User talk:Symon777

Hi Symon777! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Creating Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Symon777! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Add Review Button, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Symon777! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reasons, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eskiarab without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ost (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wario-Man ^talk 11:42, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Markussep ^Talk 11:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MARKUSSEP YOU ARE NOT PRO YOU ARE SELFISH Symon777 (talk) 11:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. GiantSnowman 11:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 11:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as though this account may be editing in cooperation with another account, operated either by you or by someone else working with you. Sometimes people use more than one account for dishonest purposes, and because of that we unfortunately have to have measures to prevent abuse. If the two accounts are both operated by you, then you should stick to your original account. Whether they are both operated by you or not, you should read Wikipedia's policy on use of multiple accounts, to make sure you avoid problems. JBW (talk) 12:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Ownership of content. You do not own any articles. No articles are yours. Articles can be edited by any editor who follows the policies and guidelines. Stop this behavior. Cullen328 (talk) 15:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Symon777 (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on House of khadijah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Symon777. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kitkontepa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]