Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nepal

Archives

1

hi, I am a fan trying to create a page for Nepali film director Hem Raj BC who directed popular movie Jerryy & Hostel (2013 film). It seems that most of his works have a wikipedia but his bio was not found here. Could some of you guys help me as it has not been able to pass for conflict of interest. Could someone help with the editing as well? thank you!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hem_Raj_BC

my openion : remove all unwanted sources and content form article. Endrabcwizart (talk)

Hello @Endrabcwizart:, Ok, You will not be the part of COI as I will look this draft and do some correction if necessary. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 14:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kirat Mundhum (also Kirati Mundhum), are the stories recited/sung by the shamans^{[added here]} (called 'Fedangma/Samba') of the Kirati ethnic groups of the Indian subcontinent^{[added here]}: Limbu, Rai, Sunuwar and Yakkha peoples.^[1]

Since creation in 2008, Kirat Mundhum has been described as the religion of the Kira[n]ts of Nepal, not a bunch of "stories", until this IP edit in October.

Furthermore, the Kirats appear to be a Himalayan people, mostly of Nepal; changing their territory to "Indian subcontinent" (here), makes about as much sense as saying they're from "the Eurasian continent". Formerly, it just said "of Nepal and India" (until this edit added a bunch of countries not supported by the following ref). Probably it should just go back to saying, "Nepal and India" again (or "northern"/"Himalayan" India, or some such). Mathglot (talk) 02:09, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all! I'm looking for a picture of a Menstruation hut. Anyone? Please? :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pande family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is currently at good article nominations as an old review, but the nominator is an IP with few edits. The article isn't in pass shape currently; I was wondering before I removed it however if there would be anyone willing to work on the article to address issues and adopt the nom? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 17:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The population data for villages in Nepal that are provided in articles seems to be very much out of date or inaccurate, according to a sampling of a few in Sindhupalchok District, namely:

• Choukati & Maneshwara — data for 1991.
• Pagretar — data for 1991, and unverified data for 2001.
• Pedku — unverified data for 2001 or 2013.
• Tauthali — unverified data for 2001 or 2013, and unverified data for unstated year.

Today I have updated each of these with data from the 2011 census (the most recent one).

I suggest that each village in Nepal with a Wikipedia article be updated to provide number of people (men and women) and number of households. This can be done by following the examples on the abovementioned pages that I have already updated, using a format like:
{{As of|2011|alt=In 2011}} the official population was 2762 (1507 females and 1255 males) in 776 households.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://cbs.gov.np/wp-content/upLoads/2018/12/23-Sindhupalchowk_VDCLevelReport.pdf |title= SINDHUPALCHOWK |volume=Volume 06, NPHC2011 |at=Table 2.1: Households, population and average household size. Data for "Tauthali". |work=National Population and Housing Census 2011 (Village Development Committee/Municipality) |via=https://cbs.gov.np/vdc-municipality-in-detail/ |publisher=Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), National Planning Commission Secretariat, Government of Nepal |place=Kathmandu, Nepal |date=19 March 2014 |publicationdate=2018 |accessdate=2019-06-25 |deadurl= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |df= |format=PDF }}</ref>
Obviously the data in bold need to be changed for other villages in Sindhupalchok District, and various additional entries would need to be adapted for other districts.

This could be done entirely manually. Alternatively, some clever person might be able to create a convenient template like {{Nepal-village-population|2011|Tauthali|p=2762|f=1507|m=1255|h=776}}. Ideally some extremely clever person would create a bot, but with the variation in spelling of the village names, this seems impractical.

By the way, I still think the issue of verifying "official" English names of Nepali villages needs more attention.

—DIV (1.144.107.163 (talk) 13:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, Please note that Butter churning in Nepal, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team[reply]

I'm creating stubs for National Assembly members. I am currently focusing on Nepal Communist Party members. Stubs created so far: Nainakala Ojha, Bina Pokharel, Khem Raj Nepali and Aagam Prasad Bantawa Rai. Any help, feedback, corrections or reliable sources suggestion is welcome, thanks! --MarioGom (talk) 11:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After 2015, the Provinces of Nepal came to be. The five old articles for the development regions still exist, and they're generally poorly cited or just stubs. I suggest that someone with more expertise to just merge all of the necessary information from the articles to the main Development regions of Nepal article and then redirect all of them there. If there is some information that pertains to the new provinces, it can be added to those articles instead.

The old development region articles:

Eastern Development Region, Nepal

Central Development Region, Nepal

Western Development Region, Nepal

Mid-Western Development Region, Nepal

Far-Western Development Region, Nepal

It's not even really that difficult, but as so much of the information is uncited, I'm not sure where to begin myself. Maybe very little of it is really needed. Mr. Magoo (talk) 21:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Magoo and McBarker, they have scope for full expansion as standalone articles. So, I am inclined to leave them be. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 18:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could some brave soul please take a look at this page. Seriously, it has to be one of the worst pages I have seen on WP. I think it needs a total re-write, massive update, or revert to about 2010, or earlier.

