User talk:Svartulfr1

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Rockpocket 21:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have tagged the articles K. Brent Olsen, Sequoia Psychotherapy Center & San Francisco Bay Psychotherapy Center for notability concerns. Please see WP:BIO for guidelines on the notability of biographies and WP:CORP for guideliines concerning businesses. If you can add any information to these pages that meets these guidelines, I'd suggest doing so very soon. Articles that lack sufficient notability are often deleted. -- Scientizzle 22:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Svartulfr1!

Welcome to Wikipedia. I’ve seen your copyedits in the Anti-psychiatry article, which I and other editors rewrote last March.

Can I ask you a favor? When planning doing lots of copyedits, can you copy and paste the whole article (in Edit mode!) to your word processor and make the changes there before posting it again with your changes? It’s difficult for me, who edit Wikipedia only on Sundays, to track down dozens of very minor copyedits in the article.

Perhaps you may find it interesting the antipsychiatry-related articles I have created (just take a look at my user page)?

Welcome again and have fun! —Cesar Tort 04:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about editing the articles in the wikipedia program. I will try to be sure to use my word processor program to edit articles at all times prior to doing the permanent edits here... Also, thanks for your referencing of some interesting articles you have put together...

Hi there,

I thought you might also be interested in this daughter project of wikipedia, The Psychology Wiki. You are just the kind of contributor we are looking for there.

Tom Michael - Mostly Zen (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there... In reviewing for orphaned files, I have found the following images that you have uploaded as public domain, but do not appear to be used in any way. Please place a link in some article or user space or tag them for deletion by placing the {{db-author}} template on the image page. If there are any questions, please let me know.

• Image:Welcome to Tijuana.JPG
• Image:Male breast.jpg
• Image:Man Shaving Pubic Hair.jpg

--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 14:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Male breast.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 18:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you still consider yourself active? Also, I'm trying to put together a new WikiProject called WikiProject Mental Health (fundamentally different from Psychology). There are gaping holes on Wikipedia in relation to this topic. Would you be interested? Get to know me on my user page and we'll discuss. NinaOdell | Talk 18:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in User:Audacity/Userboxes/WSPQ, which is a replacement for the old Political Chart userbox. The new userbox takes the two variables (economic and personal freedom), calculates which political alignment they place you into (Statist, Libertarian, Liberal, Centrist, or Conservative), and links your userpage to the appropriate category.

Please reply to User talk:Audacity, as I will not be watching your talk page. Λυδαcιτγ 07:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm trying to get members of the Psychology Project to get together and rate the both the quality and importance of the Tree of Knowledge System, along with discussing ways to improve the article. Hope you're interested. Have a great day! EPM 14:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Lynn Scoresby, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Scoresby. Thank you. Steve Carlson^Talk 06:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, i would appreciate it if you could voice your opinion on the article Anthrosexual, which is currently up for deletion.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 06:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been invited to join the San Jose Sharks task force, a task force under WikiProject Ice Hockey. We are dedicated to improving the San Jose Sharks-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in San Jose Sharks and/or your many edits to San Jose Sharks articles. If you would like to join, please visit the task force page, and add your name to the list of active project members. Thank you. LegoKontribsTalkM 04:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this task force is still unofficial, and I would like to have at least five members before asking for approval from WP:HOCKEY.

Hi, I see you haven't made any edits for a while. Are you still interested in being involved in the above project? --Simon Speed (talk) 14:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ronald K. Barrett, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? 70.186.172.75 (talk) 19:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider adding any input to our proposal regarding the DSM-IV. Input is being collected on our talk page. Thanks! Mindsite (talk) 22:09, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Admrb♉ltz (talk) 22:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC) via AWB[reply]

Hello, Svartulfr1. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip (Feb 2009) (UTC)

Better late the never! 10 months after the invitation: welcome! hope to see you involved the squad more.

Articles tagged for deletion and rescue Category Articles tagged for deletion and rescue not found Hi, Svartulfr1, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, which can be fixed and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! Some points that may be helpful: Our main aim is to help improve articles, so if someone seeks help, please try to assist if you are able. Likewise feel free to ask for help, advice and clarification. Many times we are asked to help rescue articles by people new to our notability and sourcing policies. If the article is not fixable we can help explain why and offer alternatives. Many of these editors are also new to Wikipedia so may see deleting "their" article as "bitey". Encourage civility and maybe even {{welcome}} them if they have only been templated with deletion messages. The Articles for deletion (AfD) discussion is where the concerns regarding each article are brought up and addressed. To be an effective member of the project you need to know how AfD works as well as how to improve articles. Introduction to deletion process gives a good overview and some good advice for newcomers to deletion. Our primary work is improving articles tagged for rescue. On this template you can see a drop-down list of current articles tagged. You can install it on your own page by putting {{ARS/Tagged}}. A more dynamic list with article links and description is on our current articles page. It is highly recommended you watchlist it. If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to the list of translators available. Articles and sources that use non-English languages often need translation for those of us who cannot translate for ourselves. Many important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is recommended that you watchlist it. If you have any questions, feel free to post a question on the talk page. And once again — Welcome! Ikip 21:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue | Next issue

Content

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The article Patrick McCollum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to meet notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 16:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:California Center.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned personal image

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]