User talk:AJRobbins

Hello everybody! Welcome to my talk page!

Hello AJRobbins! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ed ¿Cómo estás? 18:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Building consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello. Please see my recent edits to Carleman matrix and Bell polynomials. Under Wikipedia:Manual of Style, you shouldn't capitalize the initial letter of a word merely because it's in a section heading. Thus See also, not See Also.

Also, it's usually a good idea to tell the non-mathematician reader at the beginning that mathematics is what the article is about. Otherwise in some cases they think it's just incomrehensible symbols that someone put there as graffiti. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm trying my best, but I'm still learning how to Wiki... AJRobbins (talk) 00:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't exactly sure what you meant by your recent addition to Talk:Tetration, but I thought I would explain how to create a new page.

• Type the name of the page you wish to create into the search box on the left sidebar.

The page you arrive at will have the text "You searched for ____" in small light-gray type.

• Note that the article name you typed in is a red link (meaning no such article exists yet). Click on the red link, and it will send you to a page where you can type the text of the new article.

Please post on my talk page if you have any questions or if this isn't clear enough. I've been with Wikipedia for a while now, and I am willing to help if I can, but I'm definitely not an expert. --Whiteknox (talk) 04:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I know how to make a page now. I made the super-logarithm page. Let me know what you think. AJRobbins (talk) 06:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cant hyper-operator be defined such a way: hyper (a,n,b/c) = hroot_n(hyper (a,n,b),c) ?--Dojarca (talk) 10:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, not with the standard hyper-operators. I think that anything that includes (n=1 as addition, n=2 as multiplication) can be called a "hyper-operator" of sorts. But for the standard hyper-operators, n=4 gives tetration, which would have to satisfy that equation, but it doesn't. Plugging in n=4 and b=1 gives ${\displaystyle \,{}^{(1/c)}a={\text{srt}}_{c}({}^{1}a)={\text{srt}}_{c}(a)}$ which boils down the the assumption that reciprocal hyper-exponents will always give hyper-roots, which is false. The reason why it is false is because there is a well-known counter-example. The counter-example is ${\displaystyle \,{\text{srt}}_{\infty }(a)=a^{1/a}}$ which means if the formula were to hold, ${\displaystyle \,{}^{(1/{\infty })}a={}^{0}{a}=1\neq a^{1/a}={\text{srt}}_{\infty }(a)}$ then we would get a contraction. Thus it is false. AJRobbins (talk) 21:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, As per your comment at the talk page on 3 jan '08, there has hopefully been progress. Katzmik (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hyperoperation (group theory). Since you had some involvement with the Hyperoperation (group theory) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I know nothing about group theory, so I don't know if the "Hyperstructure" page is even worth keeping, but I would tend to agree with keeping disambiguation pages when there is any possibility of confusion. AJRobbins (talk) 18:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Hi Andrew, I greatly enjoyed your work on tetration, and I also would like to ask you a question, but I have not been able to figure out how to send you a private message. Thankyou bugman136 Bugman136 (talk) 21:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! AJRobbins (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I moved your file to the commons to be able to use it in the hungarian and other wikipedias too.

Thanks! - AJRobbins (talk) 03:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TetrationInf.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. - AJRobbins (talk) 03:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article External (mathematics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Novel mathematical notion

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article External (mathematics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/External (mathematics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XOR'easter (talk) 20:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]