User talk:Esprit15d

• From August 12, 2005 — December 31, 2005
• From January 1, 2006 — June 30, 2006
• From July 1, 2006 — December 31, 2006
• From January 1, 2007 — June 30, 2007
• From July 1, 2007 — December 31, 2007
• From January 1, 2008 — June 30, 2008
• From July 1, 2008 — December 31, 2008
• From January 1, 2009 — June 30, 2009
• From July 1, 2009 — December 31, 2010
• From January 1, 2010 — June 30, 2010
• From July 1, 2010 — December 31, 2010
• From January 1, 2011 — June 30, 2011
• From July 1, 2011 — June 30, 2014
• From July 1, 2014 — June 30, 2018
• From July 1, 2018 — December 31, 2018

"Last" is used for three or more things. "Latter" is used for two things.

I agree. The three things are "arson, manslaughter, and six counts of first-degree murder".

Thanks.

Eac2222 (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Rami Malek has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I certainly think the article is at the stage where it can be nominated, and would achieve, Good Article status.

Over the long term I have a couple of suggestions. I did not check, but I suspect that a number of statements are supported by two or three citations. This is overkill - one reputable/renowned source will do, as I'm sure you know. Not surprisingly with so many contributors the citation style is inconsistent and should also be looked at. Neither of these should prevent the article from achieving Good Article status. I like the fact it has not fallen prey to the tendency to include laundry lists of reviews, quotes etc... It is nice and succinct, covering the salient points,

Best of luck with the GA nomination when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist

@Twofingered Typist: Thank you so much for your feedback and help. I'll take a look at your suggestions. If I have any questions, I'll let you know. Thanks again.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Esprit15d: I saw your note to contributors to the Malek article. What I meant about the citations is to make sure the fields are in the correct order for the type of citation being used. For example the template cite web has the following in the order specified: For references with author credit

The cite web citation includes in this orderf: |url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= |quote=

For references without author credit

The cite web citation includes in this order |url= |title= |author= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= |quote=}}

The date of the article, and the date the article was accessed by the person using it as a citation will be different. An access-date must be included, but it will not match the article date.

This article Wikipedia:Citing sources (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources} has links to each of the types of citation and their format. I hope this clarifies what I meant, Sorry for the confusion. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of podcasting companies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC Radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am interested in an edit you made to the page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Tyrangiel

In which you wrote (and more recently reinstated) a "list of notable interviews"

Question: where is this information from?

Any help much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iaojiocoijcoij (talk • contribs) 03:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Iaojiocoijcoij:: At a glance, it appears that some of them already have references and some were cover articles (presumably from when he was at Time). I can't say for sure where that information was originally sourced from, but I can assist you in finding references. I'm working on another project at the moment, but when I get a chance, I'll drop in.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 03:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iaojiocoijcoij (talk • contribs) 04:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Icw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ^{[Username Needed]} 11:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Book Your Own Fucking Life. Since you had some involvement with the Book Your Own Fucking Life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Icw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ^{[Username Needed]} 14:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading ladies (game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading ladies (game) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Xain36 (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Rapture of Canaan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rapture of Canaan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Leviv ich 03:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dave Matthews Band - Bartender.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The-Lonely-Island-Popstar-Never-Stop-Never-Stopping-Album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esprit15d. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of accolades received by Amadeus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Sam's Town logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Esprit15d! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 15:02, Friday, April 19, 2019 (UTC)

I was looking at the Georgia Tann article, and noticed what looks like an error in the "Notable cases" section you added: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Georgia_Tann&diff=888117071&oldid=888045697

