User talk:Macrobreed2

You can type your message here regarding any issue with my edits or any requests for article creation. I will try to reply here.

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not notable.

Qcne (talk) 13:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Macrobreed2, just saw your comment on the draft.

If you want to continue to work on the draft then feel free, and ping me on my user talk page if you think the person is notable.

However in it's present state it is totally unsuitable for Wikipedia:

- three sections have no sources.

- I do not think this person is fundamentally notable, please read WP:BLP1E.

- I am really concerned that you have written your draft using ChatGPT or another Large Language Model? It has all the hallmarks of being generated by a Chatbot. Don't do that.

Let me know if you have any questions. Qcne (talk) 14:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Qcne, Thank you for your detailed feedback.

- The person in question has recently deceased, and a lot of new reference articles are currently being published on the topic. I will add these references accordingly and will ping you once I have done so.

- I have read and understood the possible issues of notability as per WP:BLP1E.

- I have indeed taken help from GPT-4o for writing the article, but I will work on neutralizing and improving the draft myself.

Thank you once again for taking the time to explain the issues. I appreciate your help :-)

Best regards, Macrobreed2 (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Qcne, I have made the necessary changes to Draft:Shiladitya Chetia and fixed most of the issues. I would like you to review the draft once again. I have not applied it for AFC again as you have added the STOP warning. Kindly let me know the outcome. Regards, Macrobreed2 (talk) 14:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Macrobreed2 thanks, I have reverted the rejection and re-submitted it. Qcne (talk) 12:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday! Hi Macrobreed2! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shiladitya Chetia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maheep Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HitroMilanese, Thanks for highlighting the issues in Draft:Maheep Singh. I would see if other reliable sources exist and add them. Regards Macrobreed2 (talk) 10:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Poornima University

added links pointing to Urban and University Grants Commission

JECRC University

added a link pointing to Urban

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A note to other users - I have fixed the above mentioned disambiguation links. Macrobreed2 (talk) 09:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]