User talk:Malmfridrthenone

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Further-eastern European Time—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Politics of Turkey. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Politics of Turkey, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Politics of Turkey was changed by Fatihoztrk950 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878764 on 2020-11-14T16:02:33+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fatihoztrk950! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Turkey. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Turkey. Shadow4dark (talk) 20:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Antalyaspor season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adama Traoré. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2021–22 Fenerbahçe S.K. season, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sakiv (talk) 19:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My edits were constructive but we are all humans and are prone to making mistakes. Kindly assume good faith next time when writing edit summaries like these.--Sakiv (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you removed the flags. I urge you to reply to my messages until we agree on a solution. Clubs always represent their association even if they are playing against local clubs.--Sakiv (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! First of all, please be polite when making edit summaries. On the other hand, I guess we are nearing an WP:WAR. If you have a WP standard or regulation that the football team roster is sorted always after club numbers, then please tell me where I can learn more about it. Otherwise, when all the players' position are known, it is much better to sort after the position. When most of players' position are unknown, then a sorting after the club number is more useful. I appreciate to have your opinion before I resort the roster. CeeGee 11:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you've been here for a while, so you should have heard of a few policies and guidelines and possibly even helpful essays which interpret them by now, several of which are relevant to your recent changes to the 2021-22 Fenerbahçe S.K. season article. I'll list them here: WP:CITE, WP:VERIFIABILITY, WP:RS and WP:TRUTH. This list is by no means exclusive, and I would expect you to be aware of these by now, but just in case you aren't, here they are, and please read all of them.

I do not dispute the correct-ness of what you added, but I do have an issue with it not being sourced. If it is information already available in the existing sources for the article, then please include inline citations to those sources, per WP:CITE, and if not, then find reliable sources for it, and add those to the article, with inline citations, per WP:CITE.

If you have any further questions please let me know, and I will endeavour to assist. Mako001 (C)  (T)  03:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on New Gaziantep Stadium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kadı Message 19:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Gaziantep Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Gaziantep Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kadı Message 10:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fatihoztrk950

Thank you for creating Çotanak Sports Complex.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fatihoztrk950, why reverting to changes? There aren't wrong info, you can change to words. Regards, Zafer (talk) 20:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Fenerbahçe S.K. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Siebert.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

in spite of the Erdogan government's proclamation, the English-language WP:COMMONNAME of this country remains "Turkey", and it is Wikipedia policy to use that name. Please don't make any similar changes to other articles. Please see the WP:COMMONNAME policy page for more information. — The Anome (talk) 19:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have read your warning. But the edit I made is on the infobox. Turkey's official name in the eyes of the United Nations has now been changed to "Türkiye". Although this seems to be a declaration of the Erdogan government, the name "Türkiye" is used in the international arena. You can also see on the pages of the President and Vice President of Turkey that the page name remains in English as per the Wikipedia policy, but this is only applied on the articles and information boxes. Considering all this, I want you to reconsider. Fatihoztrk950 (talk) 09:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The IP address I use to contribute to Wikipedia has been blocked for weeks. My IP address ST47ProxyBot has been blocked by the user. I request that this IP address be unblocked so that I can transfer the correct information as quickly as possible. Fatihoztrk950 (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:İstanbul Başakşehir F.K. sections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw you used the name "Türkiye" as the name of the country generally known in English as "Turkey" in your recent edit.

While this is indeed the correct name for that country in the Turkish language, in spite of the Erdoğan government's proclamation and the United Nations' adoption of their preferred name, the English-language WP:COMMONNAME of this country remains "Turkey", and it is Wikipedia policy to use that name when writing in the English language in Wikipedia's voice.

Please note that this is not because of anti-Turkish bias or a desire not to keep up with the times; it's that English Wikipedia follows English language usage, not prescriptions by any one group, no matter how official. Please be assured that if mainstream English language use changes (as it did, for example, with "Bombay" changing to Mumbai and "Peking" changing to Beijing), English Wikipedia policy will follow that change, for exactly the same reason that it resists the change now. The WP:COMMONNAME and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names) pages have more information on this.

If you would like to dispute this, please take this up at Talk:Turkey, where the issue has been discussed repeatedly and at great length. Please don't make any similar changes to other articles unless this is first endorsed by community consensus. — The Anome (talk) 16:53, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2023–24 Süper Lig, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You changed the start date of all ministers in Turkey to 7 June when their oath in the parliament. Taking an oath of ministers in Turkey isn't an legal obligation, just a symbolic ceremony. Ministers begin their offices on the day when publish their appointment of president's decisions in the Official Gazette. For your information. Uncitoyen (talk) 23:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the previous period, the date of taking the oath was shown as 10 July, in Presidency sources and other sources. That's why I made such an arrangement. Fatihoztrk950 (talk) 10:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's a little confusing. According to the Constitution of Turkey, the MPs and the president must take an oath in the Parliament in order to start office officially. Now in some cases, the ministers take the oath a few days after their appointment. For example, newly persons in some ministries in the 66th Government didn't take an oath in the Parliament of Turkey on the day they were appointed, however served as a minister. The President taked an oath in on 9 July 2018. The appointment decision of ministers was taken on 9 July, published in the Official Gazette on 10 July and the ministers taked an oath in that day. In 2023, some things were a little more complicated because all the former ministers became new MPs. So the ceremony oath of the newly appointed ministers and the obligatory oath ceremonies of the former ministers who were elected new MPs were a bit delayed. Your edits were normal in difficult process of Turkey, but not true. Thanks. Uncitoyen (talk) 11:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I got more accurate information on this subject. :) Fatihoztrk950 (talk) 13:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tarver05. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fenerbahçe S.K. (football), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tarver05 (talk) 16:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fenerbahçe S.K. (football), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Tarver05 (talk) 22:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Tarver05 (talk) 14:45, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fenerbahçe23.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 07:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please check edit history without editing randomly? Beshogur (talk) 10:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ziraat Turkish Cup Vertical Logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 21:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Turkey. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Austronesier (talk) 21:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on List of Süper Lig broadcasters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Süper Lig broadcasters. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SpacedFarmer (talk) 12:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fenerbahçe logo.svg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]