edit for me? Thanks-- 2601:402:4402:61F0:E2DA:D876:6031:1D80 (talk) 19:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @2601:402:4402:61F0:E2DA:D876:6031:1D80, LTA 351 is hidden so I unfortunately don't know what you did or said that resulted in your edit being prevented, You might want to consider creating an account as once you reach certain thresholds you won't keep being prevented from creating articles :), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll try the edit again now that I created an account! Amary🪷 ^{talk edit} 20:58, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Amaryllidinae You're welcome :), The world has changed since I first created this account so you probably have a thousand more hoops than I ever did,

I would suggesting reading en:Wikipedia:User access levels#Overview and then en:WP:AUTOCONFIRM as those are applicable to you, The more you edit and the more days you're generally on here the easier it becomes I think, You'll probably still encounter issues with an account but I would hope life would be more easier now than it was on an IP :), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A few minutes ago, a new user named "Annespankme" joined the Simple Wiki. The name is inappropriate, and since I'm not autoconfirmed yet on the Meta, I can't report. Can you? Magnolioideae (talk) 16:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll keep an eye but present they've not edited, I don't personally believe it's offensive enough for a block but you're more than welcome to report at WP:VIP, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't know why I'm asking, but by any chance do you know how to get Vandal Warner? I downloaded it, and it's not showing up in my toolbar. Magnolioideae (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This IP vandal keeps on deleting the Quick Deletion template I put on on of their articles because of vandalism. I don't want to get in an edit war. What exactly do I do, and how can I be able to get this article off of Simple Wiki? Maggie🌺 ^{talk edit} 00:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Magnolioideae, If the IP reverts then I would suggest going to an admins talkpage (Special:ListUsers/sysop) and asking one of those to delete it,

Regarding Vandal Warner - Unfortunately I've never installed it so wouldn't know sorry L(, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 00:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there I want to know how I can help out by creating a page without it getting deleted. 98.115.58.61 (talk) 02:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I'm not Davey2010, but you may want to see WP:How to write Simple English pages, WP:What Wikipedia is not, and WP:Citing sources as they are usually big on page deletions. I hope these help :) Maggie🌺 ^{talk edit} 04:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Because sometimes I see that pages get deleted if they have too little information 98.115.58.61 (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have fun editing ✧◝(⁰▿⁰)◜✧ Maggie🌺 ^{talk edit} 16:30, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know any code to any archive bots? I always self-archive my messages and is pretty exhausting. Maggie🌺 ^{talk edit} 17:30, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Magnolioideae, See en:Help:Archiving_a_talk_page#Automated_archiving - The examples below can be added to the top of your talkpage, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there Cluebot on the Simple Wikpedia? Maggie🌺 ^{talk edit} 18:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep –Davey2010^Talk 18:16, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*.✧ Maggie🌺 ^{talk edit} 18:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) There's no Cluebot, but there's Bot873, which does the same thing. VirusDontKill (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Does it use the MiszaBot text? Maggie🌺 ^{talk edit} 19:20, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. VirusDontKill (talk) 19:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you (✿^‿^) Maggie🌺 ^{talk edit} 19:24, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I updated information about Snoop Dogg which came from English Wikipedia and now the article is up to date. Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snoop_Dogg 98.115.58.61 (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @98.115.58.61, Fantastic thank you for updating the infobox, Excellent work!, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:36, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should the Simple English Wikipedia Infobox match the English Wikipedia infobox when it comes to occupation and genres for musicians? 159.14.184.11 (talk) 14:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also can a page be created here? Whenever people try creating pages on Wikipedia they get deleted 159.14.184.11 (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I edited the 'list of Wikipedias' article and copied extra information from the English Wikipedia's entry on that article about that topic while replacing some information on this Wikipedia edition's entry on that article with that one's, is to make this article's information more consistent with that one, while using simple Basic English. The first time I did that, @Kk.urban: reverted my edit the following day and told me that edit was too complex, so I made a similar edit six months later while simplifying certain sentences to the best of my abilities. Seeing how you also reverted my edits to that article four days and a half later, a few days ago, and told me the previous revision was simpler, why do you think that, and what do you think I can do to make the information I copy from the English Wikipedia's entry on that article simpler? PK2 (talk) 10:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sentences/paragraphs, images used, tables .... everything was imho over complicated and complex, that all being said I'm not exactly thrilled about List of Wikipedias#Wikipedia edition codes existing either however that's been there for over 10 years seemingly without issue,