Based on the dates listed the babies in question would have been born ~ 1955, or 5 years after Georgia Tann's death. You've added a paper magazine as a reference here, so I can't check where the error originates. If you've still got access to that magazine, could you double check whether the numbers are correct? Or whether it is printing an interview that was conducted years earlier, maybe? --James (talk) 07:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@James:I didn't do the math when I added the statement, but you are correct, their birth would have been 5 years after she died. But, I reviewed the article again (you can see an abstract here: http://www.readabstracts(DOT)com/Family-and-marriage/Happy-families-As-young-as-they-feel-age-is-a-state-of-mind.html - replace "DOT" ) and it did say that her twins were born 37 years previously. So, clearly she's mistaken, and the article didn't fact check. I will just remove the statement from the article.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:With a Little Help From My Friends - Joe Cocker.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 06:59, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When I added the advertisement tag, I did nmot mean particularly advertising for the subject's firm, but for the causes they advocate for & the people they defend. No matter how highly I think of the merits, it still isn't right for an encyclopedia . DGG ( talk ) 02:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG:I admit a was a bit surprised to see that tag added. I am all for collaboration, so I read through the article again more critically, but I'm not really seeing any language that would justify a tag at the top of the article. I'm curious to know if you can give specific examples of as advocacy for the cause, promotional external links, or NPOV language. I'm open to discussion, but I'm not seeing a justification for the use of that tag. --Esprit15d • talk • contribs 02:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree we need a better tag to avoid confusion. I ought to write one. But I will also look again at the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We'll keep chipping away at it.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at it again. Problems include: the material and references discussing Kardashian West's sponsorship of her organization, which seems peripherial and disproportate in length. Then, there is some ambiguity in the number of people she for whom she helped get clemency for. It claims 17, which is probably the number for her organization as a whole. It only mentions two , and I assume these are ones for whome she was either the principal attorney, or one of the principal attorneys--it is't clear which. More basic, and what caught my eye, is section 3, discussing in some detail two of the cases, If we have articles on the cases, the material would belong there; I do not think we do, so probably a single sentence each might be appropriate. (they are also mentioned earlier, and I think that's the appropriate content) The inclusion of the comments of the judges is advocacy for the cause. The inclusion of herself praising her own work, complete with full caps, is puffery.

there are similar problems with some of the cases for Kathleen Zellner. How to balance articles on lawyers like this is a problem, that has not been solved. How to deal with tneed to advocate here for things one wants to advocate for is a recurrent problem. I personally tend to be rather cold-blooded, because I'm concerned with setting an example to be used by promotional editors writing articles for attorneys. But I can understand a view that one should get in as much information as one can without being too conspicuous about it. I would support full articles on the individuals in wrongful conviction cases whenever possible. DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG:I by no means think the article is complete or perfect. But, I'll address your specific issues individually: the material and references discussing Kardashian West's sponsorship of her organization, which seems peripherial and disproportate in length The references about Kim Kardashian's relation to the issue aren't really "references." They are substantiating the assertion in the article that the issue was widely reported on, which they undoubtedly were. The coverage of her involvement is not disproportionate either. Kardashian is the primary (if not sole) funder the effort and is essentially the "celebrity face" of Barnett, which Kardashian openly admits. As there is no question that Kardashian's personal meetings with Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, and other members of Trump's cabinet, as well as a meeting with the president himself (that he personally insisted be covered by the White House press staff as well outside reporters) is notable. True, whenever Kim Kardashian shows up (not to even mention Trump himself) the tone is a bit salacious because of their public images. But that is not relevant to the fact that it was a notable event and relevant to Barnett's efforts, since that meeting directly led to Trump continuing Obama's policy of clemency for nonviolent drug offenses (which I doubt he would have done otherwise), as well as the the introduction of the First Step Act into law.

It claims 17, which is probably the number for her organization as a whole. It only mentions two , and I assume these are ones for whome she was either the principal attorney, or one of the principal attorneys--it is't clear which.Barnett is the only attorney in her "organization," although she is a professor at her alma mater and enlists the help of the law students to do some of her research. The number 17 is the the prisoners that been released in the last three months--not total--and the article mentions that she worked with another attorney names MiAngel during the campaign. That is absolutely verifiable. I could actually include citations of docket cases in the article, but it would go against Wikipedia's policy WP:PRIMARY. Not all of the cases notable, and so not all of them are discussed here. I've only included cases that had wide media coverage.