Eg "For an entire generation of students in the 1970s, Bidehanagar was a codeword for fierce resistance, ceaseless struggle and spirit of sacrifice." 😲 That's been on the page for nearly 3 years. Unsourced, of course. 220 of ^Borg 08:23, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done you haven't seen a lot of Nepal-related articles then , 220 of Borg, -- Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True, but I have had quite a bit to do with some Indian and Pakistani ones! 😣 Facepalm There was this I did yesterday too.
Could be a case, which I've seen before, of a page with a similar name being 'hijacked' because a newby editor doesn't know how to start a new page, so they just change a 'John Smith' page to be about another 'John Smith' entirely. Yadukuha had content relating to 'Videha Municipality' (which is apparently Bideha, Dhanusa) dumped into it, for example. A lot of IP editors from that region don't seem to agree on the difference between a village and a town, or city, too. 220 of ^Borg 02:21, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rukum District has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Her Pegship (I'm listening) 02:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Pegship, I am pinging you here as I intend to ping a few others too. @CAPTAIN MEDUSA, SS49, and Raju Babu:, please correct me if I'm wrong:

Pegship, I am looking at your edits to Rugha, and I'm thinking you might have been thrown off by the outdated tenses. Rugha was a VDC in Rukum District of Rapti Zone, Mid-Western Development Region. The VDC by this name does not exist anymore, though it is likely there is an eponymous village that would not pass GNG or GEOLAND somewhere within the territories of the former VDC. Currently, the whole area (area, not a named place encompassing the area) is a part of Tribeni Rural Municipality, Western Rukum District, Karnali Pradesh.

So, my thoughts are (and it comes out of an almost complete ignorance regarding Wikipedia practices on the issue): the article should describe Rugha as a former VDC in former Rukum District, former Rapti Zone, former Mid-Western Development Region. Under this scheme, the template in question would still be relevant. The fact that the area is now under Tribeni of West Rukum, Karnali should be mentioned only as an afterthought. The template {{West Rukum District}} could still be included since that is where the area now falls under. Instead of the populated places category(I do not know if all geo articles must be in a populated places category), I would suggest Category:Former VDCs in Western Rukum District which would be a child of Category:VDCs of Rukum District. Stubsorting, I think, is fine as is, though, now that I think about it, something like "This article about a [former-VDC/historical-place/something-similar] in Karnali Pradesh of Nepal is a stub" might be better (That would be seven specific cats for some 4000 articles; not that stub-sorting is the most-pertinent of the updates those articles are missing right now).

Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I appreciate any education on this topic. I have been assigning stub templates and categories, but not usually editing the articles' content (figured I or someone else would get to that eventually). The "populated places" category is hit-or-miss - some district categories have one and some don't - and any re-arranging, renaming, or creation of categories such as you suggested would provide a great deal of clarity. If the Rukum and Nawalpuri District templates should still exist, I will withdraw the TfD, go on merrily stub sorting, and leave actual geography to those who know more about it. Cheers! Her Pegship (I'm listening) 16:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pegship, I think that might be best, at least for now. I have reverted Raju Babu's modification of the template, and will wait for them and hopefully others to join.

If you will withdraw the nomination, I will start a new discussion on standardising all district templates, along with exceptions. We do have a lack of clarity on what to do with the VDCs in other districts also; some districts templates seem to have deleted all evidence of prior divisions, while some had them moved to a historical subgroup last I checked. We don't seem to have the quorum of editors to establish consensus or implement them. That's why I have been reluctant to dive into anything major. I will formulate a proposal and go by the WP:SILENCE route if need be.

Thank you for your ongoing stub-sorting efforts. (You had reached the letter "D" last time my watchlist lit up ) Usedtobecool ☎️ 18:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Usedtobecool. I have created Template:Karnali-formervdc-stub, which might be useful. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 19:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Captain - I think a non-stub template might be more appropriate (like the district template currently under discussion). Stub types follow a specific pattern and process, and I can tell you that a VDC-level stub type is not currently needed for stub sorting purposes. The stub sorting project is currently re-sorting articles from zones into provinces, and after that we'll look at the numbers for districts. If you feel strongly about creating any kind of stub, I invite you to discuss it over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting. Thank you for your efforts, but I think Template:Karnali-formervdc-stub should be deleted. Her Pegship (I'm listening) 22:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings all! Pursuant to changes made in the administrative divisions of Nepal in 2015, and due to the very large number of geographic stub types thereof, the Stub sorting Project has created stub templates by province and district and is in the process of emptying the zone-geo-stub categories. (See the Proposals page for details.) I encourage anyone who's looking for a tedious but useful mission to help re-sort these stubs. If you'd prefer something just as useful but not quite as tedious, please feel free to update the contents of the articles, as the text still gives the old location in most cases. Cheers, Her Pegship (I'm listening) 15:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pegship, I did one district just now. I will be doing resorting for a while, when I come across the need, as I try and rate all unassessed articles in this WikiProject.

Great job with all this truly tedious stuff. I think you have covered all the bases with regard to Nepal-geo-stub for years to come. Thank you! Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. Some folks knit or do puzzles...I sort stubs. :D Her Pegship (I'm listening) 20:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

:D As long as you don't short stocks too. Usedtobecool ☎️ 21:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should do nothing about maps until reliable WP:THIRDPARTY sources do.

We seem to have jumped the gun already with Kalapani territory, which Wikipedia maps are showing coloured yellow. I don't know who made this decision and what sources they used. I was thinking of taking it to WP:NPOVN at some point, when Nepal began to amplify its claims even further. Our practice has generally been to colour the disputed areas as per the administering country. Only with regard to Kashmir do we use hatched areas, because THIRDPARTY sources do so. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As for the area, it doesn't matter particularly, as long as it is stated whether it includes claimed areas. We need to be judicious about it though. For instance, do we calculate population densities while including claimed areas but not their populations? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya3, I would just like the consensus figured out on all of these issues, whatever it may be. I have stopped reverting for the time being, as in the absence of others to back me up, I would be edit-warring against immediate local consensus in those articles.

These things are not solved in a day. For example, the China-Tajikistan border was altered in 2011 and I started changing the maps to reflect this on Wikipedia only in 2020 (following the CIA World Factbook). Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geographyinitiative, the immediate question is what to do with the driveby editors: leave their edits alone (I am sure when enough Indians become aware, they'll be here to swing it the other way), or keep reverting them however much they outnumber me by (what policy/consensus do I stand on while doing that?). Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion is to put dotted lines around territories claimed by a given country but not administered by that country following the way that Jammu and Kashmir maps are done. Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree, until RS cover it we should not.Slatersteven (talk) 11:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slatersteven, and what exactly would that mean? I am guessing we are not counting Nepalese and Indian newspapers. Are you saying that we should go with the old area as long as, for example, the CIA or the UN don't list the new area in their data, and disregard news altogether? Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only convention I'm aware of regarding disputed territories on maps is that used in the country infoboxes, which is to colour any claimed territory that the country doesn't actually control as light green instead of the regular dark green. As for other maps, I suspect it's mostly a case by case basis. Could you link to some of the new maps you've seen?

As for area, we shouldn't update it based on this single declaration, that's WP:RECENTISM and doesn't therefore reflect a consensus among sources. CMD (talk) 11:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chipmunkdavis, there was File:15-32-58-new-political-map-of-nepal-2052020112623-1000x0.jpg which seems to have been deleted. The government released this map;which is all I have seen, whatever filenames they may have been uploaded under. Kautilya3 has mentioned a map as well. Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That would mean that RS (I.E. third party independent sources), its is not just a question of reliability, but also of weight. No we should not disregard news, but wP:news is clear we also should not allow it to dictate content.Slatersteven (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the current Jammu and Kashmir maps are ideal. No colouring, no shading, no hatching. Just dotted lines around the claimed areas.

Usedtobecool, every day we revert dozens of Indian/Pakistani editors pushing their countries' brandings on the others' territories. Nepalese editors doing it is nothing new for us. What justification do we use? "Unsourced edit" is the easiest, because most such edits never bother giving a source or write edit summaries justifying their edits. If they give national sources, we demand WP:NPOV or WP:THIRDPARTY. Every Wikipedia editor is supposed to follow WP:NPOV. It doesn't matter what country they are from, or whether they are experienced or inexperienced, registered or unregistered. Note also that Wikipedia doesn't have any special policies for countries or governments. They are sources just like any other. If they make claims about themselves, they are just WP:SPS and have no value for Wikipedia. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya3, but the NPOV or SPS dispute would still come under valid content dispute, no? I was confident enough reverting when the edits were unsourced, but then they had government sources, then national papers, now Indian and international papers as well. So, I would need to point to a consensus to justify continued reversion after that. And WP:3RR still applies to me, even if I am on the side of the right (Sorry I am no practical experience with conflict). Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not our problem. The WP:BURDEN is on the editors making the changes to demonstrate WP:V and WP:NPOV. Since the Indian and Nepalese claims neutralise each other, how are they able to give priority to one over the other? It is their problem to demonstrate and convince us.

If we run up against 3RR, we ask for help from other editors at the project pages or NPOV editors we know. If they exceed limits, we request page protection. Once we bring it to the admin attention, they take care of things quite well. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We can also make judicious use of WP:In-text attribution. Nepal says X. India says Y. We state it and we are done. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, something like this needs to be standardized on all pages with the "New" map. The map used by the government of Nepal is non-neutral by definition and I think should not be used as per WP:NPOVN. For examples, maps that reflect the Indian government's territorial claims do not appear on the India page. There are edits being done to the Infobox as well, which counter template norms used by other countries, there is a discussion there too on disputed territories which was helpful to go through. I also think this map has no place in the infobox. Thanks Usedtobecool for putting this together. Redpandamoon (talk) 05:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image link Usedtobecool. I have nominated File:Nepal map 2020.jpg for deletion based on copyright.

In my experience waves of edits such as those pushing this new info will subside in time. The reason will no doubt vary per the edit being reverted. There will also be positive and constructive edits emerging from this event. Territorial disputes of India and Nepal can be expanded, and perhaps we might now even be able to create a map for it. CMD (talk) 13:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We recently had a preliminary discussion at #Nomination for deletion of Template:Rukum District on what to do regarding District templates. It seems to me, clarity on the subject would help going forward. I have looked at some, and:

1. For districts that exist now and did before, I like what GERNPL has done at {{Kathmandu District}} (diff).
2. For districts that no longer exist, we should list VDCs and municipalities of the time, and make no mention of the new ones; since the district was gone when the new system came in. {{Nawalparasi District}} is an existing example.
3. For new districts, we should list rural and urban municipalities and make no mention of the old VDCs or municipalities (if any). The old divisions were before their time, so they need not bother with them. {{Eastern Rukum District}} seems like the template to follow.
   Thoughts?
   Pinging SS49 who's been known to edit the templates. Pinging @CAPTAIN MEDUSA: from previous discussion, and procedural ping to pegship. Everyone feel free to ping anyone else who might have an interest in this area. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
   fixing ping to @Raju Babu:. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think VDCs should be listed only with the former two districts: Nawalparasi & Rukum. All other districts including four new districts shouldn't be listed former VDCs with it's templates because those VDCs are already a part of new formed Municipality/Rural Municipality. For example: Jalpachilaune was a VDC with 48 kmsq of area which had many Villages and the headquarter was in a remote village but now Jalpachilaune is just a small town (neighborhood) in Triyuga municipality. Now Jalpachilaune doesn't represent all of 48 kmsq of area. Now Jalpachilaune is a part of ward no. 16 in Triyuga. If anybody want to know about former VDCs he can check Former administrative units of Nepal. We do not use now former development regions, former zones and former VDCs--- 👤Raju💌 12:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned by Raju Babu, all former VDCs are now parts of either Rural or Urban municipalities so these former VDCs should not be listed in the district templates. Should list current municipalities and rural municipalities and district headquarters. ~SS49~ {talk} 12:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The templates' function is to link related articles together. We need a template to link the former VDCs. I think putting them into a historical section of existing templates would be just the right amount of work necessary. If consensus is reached against inclusion of former VDCs in the district templates, we will need separate sub-templates for each district. VDCs are a significant part of the history of any district, except the four new ones. So, I would favour including them in the existing templates, marking them properly as historical. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User talk:Gotitbro § Nepalese

 – ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:29, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you reverted my edits at Manisha Koirala. In that edit, I changed the word Neplaese to Nepali. I believe it should be Nepali. You said Nepalese is the standard term on enwiki, can you direct me to a discussion that led to this change (as being the standard term).

Prakash Sharan Mahat, former minister for foreign affairs of Nepal once said People who live in Nepal, we call them Nepali ... Let us start saying Nepali in English as well, instead of saying Nepalese [1] Here are few sources [2] Martin Chautari also uses Nepali [3] Even NRN USA uses Nepali. [4] [5] ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: "Nepali" is a recent trend affected by the Indo-Aryan demonym usage for Nepal (Nepali is more generally used for the language in English). Nepalese has been the standard adjective/demonym in English and on this Wikipedia since the beginning as is evident by the categories on the page itself. And I don't see a reason why this or any other page should be an exception to that. Gotitbro (talk) 12:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree with this. Even the The Kathmandu Post has been using Nepali for decades. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: This the current standard adjective form for Nepal here on enwiki and its precedent is evident by the myriad cats and titles related to it. You can disagree but the consensus for your change is not there. Gotitbro (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK! there might "not" be consensus. Let's talk about Koirala. The Media usage: Republica Nepali actress Manisha Koirala [6], The Rising Nepal Manisha Koirala is getting huge support from Nepali people, A book students in Indore disrupted the screening of a movie by the Nepali Bollywood actress Manisha Koirala [7] Outlook Manisha will live in Nepal and will mostly devote time to Nepali films.

Using Google: If you search for Manisha Koirala "Nepali actress", it bring 189,000 results. Manisha Koirala "Nepalese actress" brings 5,600 results. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are missing the point, leads use standard terminology and this article is not an exception to that; WP:GOOGLEHITS hardly matter here. Gotitbro (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is a different matter. This is not about AfD. The numbers matter because it shows that Nepali is widely used. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sidenote: Even the Wikipedia article about the people refers to them as "Nepalis" not Nepalese. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically didn't refer to that article as it has been the subject of multiple edit wars, disputes and moves. Changing of a demonym/adjective would require a sitewide consensus. Gotitbro (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsi Bhagat, Usedtobecool, Biplab Anand, Coolboi567, Learnerktm: Your thoughts? ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Talking about this with Wikimedians of Nepal members and I do personally agree with them, "Nepalese" is the standard English language term used formally wide across the nation such as in Nepalese passport, Nepalese rupee, etc. while "Nepali" is frequently used these days informally. Moreover, from the Nepali point of view, "Nepali" is correct, but from English point of view, "Nepalese" is preferred as it possesses the English language word syntax. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 04:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think cats on this project use "Nepalese", so new cats should follow that, and any movement toward "Nepali" would require a massive CFD or an RFC. That is just for consistency among cats, so there is no way that automatically translates into article space consensus in favour of "Nepalese". The two words are synonyms and are mostly interchangeable. I think it's not necessary to make an edit specifically to change from one to another unless it would be confusing or in error. If the majority of the sources use "Nepali" as the Cap'n claims is the case with Manisha Koirala, then that may be a case where switching to "Nepali" may be justified. If Gotitbro disagrees, I think standard WP:BRD for local consensus should be the way to go, in absence of any overriding global one.. Nepali politicians, just like any other, say all the things all the time, I don't think just that fact makes it official or correct. I think there is a general movement toward "Nepali" even in International media, but I am not basing that on any data. I am not aware of any guideline which would justify favouring one over the other, and if there were actually an attempt to get Wikipedia to favour one usage over another, I think the result would be something similar to datevar/engvar/citevar. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think "Nepalese" is correct in English language. "Nepali" is adjective/demonym in Nepali language. In Nepali language we say Japani for people from Japan but in English we say Japanese. Nepalese is English translation of Nepali. ~SS49~ {talk} 11:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first known use of "Nepali" to mean "Inhabitant of Nepal" goes back to 1882, according to Merriam-Webster. So, it's not true that "Nepali" is a neologism, or just a Nepali/Sanskritic word which is properly translated into English as "Nepalese". The -i suffix isn't something unheard of in English; there's Pakistani (is there Pakistanese?) and Azeri, and those two are just off the top of my head. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:00, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found this from The Associated Press. Apparently, they were confused when reporting the 2015 earthquake and asked a Nepali linguist.Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:10, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I think "Nepali" is dominant in the South Asia region at least, so one could always add a "Use Indian English" when they begin an article to run away with "Nepali". Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:10, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Formally we have to use "Nepalese" term instead of "Nepali". The Constitution of Nepal 2015^[1] says

Every Nepalese community residing in Nepal shall have the right to preserve and promote its language, script, culture, cultural civilization and heritage.

The Government of the United Kingdom uses Nepali:

The UK and Nepal have reaffirmed their strong friendship following a visit by Nepali Prime Minister Oli to the UK, and set out areas to deepen the relationship.

UK praises strong Nepal relationship following Prime Minister Oli’s visit ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BBC News will cost 860 million Nepali rupees [8]. New York Times Canadian Humanitarian Sentenced to 9 Years for Raping 2 Nepali boys [9]. USA Today Qatar says Nepali worker dies building World Cup stadium [10] ThePrint said a senior Nepali official who refused to be identified [11] The Kathmandu Post interested in learning about Nepali culture [12] Human Rights Watch Senior Nepali lawyers have raised objections to the lack of safeguards [13] U.S. Embassy in Nepal Keep the Nepali People Protected from the Novel Coronavirus [14] ReliefWeb A Survey of the Nepali People in 2017 [15] Nepali Times There was great hope among Nepalis [16] Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Nepal) the decades-long dream of Nepali people to have a constitution made [17] GOV.UK Nepal’s development efforts under the new polity. The MFA on behalf of the Government of Nepal appreciated DFID’s work to help the Nepali people ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

in case of a child born to a Nepali citizen woman married to a foreign citizen, sub-section (2) of Section 5 shall apply.

Nepal Citizenship Act, 2063 (2006) [18] ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found beautiful and worth skimming conversation going here. As for the words, both words are possibly interchangeable. However, Nepalese has been consistently used in most of the wiki articles of/related to Nepal. For the common understanding and commonness 'Nepalese' has been accepted. Although the word 'Nepali' is generally seen in current trends, Nepalese is frequently and mostly used. I don't see why this should be argued more as both the words have no dissimilar meanings.

More, the word Nepali will be accepted as this conversation will slightly lighten the issue.

Thankyou for the ping. Capt. Medusa :) 18:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo, Nd12052010 seems to have misunderstood how navboxes work, and has included the full code for a Pokhara template into articles such as Lamachaur, Pokhara, Amarsingh Chowk, and presumably all the others included in what I've now created as {{Pokhara}} navbox, which I made by lifting the code from Lamachaur, Pokhara. I hope what I've done is helpful, and I've fixed that one article, but there is still a lot of sorting out to be done, by this editor or helpful others. There are also a lot of spelled-out stubs, as if they;ve used "subst:Pokara-geo-stub", when stub templates should never be subst'd. Too late at night, here, for me to do any more now. I know there is a push to create many many articles on Nepal at the moment, but I hope new editors are being helped to understand how to do so. Good luck. PamD 23:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you PamD, I made some improvements to a few articles, as well as the geo-stub template and category. ​ The templates and cats require consensus at WP:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals before they get created, so they should not have been created at all. I have been having a hard time keeping up with the recent level of WPNEPAL page creations. I had found a few minor formatting issues before, and was fixing them as I went but nothing like this. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CAPTAIN MEDUSA, perhaps we need a WP:Nepal Chautari, the talk page of the 10,000 challenge page perhaps? Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Usedtobecool, Maybe we need to update the challenge, like writing a how-to guide for writing stubs/start. I think by redirecting users to here, they can get most of it, this page is watched many users. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CAPTAIN MEDUSA I was thinking more of a discussion/QA page more like the Teahouse or CVU/NPP schools specifically for new editors from Nepal. A bit friendlier than this page. Precisely because this page is the mainboard of the project and everyone is watching it, it's not suited to function as a training page or help desk. It doesn't have to be 10000's talk page, we could have a whole new project subpage for the purpose. Let's try it out for a couple of months; see if anyone shows up with questions. Of course I agree with your suggestion for a help page or a quick guide to creating the new articles or at the very least, a list of resources (help and PAG pages). I'll try to throw something together in the next couple of days... unless you beat me to it. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The same editor has been creating categories such as Category:Places of Pokhara, Category:Ward of Pokhara and Category:Chowks of Pokhara, with no parent categories. I've added a parent category to the first as at least a temporary fix (is it a useful category or not?) and proposed the other two for deletion, but Nepal editors might like to help out here. PamD 07:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The number of India-Nepal boarder related articles are growing with likely political motives and most likely increase. I think admins should set some guidelines on creation of such articles . eg. articles Gunji Village, Nepal, Draft:Valmiki Ashram.nirmal (talk) 01:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nirmaljoshi, not really in the job description for admins. These are mostly handled through usual processes. If it becomes too disruptive, admins can always invoke WP:ARBIPA as India is "broadly construed" in it. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Understood. nirmal (talk) 07:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that Asian art, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team[reply]

From 1 October to 31 December, Women in Red is running a virtual contest on Asian women. In November, this will coincide with Wikipedia Asian Month. We look forward to strong participation from all those interested in improving coverage of Nepalese women.--Ipigott (talk) 16:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was wondering if someone fluent (or at least fluent enough) in Nepalese could search for sourcing for Champa (novel). It's currently up for deletion and I have a feeling that the bulk of sourcing will not be in English and I'd like to make sure that if it's deleted (or kept), it would only be after a good search for sourcing. The author looks to be very notable, so I'd be surprised if there wasn't sourcing out there. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A complex RfC is going on, after a long bout of edit war. Uninvolved editors needed at the discussion. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 06:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A quick headsup: Yudhir Aacharya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has been busy moving lots of articles, on the basis of assertions about correct terminology. See my note at User_talk:Yudhir_Aacharya#Article_moves.

This is outside my area of expertise, so I don't know whether these changes are justified ... but it seems to me that such such widespread changes should not be without some discussion. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you BrownHairedGirl, I think they came here to move Province No. 5 that was officially named today. They went with Lumbini Province, which is inconsistent with the rest of our articles but objectively a superior choice I think. They likely noticed that the rest of the articles were using "Pradesh" and moved the ones they could find. It seems they are done, and I doubt they'll return. So, I'll revert rest of their moves, which, you're correct, should not have been done without discussion, as it requires an organised effort to update everything after any such moves. This will have the Lumbini Province as an odd one out for the time being. But considering the resources at our disposal vs the number of things that are urgent on WikiProject Nepal, I think that's ok. So, I have requested a speedy rename of the adjoining category, Category:Province No. 5 and its subs. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Usedtobecool. Good to know that you are on the case. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the confidence, BrownHairedGirl! My plan didn't work. I have withdrawn the speedies and started a RM to get it done the proper way once and for all (notice below this section). I have tried to lay out the context well enough that editors unfamiliar would also be able to participate, or at least give a general opinion if not a specific !vote. You are welcome too, if you'd like. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion to rename all articles on Nepali provinces from "Foo Pradesh" to "Foo Province" is underway at Talk:Bagmati Pradesh. Your input would be appreciated. Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please share your opinion on Gaunpalika of Nepal here.-- 👤Raju💌 16:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion on the talk page about a disputed sentence. Is it possible for members of this project to make a comment there? Aditya^{(✉ • ⚒)} 03:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me to complete this Template which is in need to attach with articles of Province No. 1

--- 👤Raju💌 13:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raju Babu,  Done Bada Kaji (talk) 14:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greetings,

I am looking to connect with any Nepalese Wikipedians interested in GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) articles on wikipedia. If any wikipedians are interested please connect with me on my wikipedia page to explore GLAM article editing collaborations. Arunram (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christianity in Nepal needs a thorough rewriting. It is currently entirely based on Christian missionary sources and is extremely slanted in favor of Christianity (even citing that Christians would constitute 10% of the population while according to census they are 1.4%). There is a user who guards the article impeding any modification and the addition of problem tags. Based on the nickname, he is the very same author of many of the cited sources, a Christian missionary, and thus has a strong conflict of interest.--37.161.136.19 (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, There is currently a discussion about the edit on the Gurkha page HERE and HERE, due to inaccurate mentions of India and other similar inaccuracies. They don't seem to act according to the clearly stated Wikipedia policies but rather act on their personal judgement. It'll be very beneficial if anyone could include what you think. Thank you. ---AWikiGenius (talk) 01:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiProject Nepal,

This article is in terrible shape and is almost without any sources if anyone wants to take it on as a writing project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers

• New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles, including Nepal related articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
• If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. --John B123 (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have created an article on Ram Saroj Yadav who is a minister of Physical Infrastructure from province no. 2 hich is presently in Draft. How can it be verified by speedy process? If it's possible, please help me do it as it shows it may take 5 month or more. Curious boy np (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Curious boy np, I have commented out the parts lacking inline citation because they should not be included per WP:BLP. Please feel free to reinstate them with it. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiProject Nepal,

This article has been the subject of an edit war that resulted in several editors being blocked. I have reverted to the last version before the edit war broke out but I do not know if everything that was removed in this reversion was appropriate. If someone who has a NPOV could look over this article, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:04, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Second oli cabinet and Third oli cabinet are not different and the only difference is they come under second premiership and third premiership respectively as mentioned above. So a section for third premiership in same article, Second Oli cabinet can address both. Even the national medias term this as cabinet reshuffle. Can we deny this? It can be termed as second term of same cabinet as all the ministers remained same and same ministers took oath. Even their article suggest no Third Oli cabinet!^[1] Can wiki deny this? Fifth Deuba Cabinet, 2021 mentions it's preceded by Second Oli cabinet. Second Oli cabinet says it's succeeded by Fifth Deuba Cabinet, 2021. Isn't it? Except this article, you may not find this awkward topic, Third Oli canet any where. For your clarification:-

What is a cabinet?

Answer:the committee of senior ministers responsible for controlling government policy.(as found in dictionary)

If group of ministers is same in both Second and Third term of Oli, how can they be represented by different articles?

Previously, I had a merger reqest on Wikiproject Nepal but none was interested to duscyss on this topic. This proves how much unnotable this topic is. Please someone create a deletion discussion here in the page Deletion shorting else proceed deletion to prevent wrong message being transmitted. 110.44.124.181 (talk) 19:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please help also to clean up the Draft:2021 split in the People's Socialist Party, Nepal for tone and NPOV. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Further input on Talk:People's Socialist Party, Nepal § Article Split/New article titled 2021 split in the People's Socialist Party, Nepal to be formed from a section. would be very welcome. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 11:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I request someone here to check the article. The major contributor to this article seems to be family member of subject of article. Its ok but no reference! why? Please help maintain this page. Maybe his son has made such changes withour reference. Ujjwal Jha, whos major contributor here is former Minister Jha's son. I hope, you understand this. This article seems story or advertising co tent. Nothing seems encyclopedic here from top to bottom. Hence, I request someone to make a productive edit here!Curious km (talk) 20:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The old Sadbhawana Council has broken infinitely many times. They were led by Rajemdra Mahato, Anil Jha, Anandi Devi, Laxman Lal Karna, Sarita Giri,etc. On every member, there was a party but unauthorized. Wikipedia has articles on them. Many of these parties had no any place in country politics or elections and they remained in shadow. Some of these splinter groups were unable to be registered at Election commission. This includes the Anandi Devi factions. These Sadbhawana Parties broke and meged almost every year till 2017. Hence, they are not clearly notable. Even see the view count if these articles to get a clear image. These articles lack proper citations. Please share your valuable views on Talk: Nepal Sadbhawana Party. Thank you!Curious km (talk) 20:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that Village Development Committee articles should be turned into village articles. For example, this Tauthali and add a sentence saying it was once a VDC. Any thoughts? Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 15:04, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that will work. A VDC is not the same as a village. There are usually many villages in a VDC. And all VDCs are notable per WP:NGEO but not all villages are. So, converting them to villages would reduce the articles' scope and make them non-notable. VDCs are a historical entity which are Wikipedia notable irrespective of current status. There is no reason to overwrite them. If there are notable villages, new articles can be created on them. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Can anyone who understands Nepalese take a look at Draft:Shiva Pariyar to see if it's notable? The subject has an article in newiki, but that doesn't always seem to grant notability here. Thanks! ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 09:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article at newiki just says that he was born in Sarlahi District and he has been singing for more than a decade. It also lists a couple of his songs and that's it. Clog Wolf _Howl 10:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the logo of wiki Project Nepal in one article which was published by me. I want know more about this Page.13:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Endrabcwizart (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello need feedback for publish this article. Link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sushma_Adhikari Endrabcwizart (talk) 13:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There already seems to be enough feedback on the draft's talk page. Clog Wolf _Howl 15:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Film Development Board seems to have published their film database online. [19] This can be used to verify film release dates and cast. They also have awards but they are very limited (only the recent ones are available). Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 21:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Ishwar Pokhrel, I'm not familiar with naming customs so is it Ishwar or Ishwor? The article I've linked uses both spellings and I just think for consistency's sake, he should be referred to by one name. A general Google search for either name returns hits to the same person, so I don't know which to go with. Which spelling is preferred or does it matter? Just curious. Thank you. Snickers2686 (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Snickers2686, Ishwar Pokhrel is to be preferred. It may be advisable to note that "Ishwar" is sometimes spelt "Ishwor" and "Pokhrel" "Pokharel" if you can find a non-clunky way to do it, but redirects should be enough if you can't. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important one!!! The article Gagan Thapa needs to be rewritten or improved! I ask someone here help doing that. The article needs to be reaccessed as well. Many references, maybe 118! Yes, a redirect from Gagan Kumar Thapa, his official name as to be made to this article.Bedbhandari23 (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bedbhandari23, Ok, Thank you for pointing out this problem. I will look after it. Fade258 (talk) 06:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Darjeeling for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 06:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone from this WikiProject mind taking a look at Dhanush Chandra Gautam and checking the dates in the article? The person who created the article seems to be using some type of the Vikram Samvat for the dates which might be OK per MOS:ERA, but there should be also some kind of conversion provided for readers to a more commonly used date format to improve understanding. At least one of the categories also seems to be screwed up a bit because of this since a person born in BS 1989 wasn't born in 1989 AD and shouldn't be placed in the category Category:1989 births. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly, better? Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thank you for taking a look at this Usedtobecool. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add Lalita Niwas Scam known as "Lalita Niwas land grab scam" is one of the biggest political-financial scam in Nepal. Constitutes grabbing of public lands of Lalita Niwas by some politically charged private parties.

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2022/01/12/why-case-filing-in-document-forgery-in-lalita-niwas-land-grab-scam-has-been-delayed

https://thehimalayantimes.com/kathmandu/police-probe-incomplete-district-attorney

https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/kathmandu-district-court-issues-arrest-warrants-against-130-individuals-involved-in-lalita-niwas-land-scam/

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/rod-signed-to-strengthen-cyber-bureau https://risingnepaldaily.com/main-news/lalita-niwas-scam-cib-submits-report-to-district-attorney

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/02/13/what-is-the-land-scam-that-has-shaken-the-government-s-seat-all-about

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/300-accused-face-charges-in-lalita-niwas-land-grab-scam

https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/cib-hands-over-investigation-report-on-multi-billion-worth-lalita-niwas-land-grab-scam-to-public-prosecutors-office/

https://theannapurnaexpress.com/news/arrest-warrant-issued-against-gachhadar-basnyat-3934

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/absconding-subedi-couple-arrested-in-capital

https://english.onlinekhabar.com/explained-what-is-lalita-niwas-land-controversy-all-about.html

https://risingnepaldaily.com/nation/district-attorneys-office-returns-lalita-niwas-report

https://www.aninews.in/news/world/asia/nepali-congress-obstructs-parliament-proceedings20200207224915/

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2022/01/06/baluwatar-land-scam-arrest-warrants-issued-against-300-individuals-for-document-forgery

https://www.msn.com/en-xl/asia/nepal/cib-hands-over-investigation-report-on-multi-billion-worth-lalita-niwas-land-grab-scam-to-public-prosecutors-office/ar-AASv5Zi

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/02/05/three-former-ministers-among-175-individuals-indicted-over-lalita-niwas-scam

https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/series-of-republica-investigation-on-lalita-niwas-land-scam/

https://devr.nagariknetwork.com/news/writ-petition-filed-at-supreme-court-against-ex-pms-nepal-bhattarai-for-their-alleged-involvement-in-lalita-niwas-land-scam/

https://english.onlinekhabar.com/from-the-kathmandu-press-monday-april-22-2019.html

https://thehimalayantimes.com/kathmandu/ciaa-summons-58-individuals-in-lalita-niwas-land-grab-case/

https://thehimalayantimes.com/kathmandu/list-of-86-persons-summoned-by-anti-graft-body-in-lalita-land-grab-case/

https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/58-linked-to-lalita-niwas-scam-get-7-days-to-appear-at-ciaa/

https://risingnepaldaily.com/nation/case-filed-against-175-individuals-including-four-former-ministers

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/commission-for-the-investigation-of-abuse-of-authority-summons-86-individuals-to-record-statements/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:1A00:B011:DE28:697D:A9D0:D76F:8654 (talk) 01:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the template is to be developed else not remain isolated. In opinion, let's use Infobox Nepalese political party removing template infobox political party from Nepalese political parties. It will be much helpful in long run. Someone experienced here needs to develop the infobox before doing this. For example: All Indian parties use Infobox Indian political party. 110.44.125.11 (talk) 08:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take a look at the links to the disambiguation page Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) shown at Disambig fix list for Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)? It is often unclear from the articles which link should be used.— Rod ^talk 10:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow editors! I found three articles on same party or with some relation! The contents of Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) are mentioned even in the article Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre). Well though I am unknown of what they all are related to, they seem same organisation. I feel either a merger is required else the content of article Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre) needs trimming. I see this was previously done by someone and got reverted by @Vif12vf:. Please share your healthy thoughs! Krish edits675 (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that Sikkimese cuisine, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

I have proposed the aforementioned merger, your views are welcomed at the discussion. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a current merge proposal regarding the political events in Nepal 2020-1, to which input would be much appreciated. The merge discussion can be found here Felix QW (talk) 07:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The disambiguation page All Nepal National Free Students Union has 16 incoming links. Those links should go to the correct articles, not to this disambiguation page. Unfortunately, I know nothing about Nepali politics. That is why I request your assistance in solving these links. The articles can be found here. Thanks in advance. The Banner talk 11:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Darjeeling/archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are considered to be the most reliable sources (no matter which language) for news and events in Nepal? —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 19:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can anybody provide a reliable source to settle once and for the question of Gopal Gurung's nationality citizenship or even his place of birth (currently listed as Darjeeling)? It was listed as Indian for a long time, which seemed reasonable based on birth in India, but people have repeatedly changed it to Nepalese without citing a source. I've been reverting it but finally realized that there isn't a source there to support a claim of Indian nationality either, so I've removed that. It would be nice to put an end to this back-and-forth with a decent footnote. Largoplazo (talk) 18:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your feedback would be appreciated at Talk:Gautama Buddha#Requested move 5 October 2022. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 11:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page which had been Gautama Buddha was unsuccessfully proposed for a change to Siddhartha Gautama, then successfully changed to The Buddha, and is now being proposed for a change to Buddha. Your input and expertise would be most welcome at: Talk:The_Buddha#Requested_move_25_November_2022 Best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 04:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can anybody look at the edits that I have added to Rastriya Swatantra Party? My changes have been reverted by two separate editors and I would like somebody else to take a took at it. The relevant discussion on this topic can be found at User talk:Wiki Master World#Rastriya Swatantra Party and User talk:PenGear#Rastriya Swatantra Party. I would appreciate any help. @Usedtobecool @Yeti Dai I know that both of you are old editors on Nepal related topics and I would appreciate any feedback. PenGear (talk) 05:12, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help to disambiguate links to Madhesi Jana Adhikar Forum, Nepal. There are over 100 articles which link to this dab page - shown here. Presumably most of the links should go to Madheshi Jana Adhikar Forum, Nepal or Madheshi Jana Adhikar Forum, Nepal (Loktantrik) but I am not expert enough to know which. Help appreciated.— Rod ^talk 09:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you see this users recent edits in 2022 Nepalese general election and all of his other edits so far, he/she is a clear fan of CPN UML and KP Oli and is hell bent on making all articles relatedto nepal politics glorify oli and UML party. Please stop and revert his edits. 138.25.4.69 (talk) 02:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedians! You are highly encouraged to apply for travel scholarship for Wikimedia Movement's largest gathering, Wikimania 2023. Wikimania 2023 will happen in Singapore and online from 16-19 August, 2023. There is a pre-conference on the 15th and a post-conference on the 20th. It is back on Asia since Hong Kong in 2013. Application deadline is on 5 February 2023 at 23:59 AoE. Regular registration will happen around May 2023. --Exec8 (talk) Exec8 (talk) 07:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all,

Please see Special:Contributions/Gunjan Raj Giri.

The user's account was created in 2015 but only became active in February 2023.

Could you possibly look into this and give some advice about their article creations?

User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance requested 15 Feb 2023, none given by 17 Feb 2023.--User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at WP:AN § Procedural quirk in WP:GS/CASTE. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 20:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Gangtok for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 18:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see some changes to be made in the article Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre), the ruling party of Nepal. The article seems to long while it lacks some information. While the party name has changed at various point of time, all those information are in same article. So I feel a senior editors needs to look into this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franked2004 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See my latest edits regarding duplicated page 78.0.30.114 (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recently added to the infoboxes for (at least some) Districts is this:

subdivision_type1 = [[List of regions of India|Region]]

which I thought might be about natural or historic regions of the Subcontinent, but no, it redirects to Administrative divisions of India. I respectfully question whether this was a good idea. —Tamfang (talk) 21:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thadi and Siraha District both say:

Thadi is one of the few towns which is a part of agreed route for Mutual Trade between India and Nepal.

with a link to the agreement, which appears to list twenty-six such crossings (plus air routes). Is there an article listing these? If so, it ought to be cited in the articles for the relevant towns (and perhaps districts). —Tamfang (talk) 21:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]