I'll be honest I don't have any helpful advice other than "try to keep words simple and sentences short", Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 13:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there someone keeps adding that Tom Cruise is 5'9" when in reality he isn't 5'9" he's 5'7", I either keep removing it or changing it to 5'7" 159.14.184.11 (talk) 14:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've removed it as it's not pertinent, Height should only be used where it's relevant (ie if they're a model), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Can I use your template for counting redirect pages? 🪐 Haumeon the Adventurer 🪐 16:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Haumeon, Thanks for asking - I would ask that you didn't purely because there's various issues with it I've yet to fix, You can always use {{User active}} and {{User humility}}, The date that's listed there doesn't work either, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 17:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. Thanks. 🪐 Haumeon the Adventurer 🪐 17:13, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you wikify my article Akiva, into more simplified English?--Alon9393 (talk) 13:45, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Unfortunately I've tagged it for deletion as it doesn't meet our WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG guidelines, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 13:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Hassan Yazdani also has no notoriety and still exists--Alon9393 (talk) 14:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That person is notable, please see en:Hassan Yazdani, the article here just needs updating,

Also @Alon9393 in case you weren't aware the article won't be deleted for another 7 days yet so you're more than welcome to continue sourcing it and or heading to the RFD and stating why it should be kept, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you use scripts? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 12:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme what do you mean how do I use scripts ?, Do you mean how do you install them ?... –Davey2010^Talk 12:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010 Yeah Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 12:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well you've been installing them at your common.js page so not sure why you're asking me for....., Have a great day. –Davey2010^Talk 12:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But it does not seem to be working. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 12:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redlinked ones at User:Davey2010/script wont work because they've not been installed here, bluelinked ones work though, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 12:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cactusisme Sorry, I thought you had the scripts installed but have just seen you've added Ohconfucius instead which is why they don't work - I've updated User:Davey2010/script which now tells you how to install them, Sorry for removing your post I was confused as how you wanted them installed as assumed you already did have them installed but I see not so apologies for that,