In response to this: More basic, and what caught my eye, is section 3, discussing in some detail two of the cases. If we have articles on the cases, the material would belong there; I do not think we do, so probably a single sentence each might be appropriate., while I respect your opinion, it doesn't reflect [Wikipedia policy or precedent: there is EXTENSIVE precedent in Wikipedia for law offices, lawyers, and judges articles to include notable cases. Barnet has litigated MANY cases, not only in advocacy, but in the financial world. However, most of them are not notable and should not be included in wikipedia. The ones included, however, are notable, because they received widespread coverage in the media. This is the equivalent of a singer articles including coverage his/her discography, or a senator's article including coverage of principle legislation that she/he authored. Covering summaries of notable cases of a lawyer is the same. For examples of other comparable articles that have FA or GA standing, see the following: Jack Thompson (activist), Sonia Sotomayor, F. Lee Bailey, Antonin Scalia, Henry W. Sawyer, Kenesaw Mountain Landis, Learned Hand, Tom Denning, Baron Denning, Richard Goldstone, Patrick Hastings, Adrian S. Fisher, Ted Frank, Clifford Scott Green. I'll also include my comments on the talk page of the article.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll reply on the article talk p. , DGG ( talk ) 10:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

but, briefly,1/not all have discussion of individual cases; 2/ the ones that do have less detailed discussion of the individual cases they mention--sometimes very much less discussion; 3 /it's more justified in an article about a supreme court judge, whose rulings make actual law 4/some of this are truly historic cases, 4/ WP:EINSTEIN . DGG ( talk ) 03:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QF-NPOV, Template:QF-source, Template:QF-tags, Template:QF-unfolding and Template:QF-unstable have been nominated for merging with Template:QF. Since you had some involvement with the creation of these templates, you might be interested in participating in the discussion. e^πi (talk | contribs) 00:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Esprit15d. In script edits like this one, is it intentional that the month year date in the "use mdy" template is being updated from when the template was added to the current month? -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JHunterJ: Yes. According to the template usage notes, "Use the parameter |date= for the month and year that an editor or bot last checked the article for inconsistent date formatting and fixed any found." Happy editing!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scott Brothers Global, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Make Your Move (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Producers-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Scott-Living-Logo-Final-300x300.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Scott Brothers Entertainment.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Scott Brothers logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scott Brothers Global, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Wang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ocean's 12 soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Ocean's Twelve#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I placed the article Rami Malek on hold, I've also placed my comments concerning the article here. Please feel free to message me on my Talk Page if you have any questions or obligations. NightBag10 (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering how changing № to No. can be considered a spelling/typo issue when the numero sign article itself utilises №? Also, what's wrong with №? DynamoDegsy (talk) 11:09, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DynamoDegsy:, please refer to policy MOS:NUMBERSIGN.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 21:05, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See this discussion at MOS. Internal consistency is more important, and in that article's case I was following the style of a source I had quoted. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 09:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the edits you made to the New Albion article. Your edits are not ones with which I am familiar, and I appreciate the assistance in improving this article. I will adapt my future writing to incorporate what I learned from your work.Hu Nhu (talk) 01:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hu Nhu:Glad I could help!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 01:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derek Waters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Second City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Walter Mercado, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've opened a GAR on the The Killers article for which you are a main contributor. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding sourcing and other issues. Following the guidelines at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment, I'm letting you know in case you're interested in helping to resolve the concerns, though you are under no obligation to do anything. See Talk:The Killers/GA1 for more details. SilkTork (talk) 05:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berndnaut Smilde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RWA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Esprit15d, just a reminder that you have had this review open for months, and had promised to return to it nearly three weeks ago. Please give it attention at your next opportunity. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Esprit15d, it's been another two weeks without any action on the review. I hope you're having a happy holiday season. If you can't return by the end of the year, I'll do my best to find a new reviewer; it isn't fair to the nominator to be left hanging for over three months like this. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider yourself off this review effective immediately. I will be finding a new reviewer. I'm sorry this didn't work out, but it's been nearly four months, which is too long to expect any nominator to wait. I hope you're having a Happy New Year. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Human penis size/Archive 2. Since you had some involvement with the Human penis size/Archive 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An older article of mine. Looks like a lot of the sources are 404 so that doesn't help. But this seems like exactly the kind of significant coverage we're looking for. I'm working on adding more Detroit Free Press articles to give historical context. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• ETA: One source I added claims that at the time of construction, it had the largest Montgomery Ward store in the chain. Given that notability is not temporary, would this be a sufficient enough claim to notability? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @TenPoundHammer:I saw that the article was created in the Wild West days of WP. But the Montgomery Ward mention definitely seems more notable.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:46, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • If you feel that's enough for notability, you can withdraw. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have recently opened a featured-article nomination for Aftermath (Rolling Stones album). I found your name at a past FA review and wanted to ask if you would be interested in offering a review to the nomination. isento (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WEASeL. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WEASeL redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on the Phoebe Judge additions! JoelWhy?(talk) 20:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! She deserves a quality article!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Phoebe Judge's signature.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

