User talk:Will Beback

This user may have left Wikipedia. Will Beback has not edited Wikipedia since March 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Revision list Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006  March 2006  April 2006  May 2006   June 2006   July 2006  August 2006  September 2006  October 2006  November 2006  December 2006  January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011  June 2011  July 2011  August 2011  September 2011  October 2011  Nov/Dec 2011  January 2012 

Hope you come back one day. --evrik (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will, I hope that ArbCom takes up your appeal and agrees to allow you to return to editing. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

redacted

Have restored this content. No reason to delete it without going through proper channels. Arbcom is free to not comment. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#change_to_block_of_User:Will_Beback I've asked the Arbitration Committee about its response to the unblock request. —rybec 21:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that you can soon continue the necessary, good work that you did if you can promise not be overzealous again and promise not to out people again. Andries (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, suspended Will Beback's ("WBB") site-ban on the following terms:

The record of the vote on the motion can be seen here. For the Arbitration Committee, Carcharoth (talk) 02:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Live long and prosper! Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back from me too! TFD (talk) 03:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What they said. Writegeist (talk) 04:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, welcome back! Herostratus (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great news. I personally really missed you in the areas where I edit. I'm sure you'll find enough to do outside your topic ban areas to keep you busy! Dougweller (talk) 05:39, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Winter's over and Will's back? It's a good week for RL and WP. Rivertorch (talk) 13:29, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 13:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. Andries (talk) 20:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hereby join the chorus of people happy to see you back. Guy (Help!) 22:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this today! It always makes me happy to see an act of justice such as this, although the restriction prohibiting policy discussion is still pretty absurd. Welcome back! ThemFromSpace 20:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

O! Happy Day! Will is Back! ```Buster Seven Talk 05:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I check your pages every couple of months to see the progress of your exile, and now, finally, you are back! Wikipedia is better for it. Welcome back to the Monkey House. Randy Kryn 18:46 22 May 2014 (UTC)

welcome back Will, the name truly fits, will be back :) look forward to seeing you in all the old places. Darkstar1st (talk) 09:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the "List of people who have learned Transcendental Meditation"? It's gone! What to do?! I've spent a lot of time updating it, as I suppose you have too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.41.49.93 (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]  

I've unblocked you per the motion suspending your site ban and will be sending a final e-mail to conclude the appeal process. I removed the tags from your user page and user talk page and reduced the protection level on your user page to allow you to edit it. Please feel free to archive your talk page in due course, though you should keep a copy of the restrictions available to refer to. Additionally, as you requested by e-mail, I'm stating here that the terms of your unban do not permit you to discuss or comment on the case that led to your ban. If you have any further questions relating to your restrictions, please e-mail us (the Arbitration Committee) in the first instance. Carcharoth (talk) 03:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was gonna say, it's a true test of a person to take his lumps and get back on the horse. I assumed that that you were about to pass that test since you went to the trouble of applying for reinstatement. But you haven't edited since your reinstatement after all, so dunno.

Of course maybe you're burned out or disgusted or disappointed or whatever. Of course it's 100% OK not to edit anymore, it's all purely voluntary here.

I know what I'd do though. I was kicked out of the admin corps for (IMO) insufficient reason and some people figured that I'd leave in a huff. I didn't and I like that about myself. It's a hard-knock world after all.

Everybody's different though. No criticism implied. It's entirely possible that editing doesn't work for you anymore and it's important to do what works for oneself. Best wishes whatever you do. Herostratus (talk) 18:21, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I second the motion. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 18:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect September 11, 2011 attacks. Since you had some involvement with the September 11, 2011 attacks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 23:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GuruDevtint.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:02, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GuruDevtint.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:01, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have unprotected your talk page per WP:PP. Indefinite protections of talk pages are rarely used now and when talk pages are protected, should be accompanied by an unprotected subpage. If you continue to experience persistent vandalism, you may request a short term protection of your page at WP:RFPP. Mkdw^talk 14:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Jay8962/Fair Oaks Pharmacy and Soda Fountain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 17:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A case (Transcendental Meditation movement) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 20:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Clintogate. Since you had some involvement with the Clintogate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That sardonic quip at the Armenian fellow who was banned a while back about belonging to Conservapedia was lovely, considering, you know, Conservapedia bans dissenters of the hivemind, which you did because of your own commonplace belief.--Sıgehelmus (Talk) |д=) 22:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tourism in Cumberland, Maryland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourism in Cumberland, Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TaylorMoore2 (talk) 20:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fifth Helena Drive. Since you had some involvement with the Fifth Helena Drive redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you suggested to me, I've done! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Cizek https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cizek_Model_One THX! --Paolippe (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teardrop trailer (truck) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teardrop trailer (truck) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nordic Nightfury 15:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Beatles at Rishikesh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In appreciation of your tactful handling of the obvious COI at the page for A&F. Nuff said. Rags (talk) 12:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When I say this hopped that Will Was Back. Unfortunately he has not made an edit since 2014. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jessica Taylor (The Platters). Since you had some involvement with the Jessica Taylor (The Platters) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Anomalocaris (talk) 05:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Reflections of an American Political Prisoner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention is called to the discussion here, suggesting retitling Los Angeles Task Force to Los Angeles County Task Force. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MERU, Holland. Since you had some involvement with the MERU, Holland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Nowak Kowalski (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am WP:boldly culling the membership list of the Los Angeles Area Task Force. Some people don’t participate any more. Because you joined more than ten years ago, I am asking if you still want to be listed as a participant. I’ll be deleting those who say no or don’t answer, and then we can move merrily forward. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to be a part of WikiProject Backpacking, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to backpacking. To accept this invitation, click here!

Please consider returning to the project. —philoserf (talk) 01:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]