Does the update page make sense ? if not I can edit it ?, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 13:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look later,tl thanks Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 22:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme okay no worries, if you have trouble understanding it or have trouble installing them please let me know, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 22:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I am at school right now so maybe like in 6 hours Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 23:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sure no worries, thanks –Davey2010^Talk 00:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It way better now. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 07:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme Brilliant thanks for the feedback :) and again i sincerely apologise for being rude to you and for deleting your post, Happy editing, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 11:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make helpful changes to Wikipedia. However, some of your changes, like those to "Talk:Main Page", did not seem to be helpful and have been reverted or removed. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Auntof6 (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 There is nothing "unhelpful" about my comment, I'm entitled to my comment as is anyone else on this project. Please don't abuse rollback either. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 21:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing List of SpongeBob SquarePants cast members. I withdrew the RfD and closed it. 2607:F140:6000:802A:543D:8FF4:E1DA:2530 (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @2607:F140:6000:802A:543D:8FF4:E1DA:2530, No worries, Thank you for nominating it for deletion which in turn made me spot the rather embarrassing error I made, Had it not been for you I wouldn't have been none the wiser so thank you for bringing it to my attention! :), Happy editing, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 22:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am added This notice "Wait" to speedy undelete it Ігнат Лостюк (talk) 16:20, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Noting for historical purposes I've replied at Talk:Agar.io as well as the users talkpage) –Davey2010^Talk 18:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It may be relevant that my draft User:Darkfrog24/Type locality (biology) is now the article Type (biology). Feel free to wreak your arts on it. Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I think I found that out eventually, You're more than welcome to QD it yourself but I have no issues with it sitting there, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 10:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for removing the short description templates. How many pages do you have left to go through? It's flooding the recent changes and I thought I'd give you the flood flag if you still have more left. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fehufanga, Oops sorry I had forgot about that - There's a time limit so although I'm done WPC is still sending the edits, I'd say there's anywhere between 30-60 articles left to save, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 13:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the remaining ones are fine to do without the flood flag then. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay no worries, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 13:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Davey2010, I need a secondary opinion about an issue. User:Gotitbro recently removed many categories from a number of articles, citing them as anachronistic in the edit summaries. Could you review these diffs and let me know if you find these categories problematic? I’d appreciate it. I don’t think User:Gotitbro wants to follow my advice and build consensus on the talk pages, and my continued reverts would only lead to edit warring. Here are the diffs: (Special:Diff/9750197, Special:Diff/9750186, Special:Diff/9750208, Special:Diff/9750209, Special:Diff/9750246, Special:Diff/9750250, Special:Diff/9750253, Special:Diff/9750257, Special:Diff/9750263, Special:Diff/9750276, Special:Diff/9750289 (Somehow Category:Monarchs of Afghanistan was left alone, but Pakistani monarchs was removed as "anachronistic"), Special:Diff/9750295, there are still lots more, as they spent a significant amount of time removing my contributions. – Cyber.Eyes.2005^Talk 14:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Simple Talk would have been a better avenue rather than the canvassing a single editor. I have continued this discussion there. Gotitbro (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cyber.Eyes.2005, Personally I would say no they're fine but maybe there's something here I'm missing or unaware of so agreeing with @Gotitbro it would be best to seek opinions on the Simple talkpage from people who know more about this subject than I do, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 15:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Gotitbro for going to the talkpage, most editors would have a slanging match here and not do much else so I certainly appreciate you going to the talkpage, getting the ball rolling and trying to find a resolution so thank you again for doing that, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 15:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Davey. I noticed that there are around a dozen or so templates in template space that start with your user name. You can see them at https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex?prefix=Davey2010&namespace=10.

I don't think we should have user-specific templates in the regular template space. If you still want these, could they be moved to your userspace? -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Auntof6, Many thanks for making me aware of these, Personally I don't see a problem with a few templates being in templatespace however I do agree as it stood it all looked messy (probably didn't need to create the doc pages tbh) but anyway I've moved them all over for now, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 12:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. -- Auntof6 (talk) 13:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Have a great day, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 13:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was wondering if my anger later in the Simple Talk thread "Anachronism" would ruin or spoil my track record and make administrators deny me userrights. Warm Regards, - 🪐●Haumeon 19:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Haumeon, I've said a lot worse and I still have userrights so you're fine! :), You're only judged on the relevent edits you make (so if you're applying for rollback you'll be judged on undo edits etc etc), You're entitled to your opinions and there's nothing wrong with a healthy debate now and again, You've not said anything bad in my book so you have nothing to worry about, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's comforting. Thanks! Have a great day!

Also, while we are talking about rollback, do you think my articles are good enough quality for patroller if I make enough of them? 🪐●Haumeon 19:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Haumeon I would say they're okay, Regarding Contact binary star thought; Remember we use Related pages here not See also, Also you need to remove Ivanova2013 from the reference section as this reference isn't used, Thanks and have a great day too, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Haumeon: Just keep in mind that Davey would not be the one making the call about this stuff, since he's not an admin. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I was just checking if I was going on the right path or not. 🪐●Haumeon 20:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I would say yes you are but yeah it's not down to me and admins may have different opinions, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. They might say I don't have enough experience (I'm only a month old) or that I'm not trusted enough. 🪐●Haumeon 20:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, Anyway happy editing, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Magniolioideae (just that I lost the password for it). Are non-admins able to close RFD requests when the week is up? Astera🪻 ^{talk edits} 15:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Asteradeae, only admins should close RfD requests, even in keep cases. There isn't much harm in closing RfDs say when an admin has forgot to close it after quick deletion, but determining the consensus on RfD should be up to administrators to deal with. The most recent discussion about this was at Wikipedia:Simple talk/Archive 150#Bring back WP:NAC. --Ferien (talk) 16:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien Okay. Thank you. Astera🪻 ^{talk edits} 16:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Asteradeae, Keeps/Deletes should always be closed by admins however regarding the closure of RFDs where the admin has forgotten; Truth be told I don't know, @Ferien says it's fine, Other admins say it isn't,