• File:Phoebe Judge's signature.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NCR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Infographics Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Infographics Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 17:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TIGlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I nominated the audio samples of "These Foolish Things (Remind Me of You)", which you uploaded, for discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 June 2#Recordings of "These Foolish Things (Remind Me of You)", to which I'm inviting you. --George Ho (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Exception(computing). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 5#Exception(computing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Tea2min (talk) 09:37, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Half Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Manchester by the Sea (film) (estimated annual readership: 685,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Reidgreg: Thank you! I'm sincerely delighted.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esprit15d. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Manchester by the Sea (film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 09:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramani Durvasula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramani Durvasula until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 11:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, please check that AWB is actually proposing sensible edits. In this edit, as well as usefully fixing a couple of slanted apostrophes, and adding birth and death date cats, you managed to add some stray commas before references. The next editor then reverted the whole lot. I've rescued what was OK of your edit, but please slow down and check. Thanks. PamD 14:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD:I think what happened is the original editor puts commas between references if there is more than one for some reason. AWB moved the comma before the reference, but there was also a period there. Anyway, if I see that again, I'll catch it.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:14, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that's not very clever of AWB! I've already dropped a note to the other editor to point out that refs aren't separated by either spaces or commas: couldn't find anything in MOS to say so but showed him the example of today's Featured Article as an example of how to do it. PamD 16:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD:Thanks for the heads up. I'll keep an eye out if I come across double punctuation again.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I see you just edited Krupp using AWB just after I edited it. Unfortunately the current released binary moves hatnotes above short description, in violation of MOS:ORDER. The AWB guys fixed the bug soon after releasing 6.1.0.1, nearly a year ago, and I've been trying to get their attention for a new binary. Other people have been fixing the bug with two double-clicks. I have a binary built from the latest source if you're interested. David Brooks (talk) 17:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidBrooks:Thanks for letting me know! I wasn't aware. I'll keep that in mind going forward. BTW, I wasn't correcting your edit deliberately; the timing on that was coincidence.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't mean that to sound like an accusation! Thanks for responding. And I said two double-clicks because, unfortunately, AWB diff sees the change as separate delete+insert (not move) so you have to undo both changes. David Brooks (talk) 18:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidBrooks:I took it as you meant it. Thanks again for the tip!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 21:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UE has been nominated for merging with Template:Uselanguage. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:LIVE. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 1#Wikipedia:LIVE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sysages (talk | contribs) 17:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Esprit15d, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have another new member with years of Wikipedia experience. I see you've created a number of biographies, including several about women. We look forward to many more. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott:Thank you so much for the welcome, and I can't wait to help out. I will look over that essay. Thanks again!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179 Online events: Annual Ada Lovelace Day celebratiaon: Women in STEM Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): Women in Asia Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Clocks. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 29#Clocks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rreagan007 (talk) 15:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Me and Bobby McGee - Roger Miller.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To create a ping, you must simultaneously place a ping template and sign a post. Adding a ping to an existing talk item does nothing (to make it work, you’d also have to change the signature time stamp). Schwede66 19:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181 Online events: New: Textile arts | Stage+Screen+Radio+Podcast Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): Women in Asia Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Template:Duflu has been nominated for merging with Template:Needtrans. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. – SD0001 (talk) 06:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:CRYSTAL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Presidency of Joe Biden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Presidency of Joe Biden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 22:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esprit15d! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zoozaz1 talk 22:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI for anyone reading this--this wasn't my article. I was trying to determine if an article that was in drafts related to the Biden presidency with a soft redirect had to be used, or if we could start over from scratch. We ultimately started over from scratch because the draft version was in poor condition.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erick Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lawndale, Chicago.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Erick Williams, is too highly promotional as written to remain published. It needs to not resemble a web page or advertisement for the chef or his restaurant. Probably removing the quotations would be a good first step, but it would need considerable rewriting. I would have listed it for deletion except that it ddes have decent references. (and remove the see also's to better-known chefs--that's namedropping) I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @DGG:While I respect your opinion, I am not a fan of this chef, nor do I have any particular interest in him beyond the fact that he is repeatedly coming up in my online and radio journey, and he merits an article. I have been adding information to his article as I've perused sources and listened to interviews, which I am still in the process of doing. Also, those chefs are not namedropping whatsoever, they are all chefs in the Chicago gastronomic community, especially that make ethnocentric cuisine. You may not realize he is that same caliber chef as they are, and was the executive chef at MK for years.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 11:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you have no COI, but it is customary to ask.

