User talk:Cullen328

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 101, 102, 103

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

If you have any interest in editing Wikipedia by smartphone, I encourage you to read my essay, Smartphone editing. Thank you.

Welcome to my talk page I use the name Cullen328 on Wikipedia, but you can call me "Jim" because that's my real first name. If you want to start a new conversation, please click "New section" or "Add topic" at the top of this page. I keep the old comments from July and August of 2009 that follow the "Contents" here, because these friendly words of greeting made me feel welcome when I first started editing Wikipedia.

Hello and welcome to my talk page. If you want to start a new conversation, please click "New section" at the top of this page. I keep the comments that follow from July and August of 2009 readily visible, because these friendly words of greeting made me feel welcome here on Wikipedia when I first started editing. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:38, 6 November 2011 (UTC

I would appreciate comments and suggestions on any contributions I make. I am learning.Cullen328 (talk) 03:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on Jules Eichorn. He's been needing an article for a while.   Will Beback  talk  06:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I may suggest, now that you've posted the Eichorn article the draft below might be deleted. It's your talk page to do with as you like, but it's a bit hard to edit around.

As for formatting and pictures, a good way to learn is to look around at other articles to see what you think looks best. It can be helpful to break up long blocks of text into subsections. Perhaps it'd be possible to split the biography into two or three eras. Other than that, the formatting is usually kept fairly plain. As for photos, it's easy to upload them: the trick is in finding photos with appropriate licensing. If you have any personal photos then those'd be fine. There are might be pictures of the peaks he did first ascents on in the Wikicommons. File:Cathedral Peak.png is a so-so pic of Eichorn Pinnacle.

As before, feel free to ask if you have any questions. There are several editors here who are mountaineers or just admirers of the Sierra, so you're in good company.   Will Beback  talk  21:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Many editors create "sandbox" pages for drafting articles. For example, User talk:Cullen328/Sandbox.   Will Beback  talk  00:17, 1 August 2009

Hey Jim, just wanted to say welcome and thanks for your contributions to the Sierra Nevada climbing history articles. You're filling a niche that's been missing here, I look forward to working with you. --Justin (talk) 11:54, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second that. Nice work on Allen Steck and welcome to Wikipedia. I don't know who you are planning to write up next but if your taking requests I think Peter Croft (climber) could really use a page. If you ever have any questions please ask. Thanks again for your great additions.--OMCV (talk) 02:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Justin and OMCV. I am beginning work on Tom Frost and Glen Dawson. Comments on Norman Clyde would be welcomed. I will defintely read up on Peter Croft, OMCV. I am still "learning the ropes" in Wikipedia, to use a climbing analogy, and have all sorts of things in mind. My biggest challenge right now is getting permission to use images. My next biggest challenge is hiking to the top of Mt. Whitney with my wife in ten days - she's never been above 12,000 feet except for the train ride up Pikes Peak. As she's 56 and developing arthritis in her toes, it will be an accomplishment if she (and I) complete the Class 1 feat. Jim Heaphy (talk) 02:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Debra and I made it to the summit of Mt. Whitney at 2:20 PM on Friday, September 11. Jim Heaphy (talk) 00:59, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic Archive 1Automatic Archive 2Automatic Archive 3

Happy New Year 2021 I hope your New Year holiday is enjoyable and the coming year is much better than the one we are leaving behind. Best wishes from Los Angeles.   // Timothy :: talk

hello jim, hope you are doing well. i am a beginner on wikipedia but i am auto correction user. i want to write an article on a ngo which is working very good in there respective field. a friend of mine wrote a article on that topic but it got deleted due to less third party source. can you suggest me something how to write an article which won't get deleted, also i have some credible third party source so i want to ask how can i mention them because they are external links. Devanshusharma569 (talk)devanshusharma569

Happy St. Patrick's Day! I hope your St. Patrick's Day is enjoyable and safe. Hopefully next year there will be more festive celebrations. Best wishes from Los Angeles.   // Timothy :: talk

(Personal attack removed)

Hi Jim,

I am very new to Wikipedia. I got your feedback on the draft article located under PhoCoHaNoi. Thanks so much for your comments. I would greatly appreciate if you would spare some valuable time to highlight those parts from the draft that I need to pay close attentions to regarding the aspect that you raised. I know it would be a long shot to ask if you would even consider providing specific examples by directly editing them on the draft.

Lastly, I still do not know on how to submit the revision for review. I do not see any obvious buttons or pull-down menus from the Sandbox setting that would be able to allow to submit the article for review.

Thank you so much.

PhoCoHaNoi

Hello, PhoCoHaNoi. I am not going to edit the draft myself, because I want this to be a learning exercise for you. Here are a few examples of unacceptable wording:

• "celebrating the 73-year history of outstanding men and women"

• "pioneering contributions"

• "sustained leadership and strategic vision"

• "Exceptional services to innovation ecosystem"

• "stimulating small business innovation, meeting the Air Force and DoD R&D needs, broadening participation in innovation and entrepreneurship, and boosting commercialization"

• " So, as Dr. Pham looked back now, he brought systems-theoretic science and control engineering principles, together with teamwork and interdisciplinary to bear fruition in solving warfighter engineering problems, various areas of specific focus for increased activities in space control autonomy and space domain awareness."

It is not the job of a Wikipedia editor (you) to praise a person. Every trace of this non-neutral language must be removed. A Wikipedia article should never say "Person A is great!" Instead, it should say "Reliable source C reports that Expert B says that Person A is great", along with a reference to Reliable source C.

As for how to submit your draft, I will explain that when the draft complies with the neutral point of view. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it

Hi Jim. I will deeply appreciate anything that you can do to help. How can I find out about other editors and send them messages? I recently looked for an article about The Italian Coffee Company that I had read years ago. However, I could not find it. I believe that this article should be available. I am a new editor and I have a big learning curve ahead of me. Maybe you can post to my talk page. I am user Mojosa17. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Hi!

Wikimania is happening and hopefully you're enjoying the sessions. While it's fairly last minute, you're warmly invited to participate in the local Wikimania-themed meetup in the Wikimedia Foundation office this Friday (tomorrow!). You will have to register in advance, but we would love to see more people from the WikiSalon community participate! For more information and registration, please check out meta:Wikimania 2022/San Francisco Meetup.

The event will involve hacking, teaching, learning, and celebrating and we'll have snacks. We will have the opportunity to watch live sessions at Wikimania together in the afternoon. The rest of the day we'll have opportunity to participate in the hackathon, and we may have some on-demand workshops/learning sessions.

In case we run out of space, it's first-come-first-serve so let us know soon! Hope to see you there.

(Subscribe/Unsubscribe to this talk page notice here)

On behalf of the Bay Area Wiki Salon team and Bittakea, Effeietsanders

You have been Notified because you were once involved in a similar discussion involving Founding Fathers.
There is a debate over whether to keep Category: Homes of United States Founding Fathers as a category. More opinions are needed. The discussion is located Here -- Gwillhickers (talk)

story · music · places

Thank you for thinking of me! - Recommended reading today: Frye Fire, by sadly missed Vami_IV. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Gerda Arendt. Wishing you the best. Cullen328 (talk) 23:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm happy because my story today is about a Czech mezzo soprano who is mentioned on the Main page on her birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk)

Three stories related to today in memory, 11 September, 20 July and 20 June, the latter piece of art also pictured on the Main page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today is Schoenberg's 150th birthday! On display, portrayed by Egon Schiele, with a DYK hook from 2010 and another from 2014, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday. - See places for a stunning sunrise, on the day Bruckner's 200th birthday was celebrated (a few days late). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for saying nice things about the interestingness of my topics in an RfA, however I firstly believe that the view on "interesting or boring" is absolutely not related to anything factual, plain POV, secondly this POV - for me at least - has nothing to do with the ability for administration, thirdly: that my topics are boring is the general common POV of the current DYK team, has been for 5 years by now, and if you want to do something for me chime in there, not in an RfC. The last case was Maryvonne Le Dizès, a name you will have heard, where after weeks of arguing we arrived at a variant of the original hook. Waste of time, every time, and the next DYK is not in sight because I don't like to waste my time. For an overlooked great woman, however, I endure it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gerda Arendt, I have no idea why you would assume that I would be familiar with Maryvonne Le Dizès, a name that I had never heard even once until you posted here. I will readily assume that she is an outstanding performer in your preferred genres. But I have told you several times previously that I have been a fan of rock and roll music broadly defined, and related broad genres like soul, blues, jazz, punk and new wave, ever since I was a child nearly 70 years ago. I have a rudimentary familiarity and respect for classical music and opera, am capable of enjoying that style of music when there is no other choice, have no negative feelings about people who love classical music, and accept it as as great artistry. But I have been and will remain a rock and roll fan forever. I certainly would not expect you to be familiar with someone rated #403 on a list of the 500 best rock guitarists in history that I may have been listening to since my teenage years.