The exact same is applied with warning vandals, some admins block on sight, others expect you to go through the warning cycle for each vandal after a block,

There's so much conflicting information on here all thanks to... yeah I'll leave it there, Sorry I couldn't be of any more help, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 17:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010 It's fine, thanks for your help. @Ferien Thank you for your help. Astera🪻 ^{talk edits} 18:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You use redwarn too? Is there an error message saying "Cannot load rule database" for you? (This is Haumeon, I changed my name) ☀ SolarX☀ 19:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Haumeon, I do and nope no error messages here, You may of installed something correctly somewhere?, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I installed RedWarn through user scripts. ☀ SolarX☀ 19:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Haumeon Ah yeah you can't install Redwarn that way unfortunately, You would need to create all of the relevant pages here which isn't easy tbh, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok.

Also regarding what happened two weeks ago, I heard you were removing shortdesc from many pages, enough to make an admin want to give you a flood flag. How did you find all those pages? I checked on Wikiproject Check Wikipedia and found nothing regarding this. ☀ SolarX☀ 19:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, They're at Category:Pages with short description, They're not on WPC and tbh you don't need WPC to remove it - I only use it because if I open a ton of Chrome tabs at once it slows my laptop down whereas tons of WPC windows doesn't affect it much, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

People keep adding heights to people who aren't athletes or models 98.115.58.61 (talk) 17:16, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know I keep routinely removing these too, Unfortunately I'm not an admin so limited as to what I can do, If you're reverting the same person then report them to WP:VIP, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing it also 98.115.58.61 (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I've just gone and blocked an IP range that has done this to many articles, that should counter the problem, but there seem to be a few different IPs doing it. I've reverted the ones that were easy to rollback all of, going to try and have a look at the articles properly later tonight. --Ferien (talk) 17:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heights should be mentioned if the person is either an athlete or a model otherwise it shouldn't be mentioned 98.115.58.61 (talk) 17:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your help @Ferien it's always greatly appreciated :),

98 - You're correct - Of course height may be included if there's notability around their height (which in this case there isn't) but yeah If they're not a model or athlete then no - heights don't need to be used, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note, I nominated you for adminship. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 12:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cactusisme, I wished you had asked me first because I have no desire to be an admin, I much prefer being a normal editor, Thanks though I appreciate the kind gesture, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davey, I looked at the IP range that would cover the IPs who've kept making the disruptive edits on Bus, Truck etc. The smallest range to contain all the IP addresses appears to be a /38 range which is too wide for a IPv6 block. If the issue gets worse, please feel free to request semi-protection for the pages in question. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 16:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ferien, Ah okay no worries, Yeah I certainly wouldn't want random people being caught up in the block, I just spotted the similarities at the last minute so chucked it in there just in case lol, Thanks for your message, Take care, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 16:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not that it's necessarily my business, but I noticed in dealing with the QD request on your userpage: the top template on RfDs is just {{archive top}} substituted, with the corresponding {{archive bottom}}, if that's helpful at all :) --Ferien (talk) 22:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ferien, Oh ..... okay thank you for letting me know lol, Because it uses the "did/did not succeed" category I just assumed it was some sort of template or script that did this, Never once thought it was the atop/abot templates so thank you so much!,

Alls I need to do now is buy a keyboard with the | symbol and then I can finally get rid of the box altogether :), Thanks again for letting know about the rfd template much appreciated :), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) The category comes from the deleted/kept templates, btw --Ferien (talk) 06:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ooo never knew that either :O, Thanks for letting me know that's very kind of you :), Also @Ferien could I be a pain and ask that User talk:Davey2010/Discography be moved back to User talk:Davey2010/DiscographyCodes please? (the redirect can be deleted),

Thanks again for the insightful knowledge :), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, happy to help :) --Ferien (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien You my friend are amazing thank you again :), Take care, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 17:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]