listing better known people as see also (or in the article) without a very direct connection with the subject, not just " chefs in ... Chicago" is unambiguously name dropping. You seem to have made it much worse. It needs to be half the length, not double He probably deserves an article, so why not write something that doesnt sound like PR? DGG ( talk ) 17:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG:I'm sincerely at a loss at what about it sounds like PR, especially since writing about him feels like another day at the office. I just re-read the policy on NPOV to see if there was something I was missing: my sources are unbiased, I don't make any subjective assertions about him (e.g "he's an outstanding chef"), I've included "verifiable public and scholarly critiques", couldn't find any weasel words. I also didn't see any undue weight on any particular topic, although I'd welcome specific feedback if someone disagreed with that. I deleted the See Also section (shrug). To be honest, I don't really "write" articles ever, especially in this case since my knowledge of him is limited. I'm just building it based on sources I have access to: Newspaper.com, Ebscohost, Gale, Google (obviously) through my Wikipedia library account. I am making my way through the sources about him, and if there is something that seems biographic in it, I add it to the article with a reference. Many of the articles I skip because it's just him talking with another chef or interviewer about Chicago, or Brionna Taylor, or his grandma. So asking me to not write PR, from my perspective, seems like, don't add what you see in the sources. Because I completely ambivalent about this topic. If you gave more specific feedback I could review it for what your'e referring to.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we were passing each other. I'll review your comments.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just mentioning, it's not that it's PR, but that it reads like PR. It can be very hard to avoid, since almost all the writing in the sources is PR. DGG ( talk ) 18:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First 100 days of Joe Biden's presidency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First 100 days of Joe Biden's presidency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 20:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for helping out with DYK reviews. Please read WP:DYK and WP:DYKSG to familiarize yourself with all the criteria. I have just returned Template:Did you know nominations/Michelle Curran to the nominations page because you gave approval ticks without even doing a review. Yoninah (talk) 19:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Don Henley - Boys of Summer.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sean Cole at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Innisfree987 (talk) 00:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These notices always seem to be in a hurry, so just to say, no rush. Happy editing, Innisfree987 (talk) 00:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183 Online events: New: Women who died in 2020 | Philanthropists Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): Women in Asia Other ways to participate: Help us plan future events Join the conversations on our talkpage Become a member Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessie Maltin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Maltin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've begun my first pass at copyediting the article Ira Glass. Please expect a ping on the article's talk page as I will most likely have questions. My process can be found here. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) (🎁 Wishlist! 🎁) 21:33, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sean Cole, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that This American Life producer and Boston native Sean Cole spoke with an affected British accent from age 14 to 16? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sean Cole. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sean Cole), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Esprit15d, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 05:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Celebrate this Christmas with great joy, happiness and gratitude. Merry Christmas to you and your family!RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 05:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:DJ Sammy - Boys of Summer.ogg and File:The Ataris - Boys Of Summer.ogg, which you listed, are listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 December 27. --George Ho (talk) 07:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188 Online events: New: