User talk:Lemonaka

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: Eastern Europe or the Balkans He should not be given alerts for those areas.

This is Lemonaka's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Pending changes backlog
(review log)

Low backlog

[view • purge • update]

---

5 pages according to DatBot 23:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism information

Low to moderate level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

---

3.25 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 22:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed the new section your started at ANI that was repetitious and disruptive. I am AGFing that this was just an outlier-action born out of frustration. Nevertheless such actions end up both needlessly escalating drama and wasting valuable community time. Please move on. Abecedare (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lemonaka! I hope all is well. I am here to ask about your questionable comment for declining. For the reason of declining, it was put "This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission." Which is fair enough. Yet, for the AFC comment, you didn't provide what specifically was wrong, only one remark about a certain portion, saying " "Yet the Mononobe sent for him to go "Fishing", this was an attempt at making him Emperor. This failed." what the hell is that???". That is absolutely nothing to go off, and gives me no clues as to what specifically is the problem, and what specifically you think should be changed. I changed that bit of the article you asked for, but what else needs to be done? Please do not review the article if you will not provide sufficient reasoning or context clues. I mean this in absolutely no negative way, this is merely constructive criticism and I would like that for the article.

All the best- Camillz. Camillz (talk) 13:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but what's the meaning of go "fishing", attempt to make who to become emporer? what failed? You need more context for explain such content, and on the time when I reviewed your draft, there is no reference for that -Lemonaka 15:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fishing. As in he was taken to "Go fishing" but in actuality they wanted to take him to crown him Emperor, which I have edited. Please attempt to be more professional with this! Camillz (talk) 00:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Camillz Sure, I've reviewed the content after your change, this read better. -Lemonaka 13:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!

All the best - Camillz (talk) 12:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to place a hatnote to indicate a place to look for reduplications that would have similar/same pronunciations. Otherwise, there'd be a larger hatnote. There are other topics to find later such as Baum Baum and Bomb Bomb; as "Bom Bom" was listed at "Boom Boom", and "Baum" and "Bomb" are listed at BOM; those would seem to be the likely locations to list other confusable similar pronounciated terms. -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 03:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@64.229.88.34 That's a wrongly clicked revert, I've restored it. -Lemonaka 03:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the response -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 03:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lemonaka,

I noticed that you declined the submission with the comment "Regional initiatives need more source".

I understand that the official website for the organization is not enough as a reference to the initiative.

The regional initiatives section is not fundamental, if I remove that section will the page be accepted?

Thanks for you help Extrasua (talk) 16:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Extrasua A lot of sentences, in fact, need footnotes or citation, for example, "Donors have included the European Commission and the governments of Ireland, Norway, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Canada and the United Kingdom. et,al." in the #objectives, "it's a member of three NGO networks: the Mediation Support Network, alongside the Alliance for Peacebuilding, and the European Peacebuilding Liaison Office. Their international council includes Gareth Evans, John Carlin, Nasser Saidi and Shaharzad Akbar." in the Organisation Structure and so on before publishing, that means you still need a major revision.
Anyway, thanks for your questions and improvement. -Lemonaka 22:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]