As to the main point, I will never accept some editor insulting you so rudely, just as I would hope that you you would object to to another editor insulting me. Despite our musical differences, I have the deepest respect for your expertise and your contributions. And your kindness towards others which is remarkable and exemplary.

As for DYK in particular and the main page in general, I find 99.9% of the Sturm und Drang there to be a total waste of time. Main page content is evanescent and comparable to the newsprint used to line canary cages, in my opinion. All that I care about is enduring and informative encyclopedia articles, including those about the music that you love and the music that I love. Cullen328 (talk) 09:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining, Jim. - I expected you to have heard of the name simply because you took part in a lengthy thread on my talk that was also about her. Sorry if I was wrong. I'm going to archive that discussion with the new month although some questions remain open.

"boring" is no insult in my book, and I think I explained that. - "blatant canvassing" for what I thought was pleading for help to meet a deadline felt more like an insult.

I like to tell my stories, and many more look at them on the Main page than in my user space ;) - For the violinist, it was 15k+ per ITN, and we'll see for DYK on 3 October, - 1.5k I assume. Pinging AirshipJungleman29 as I should have done in the last post. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gerda although I'm not really sure what you need me here for. One thing I was thinking (I hope Cullen328 doesn't mind), next time please ping me to return to an FAC like this one—I quite liked the article and thought I could probably support after a few more tweaks, but I got distracted, sorry. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want you to do anything here, just not talk about you behind your back. I would have pinged you to the FAC if I wanted to continue but I changed my mind about the sequence of FACs, and will alert you to the (different) next. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it, on both counts. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you posted at BLPN recently, so hopefully you can help me understand a concept...

Say we have a claim that is made about a well-known living person in a non-BLP article. The claim is about their career specifically, and may be more about a decision an entity (or third-party) made involving them, but they are mentioned in the claim and in the article.

The sole basis for the claim relies on an EXPERTSPS that is generally considered reliable. Does that automatically disqualify inclusion on Wikipedia per WP:BLPSPS? Before you answer, here are a few things that muddy the waters:

• There are several medium-quality secondary sources that have picked up on this EXPERTSPS report and regurgitated it, providing some brief analysis. However, they all refer to the claim with attribution and caution, using phrases like "reportedly", "according to", and "may have". In other words, these secondary sources did not independently verify the claim.
• There are only a handful of medium-quality sources that did this, but within this industry, you would have expected a lot more, especially if this news was significant.
• The claim itself is fairly mild and trivial, and it does not really impact the living person's reputation; not something you would necessarily deem positive or negative.

Is this a BLPSPS violation or even a BLP concern? Sorry, I'm just not well-versed in this area. Thanks in advance! --GoneIn60 (talk) 02:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GoneIn60. This appears to be a borderline area the way you are describing it, and the best decision probably depends on the specific context. Which article are you talking about? Always keep in mind that WP:BLP says Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. That is mandatory. Cullen328 (talk) 03:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there is an active discussion going on right now in the form of a straw poll (which I'm sure you would quickly spot from my editing history), but it just kind of dawned on me that BLP might apply here. Wanted to be sure before I brought it up. I haven't weighed in with a !vote and was actually acting more like a moderator, trying to keep the peace and seeing it through to completion. Things had gotten a bit contentious earlier. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 03:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be frank, it strikes me as trivial gossip. If I was interested in the topic, I would oppose inclusion. I think that it is bordeline regarding BLP policy. I'm just astonished that someone thought it was a good idea to list 15 actors as "stars" in the lead section. I saw the original film during its first run at the Coronet Theater in San Francisco in 1977, and remain amazed that Hollywood is still trying to squeeze money out of this franchise 47 years later. Cullen328 (talk) 04:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging GoneIn60. Cullen328 (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was my initial reaction as well, trivial. I suspect a widely-published discussion would draw the same conclusion.

The problem these days is that any localized discussion within the TV and film realms is likely to run into what I call these segregated think tanks (for lack of a better term), formed by large groups of editors that primarily live here. Each one specializes in a topic of interest, such as the MCU, and if you dip a toe into their pond, they are going to notice! They do great work, of course, but occasionally helpful changes and suggestions are weeded out prematurely by the swarm. That's not how things have been always been done. Change doesn't come easy in these parts, and you wind up with nonsensical leads with 15 actor names (because we're following an old rule that needs updating) or inserting trivial details (because our MoS says so).

Anyway, rant over! I appreciate you taking the time to review. Thanks for the feedback! --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GoneIn60, unless major policy violations are going on, I tend to stay away from fan-dominated pop culture topic areas. I was pretty much done with comic book inspired films by the release of the 1978 Superman film. Call me narrow minded and judgmental, but I consider this type of thing to be the realm of children and adolescents, and I am bemused by full grown adults who remain really big fans of this stuff until old age. Cullen328 (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, that's fair! It used to be less-accepted back in the day, but now you're not so hip if you're not donning a Captain America T-Shirt. Personally, I never cared much for comics, superheroes, and the like when I was growing up (Gen X here), but I always loved cinema. You're wise to keep your distance from the kids, but my passion for film keeps me close to the action...unfortunately closer than I'd prefer to be. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 06:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		Your nitpicking got into my head. Ha! GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 21:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GustavoCza, my goal is clarity. Cullen328 (talk) 21:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I hope I am not doing something utterly wrong by approaching you. An editor in a very politically charged talk page discussion I observed today was arguably WP:CASTINGASPERSIONS fairly intensely.[1] I then noticed that the account had basically only ever edited post-1992 politics talk page discussions.[2] One of their first such threads was called "This is fascism".[3] Isn't all that actionable per WP:NOTHERE? Biohistorian15 (talk) 18:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just post it to AN/I. You may ignore the info.Biohistorian15 (talk) 10:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sympathise with you question. "in need of new hobbies" does seem odd. (When I started on a Ph.D., I already had hobbies; and I continued to pursue them, doing less work than I should. A foolish decision, to be sure. But going out of my way to look for distractions would have been even more foolish.) Maproom (talk) 21:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know you are a busy man, but would you be so kind to help my new friend Feeglgeef? They could be a good new vandalfighter but they respond badly to criticism and they need more guidance. We butted heads a bit so they are unlikely to listen to my advice. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 07:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Polygnotus. I have taken a quick look and saw your argument with Feeglgeef. I followed up on an IP they reverted who was spamming a dentistry website into a number of dental articles. I reverted some of that spam and blocked the IP for a week. Anyway, I need to get some sleep and then tomorrow, I will have a medical procedure not on my teeth (I had a dental crown installed a couple of weeks ago) but rather laser surgery on my "good" eye. I hope things go smoothly but my vision may be adversely affected for a while. Continue monitoring please. Cullen328 (talk) 08:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, then please ignore me, your todolist is far far more important; and I can ask someone else. I am in no hurry. Thanks for blocking that IP, hopefully that IP finds a new hobby, and sleep well and good luck! Polygnotus (talk) 08:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated to my own teahouse question, recommend blocking this disruptive IP that's been active in the section immediately below mine. The Kip ^(contribs) 22:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Kip, I have extended their block to one week and revoked their talk page access. Cullen328 (talk) 22:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't spot that WMF had already made a comment at the article t/p (my bad; by the ANI case, I meant this) and thought it to be a new development because it popped up on my X feed! Apologies, TrangaBellam (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No apology needed, TrangaBellam. Cullen328 (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hope your well

I would like to create a new page for group reciters just wanted to know how can i create a new page. --Bukhari110 (talk) 20:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bukhari110. Are you familiar with the Wikipedia article Qira'at?

It is very difficult for a brand new editor to create an acceptable new article. I recommend that you spend several weeks at least learning about Wikipedia's Policies and guidelines, and improving existing articles. During that time, study Your first article. Gather your references to reliable sources before you begin writing prose. Wikipedia:Writing Wikipedia articles backward has great advice. Cullen328 (talk) 21:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cullen328. I'm very sorry to bother you here with this case again. As I have pinged you on Commons, I imagine you are aware that de Quintal has been harassing me across various projects, including this English Wikipedia, the Portuguese Wikipedia, and Commons as well, as mentioned before. Now that he is blocked here, he has shown up on the Spanish Wikipedia, where I rarely edit, inviting me to a WhatsApp group (?!?!?!) that apparently also includes a long-term abuser named "Quintinense" (who has previously harassed and legally threatened me on Wikidata). I would like to know if it's a case for a permanent block here or if I should pursue the global lock of de Quintal. Thank you, RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RodRabelo7. I am an adminstrator only on the English Wikipedia. Though I speak a few words of Spanish haltingly, I am nowhere near fluent, and I speak no Portuguese. I upload images occasionally to Wikimedia Commons but am not really familiar with their administrative procedures though I have made a handful of comments there. This is what I can promise you. If the editor in question engages in further disruptive editing here on English Wikipedia, and I learn about it before another administrator (I could be asleep or doing something fun or useful off Wikipedia), I will block the editor again, and the block will be much longer or indefinite. As for a global lock, please read this Meta page. I know very little about it. In fairness to Fox de Quintal, I am pinging them so that they know what I am saying about them. Cullen328 (talk) 02:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could I bother you with something so I don't need to open an SPI on it?

Last month you blocked Hangama1, whose only edit was to a film promo, Draft:Hangama Dot Com, in which they clearly have a COI based on the user name.

That draft was abandoned, but new user Rickmood duplicated it into Draft:Hangama Dot Com 2. This account was registered after Hangama1 was blocked, and is an SPA with interest in only this topic, which seems ducky to me. (I did ask them about this at the AfC HD, but they conveniently didn't hear me.)

If you don't think they're the same, let me know. Or if you don't feel comfortable blocking on such circumstantial evidence, I can take this to SPI, just didn't want to go there automatically as it's backlogged.

Thanks either way, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DoubleGrazing. Although the drafts are not identical, vast swathes are the same, word for word. I have indefinitely blocked Rickmood as a sockpuppet. Thanks for noticing. Cullen328 (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i want to edit content about: CFO | Investor | Financial Advisor | Tax & Business Consultant | Networker | Entrepreneur. --Prateektosniwal (talk) 06:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked this account. Cullen328 (talk) 17:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Screw-your-political-censorship (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is an obvious sockpuppet of Nothing-nothing-at-all (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who I now see is a sockpuppet of Agoraagoras (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). DuncanHill (talk) 10:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, DuncanHill. You are correct and I have noted that in the block log. Cullen328 (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caracas-squirrel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is another. DuncanHill (talk) 22:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, DuncanHill. I blocked the latest sock and semi-protected the three target articles for three weeks. If it starts up again, I will protect for longer. Cullen328 (talk) 01:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 09:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julian Assange on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim. Would you mind taking a look at Maicon Nogueira? I'm not seeing anything that might establish Nogueria's Wikipedia notablity per WP:NPOLITICIAN or WP:BIO, and I think the page might've been created because the subject is currently running for local office. I thought of draftifying the article, but just want a second opinion just in case I'm missing something. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marchjuly. I think that it is likely that the mayor of a city of about 900,000 is notable, but serving as the Municipal Secretary of Youth of Campo Grande is not a plausible claim of notability. Consider this unreferenced and non-neutral gem from that article: The work of SEJUV is of great importance to the local community, as it provides young people with opportunities for training and development, preparing them for the job market and encouraging entrepreneurship. In addition, the department plays a vital role in the formation of conscious and active citizens in society. I do not read Portuguese and don't claim expertise in Brazilian politics. The article looks like a campaign brochure masquerading as an encyclopedia article to me, and I do not need Google Translate to know what candidato a Vereador de Campo Grande, MS means in the headline of the first reference. Whether draftification or AfD is the best option, I will leave up to you. Cullen328 (talk) 05:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jim for taking a look. I drafity the article and post a message about it on the creator's user talk page suggesting that they continue working on it and submit it via WP:AFC when they think it's ready for review. If they move it back, I'll bring it to AFD. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I draftify articles created by Autopatrolled editors? The BLP article has no sources cited. I added the BLP Unsourced tag, but after one hour, no sources have been added. GrabUp - Talk 17:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftified :) GrabUp - Talk 17:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nashville International Airport on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect sockpuppetry for block evasion: compare edits: 50.48.239.234 and Steven1991 in Antisemitic trope. --Altenmann >talk 05:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i need help about how to join en wikipedia as another group.

Putu Suhartawan (talk) 14:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Putu Suhartawan. I do not know what you mean by "another group". Cullen328 (talk) 16:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i mean like rights system status. like this :

Log

Date

Rights

Performer

Summary

Account usernames currently in use on Wikipedia, or (if filtered) only those who are a member of a specified group.

• Cullen328 talk contribs‏‎ (autopatrolled, administrator) (Created on 29 June 2009 at 07:22)

Putu Suhartawan (talk) 19:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Putu Suhartawan, which specific group are you interested in? Each has different qualifications. See Wikipedia:Autopatrolled for example. Cullen328 (talk) 19:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to try from beginner like autopatrolled group , to easy for know how difficul is the way for next level group soon. But i think my post in en wikipedia just not good yet. How i can be elected soon for the easy way is? Putu Suhartawan (talk) 20:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Putu Suhartawan, the autopatrolled user right requires a significant and consistent record of creating new policy compliant articles about notable topics. Cullen328 (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JunebugGD User page states...'Yes, I have vandalized on an old account, but that was years ago now. I know better. I'm not a vandal anymore.' Then a sandbox entry, User:JunebugGD/sandbox. Not sure if it's worth bothering about? Knitsey (talk) 19:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

shut up. JunebugGD (talk) 19:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that might be an answer lol. Knitsey (talk) 19:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why did you post this anyways? JunebugGD (talk) 19:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.Cullen328,can you see this Request. Happy editing --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 06:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bhairava7, I have no idea what you are asking me to do. Read it or act on it? Cullen328 (talk) 06:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying, I thought you need to act or approve my request, if you comfortable. Happy editing --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 06:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bhairava7, I am not in the business of acting on or approving your edits or proposed edits. Your edits stand or fall on their own merits. Cullen328 (talk) 06:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen, I don't think you understood the user's AN request. I've taken care of it.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I may adopt that approach when I see 'multidsciplinary' used next 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		I think this may be the Multidisciplinary Barnstar 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timtrent, you know of course that my contributions, even my occasional sarcastic ones, can be reused by anyone at any time for any purpose, and I release you from the requirement to attribute. I am glad that you enjoyed my late night wordplay. and wish you well. Cullen328 (talk) 09:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I've ever seen you being sarcastic. Not even caustic. 😈😇🤡 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

CheckUser changes

• Barkeep49
• Izno

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

---

Hi Jim, I'm relatively new in the Wikipedia page creation process as I've only read the guidelines recently and never posted before. I tried posting an about page for an Action Network (acquired by Better Collective as of 2021) sports content writer and it was declined. Moving on from that point I've read up on all of the rules, and I plan on removing all the even remotely promotional language and adding more secondary sources. Is there a way I could get this to you before actually submitting again so I can get some feedback on where I might be going wrong about it? 212.200.231.38 (talk) 16:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This the only edit from this IP address, so I cannot take a look at your previous effort unless you give me the precise name of the draft. I suggest creating an account so that your contributions can be reviewed. You should then create a new draft with that account, which I will be happy to take a look at. Cullen328 (talk) 18:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

You may remember Maryvonne Le Dizès, my story today as on 28 August. Some September music was unusual: last compositions and eternal light, with Ligeti mentioned in story and music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, you asked "when will that misconduct stop?" I'd like to say right now, and I might need your help in recognizing when I transgress, if you think I can be rehabilitated (after littering and all that). If you're in the SF Bay Area, maybe we can meet at the Group W bench or some place, and get to see each other as good-hearted and well-intentioned but minorly flawed old-fogey contributors with orthogonal viewpoints, instead of warring parties and diametric opposites. Feel free to email me or whatever. Dicklyon (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dicklyon, although I lived in the greater Bay Area for almost 50 years, I now live in Grass Valley which is a 2-1/2 hour drive away when traffic is flowing smoothly. Also, my wife is in poor health and needs my assistance. So, I am unable to make that kind of trip at this time. I do not consider us "warring parties" and simply want you to carefully avoid unnecessary disputes over what I and many other editors consider to be trivialities. Cullen328 (talk) 19:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been to Grass Valley since 1993. Is it still the same? I ask because I heard a lot of the fires have reduced the number of trees, which I'm sure is also true for development. When I visited friends in the 1990s, there was one old-timey bar (where we drank beer) and millions of trees, with houses interspersed in the forest. It was quite a magical place back then. Viriditas (talk) 19:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viriditas, although there have been many fires in the region, none have directly affected the twin communities of Grass Valley and Nevada City. It has been severe winter snowstorms not fires that have knocked down thousands of trees, but 99% of the trees are thriving. If anything, the community is better than back then. The historic Gold Rush downtown of Grass Valley has been renovated with Mill Street converted to a beautifully landscaped pedestrian mall. It is a great community for semi-retired folks like me. And we still have quite a few old-timey bars and restaurants. Cullen328 (talk) 20:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to hear. How about wildlife? Do you see the insects, birds, and animal population doing well? Viriditas (talk) 20:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viriditas, yes, I frequently see deer as well, and little lizards too. A herd of dozens of goats was feeding in a meadow one street over this summer. Rent-a-Goat is a viable business, it seems. My granddaughter raises chickens and something ate two of them a couple of months ago so her parents bought her four baby chicks which are thriving. The offender could have been a mountain lion because one had been spotted the previous day less than half a mile away. Cullen328 (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We're trying to get the rent-a-goat thing formalized here on Maui to prevent wildfires. It hasn't happened yet. BTW, if you want some chickens, we've got hundreds of thousands of feral chickens ready to be shipped off to Grass Valley! That's a whole other story you will have to remind me to tell you about. Basically, one person raised chickens in their yard, they escaped, and their descendants have now taken over the entire island. I've heard the mountain lion population in California is rebounding. I remember when they would roam Santa Cruz and would sometimes visit Palo Alto and hide in the trees, waiting to pounce. I was chased by a mother guarding her cubs on the campus of UCSC one fine afternoon in 1992, but the wind was blowing in the opposite direction and she lost my scent. Imagine my total surprise when, in 2020, during the beginning of the pandemic, I'm sitting back relaxing on the couch watching Alex Garland's Devs, when I jump up and start screaming, "That's the place!" It turns out Garland filmed the scenes for the quantum computing company exactly where I was chased by the big cat. That was fun to see. Viriditas (talk) 20:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I thought all the feral chickens on Maui had been killed off and the only island where there's a large population of them is Kauai. At least that was my impression when I visited both islands. On my last visit to Kauai I asked a local if it's OK to kill and eat the chickens. The answer was "sure, but why would anybody go to all the trouble to kill, pluck, bleed, and cook it when you can take $5 down to Costo cand get a better-quality chicken already prepared and cooked to perfection?"

I've visite the Big Island several times and the other islands at least twice. I love the Big Island because you have all the ecosystems and climates that exist on the planet in one place! Coastal, desert, mountain, forest, jungle, plains, rainforest, heat, snow, etc.

@Dicklyon: we've had disagreements in the past also, but so long ago I can't really remember what they were about. Probably my username was Amatulic back then. I'm in the Bay Area too, living in Mountain View. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronist, you sweet summer child! Starting around 2008 or so, the feral chickens took over Maui. You're right, that prior to 2008, feral chickens were rarely seen, let alone heard going qui qui ri qui except for the island of Kauai. Since that time, Maui has been overrun by feral chickens, and as much as they are a nuisance, they are quite beautiful to behold, particularly their colorful plumage. The saddest part is the pain and suffering many of them experience, particularly when they are run over by cars or can't get access to fresh water in the heat. It's unfortunate, but some people breed them for cockfighting, which is how this likely started. Viriditas (talk) 21:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viriditas, my wife and I and my other son took a one week cruise around Hawaii on the Pride of America eleven years ago. We saw plenty of chickens on Maui and had a splendid time. We used to live in American Canyon, California, where the oldest of the two 7-Elevens in town was known for chickens roaming the parking lot. Cullen328 (talk) 20:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What did you think of the restaurant quality on the Pride of America? I heard good things from people about it. Did you find the sailing between the islands smooth or choppy? It sounds like you visited Hilo on the Big Island. Did you take a volcano tour? Viriditas (talk) 20:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viriditas, we thought the main dining rooms were very good, better than we expected. We had quick breakfasts at the buffet. I like omelets made to order. We did not try the upscale restaurants because we were already spending money like drunken sailors. We did not have any choppy weather. We had booked an excursion to Volcanoes National Park, but sadly the 2013 United States federal government shutdown began just as our cruise was starting. The excursion went to various volcano related state parks instead, which were fascinating, but still. So it goes. Cullen328 (talk) 21:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I used to eat eggs, I was a huge fan of the Florentine-style omelette, which I believe was introduced to me by a Middle Eastern chef; I can't remember if they were from Jordan, Lebanon, or somewhere else, it's been too long. I feel silly that I never learned to use Tabasco or sriracha on eggs until I was in my 30s. Weird. Viriditas (talk) 21:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viriditas, "Did you know . . ." that I am the primary author of Florentine (culinary term)? Cullen328 (talk) 21:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. What are the odds?? Viriditas (talk) 21:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was through there a few weeks ago on the way back from Tahoe, with lunch in Nevada City and a cruise by the Nevada County Airport to see the Blancolirio World Headquarters, or its neighborhood at least. Nice area. Maybe we can meet for coffee or a beer if I get through there again. Dicklyon (talk) 21:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dicklyon, that would be fine. I would be willing to meet you in Auburn, California on Interstate 80. Cullen328 (talk) 21:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is that famous Burger King that honors Jim Otto still around in Auburn? If it is, we should add it to Otto's article. I think I gave up playing football after visiting that BK. Back in the day, it had a display highlighting all of his football-related injuries. Wild stuff. Viriditas (talk) 22:08, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viriditas, here is an article about Otto that mentions his Burger King restaurant and the memorabilia there. Currently, there is only one Burger King in the Auburn area, in the suburbanized strip mall community of North Auburn, California, which has a bigger population than the old gold mining town of Auburn. It is right on my main access route to Interstate 80 so I have driven by there hundreds of times. I don't remember being inside, but by coincidence, it is in the same shopping center as my dentist's office and I am seeing him next Wednesday. I will check it out. Cullen328 (talk) 03:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Now that you mention it, I think he sold his Burger King franchise, so the memorabilia is probably gone from whatever BK is still there. Viriditas (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont mind if you want to bring it on wiki, or answer there... JarrahTree 04:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JarrahTree. Thanks for the information. I have indefinitely blocked the editor in question. I tried to be kind about it, because I don't think they are acting in bad faith. They just don't understand. Cullen328 (talk) 04:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The genuine desire to edit constructively is obvious, but the confusing language usage is disruptive.

I would never utilise Indonesian wikipedia as a way of improving my competency in the language JarrahTree 07:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, JarrahTree. I have tried to learn several languages and know many words and phrases, but never achieved working competency. There is a certain competency level that does allow someone to contribute productively without true fluency. I worked with a young editor from a Spanish speaking country over ten years ago. Although her English was weak, she was very willing to learn. I am still in touch with her off-Wikipedia and she is now very close to fully fluent. Cullen328 (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jakartan swearwords not used - doh! - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Putu_Suhartawan. I dont think there is any comprehension of what being blocked means. JarrahTree 03:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The mystery is from very rough to clear, there seems a bit of a fox like issue... JarrahTree 03:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JarrahTree, I have revoked their talk page access and again encouraged them to edit the Indonesian Wikipedia instead. Cullen328 (talk) 03:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed you blocking said user over US election-related pages in ANI for a month. Might I suggest it be extended until the the votes are certified to prevent them from tampering with the election results while they are being counted? Borgenland (talk) 06:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Borgenland, if that editor returns to disruptive editing regarding the November 5 election, the next block will be swift and it will be lengthy. Cullen328 (talk) 06:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you blocked 2803:C600:8101:93FE:61FE:C8E2:1BE:5F0D (talk · contribs · WHOIS). The same editor appears to be vandalizing from 2803:C600:8101:93FE:5921:FE2F:369A:5710 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), so I think the block should be expanded to 2803:C600:8101:93FE:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (as explained in User:TonyBallioni/Just block the /64). Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jlwoodwa.  Done. Cullen328 (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I'm wrong, but I think your block was only for a single IP – it doesn't show up in the rangeblock section of Special:BlockList. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jlwoodwa, I blocked the /64 address you gave me. If you give me a better option, I will act. I will be off Wikipedia for a couple of hours. Cullen328 (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your kind and thoughtful handling of the situation with CKirby09. I'm pleased to hear they got their deleted content delivered. While not necessarily objecting to the initial block, I'm also glad to see they're now unblocked as well:) --DB1729talk 21:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, DB1729. Cullen328 (talk) 22:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]