User talk:Laslovarga

Što se tiče naziva na hrvatskom jeziku, moja je ideja da imena svih mesta u Vojvodini budu napisana na svih 6 službenih jezika. Dakle, problem je što ja za neka mesta ne znam imena na rumunskom, rusinskom ili slovačkom, pa sam napisao ona imena koja znam. Kada dođe neko ko zna imena i na drugim jezicima, neka slobodno doda. Što se tiče onoga što želiš da dodaš u članak, slobodno to prevedi na engleski i dodaj (ja ću popraviti gramatiku i slično ako bude trebalo). Za ubacivanje slike postoji skroz levo opcija "Upload file": ide se na to, a posle se samo sa opcijom "Choose" pronađe fajl u računaru i ubaci (klikne se na dugme "Upload file"). PANONIAN (talk) 00:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC)1[reply]

---

Jedino mi nije jasno ovo: "Bukovina Székely are originally from Madéfalva (Siculeni) village, the county of Csik (Harghita)"

Zar su baš svi Sekelji Bukovine poreklom iz jednog jedinog sela??? To mi je nešto čudno. Jesi ti to dobro preveo? PANONIAN (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

---

Ok, popravio sam u članku to o poreklu Sekelja. Nije bilo tu jasno napisano da li su iz sela Madéfalva poreklom svi Sekelji Bukovine ili samo oni što su došli u Skorenovac. Pogledaj još jednom taj deo o poreklu Sekelja u članku, pa popravi ako nešto ne valja. Inače, primetio sam da si preko one prve slike snimio drugu (a meni se lično prva više sviđala). Ne znam da li znaš, ali u članak možeš staviti više slika. Drugu sliku samo snimiš sa drugim imenom i ubaciš je u članak kao i prvu, i onda obe budu tamo. PANONIAN (talk) 02:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

---

E, pošto sam video da si drugu sliku već ubacio pod novim imenom, onu prvu sam vratio na staru verziju i ubacio obe u članak. Nadam se da je ok? PANONIAN (talk) 02:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

---

U principu je praksa da kada se u neki članak stavi veći broj slika, da se one ubace u posebno poglavlje i od njih napravi galerija (što sam ja sad uradio u članku o Skorenovcu). Ako želiš da dodaš još slika, možeš ubaciti u tu galeriju. Inače, što se tiče toga šta bi još tamo mogao pisati, ne postoji neki šablon u vezi toga, jer ovde nema baš puno članaka o selima Vojvodine, a i oni koji postoje su uglavnom manji od ovog o Skorenovcu. Kod proširivanja članka dolazi u obzir sve što je vezano za selo, kao što si i sam rekao: istorija, običaji stanovništva, itd... PANONIAN (talk) 01:28, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

---

Ja dobro vidim ovu sliku što si ubacio:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Summer_Storm_in_Skorenovac.JPG

Ako je ti ne vidiš dobro, probaj da je opet ubaciš sa drugim imenom (to bi trebalo da reši problem). PANONIAN (talk) 01:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

---

Mislim da članku o Skorenovcu fali demografska sekcija, dakle koliko sam shvatio u tom selu su etnička većina Mađari, odnosno Sekelji, pa bi to trebalo i navesti (po mogućnosti navesti tačan broj i procenat svih brojnijih etničkih grupa koje žive u tom selu). Ja sam ubacio demografsku sekciju u članke o svim opštinama Vojvodine, ali za manja mesta kao što je Skorenovac, nemam podatke. PANONIAN (talk) 03:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Vidim da si kao uzor imao moju korisničku stranu i moj potpis, ali da li bi bar mogao da promeniš boju na njima, čisto da nemamo baš skroz isto. Da umesto font color=blue napišeš font color=read, ili font color=yellow. Ima velik broj boja koje bi mogao da staviš. :) PANONIAN (talk) 00:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Can I suggest to put some Wikipedia:Babel information to your User page? You can use this template on hu:User:Laslovarga @ hungarian Wiki too. --hu:Rodrigo 21:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Malo sam ti sređivao korisničku stranu. Ako ti se ne sviđa reci, pa ćemo popraviti. PANONIAN (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Da li bi mogao da dodaš mađarsko ime u ovaj članak: Banat Republic. PANONIAN (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

I u ovaj takođe ako možeš: Elayet of Temesvar. PANONIAN (talk) 23:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Mislim da bi mađarsko ime trebalo da se napiše i ovde: Baranya-Baja Republic. PANONIAN (talk) 02:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Nisam bio ja več Panonian. Luka Jačov 19:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kad sam prvi put vidio tvoj user page bio je nepostoječi template sh-5 koji ne postoji pa sam išo ispravit a i sam si dotad napiso da ti je hr materinji. Nije mi jasno zašto me napadaš. Luka Jačov 08:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zašto to onda uopče mi spominješ? Stvarno isti datum:-)?! KOje godine? Kaqa si razmišljanja imao pre 15 godina? Luka Jačov 14:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slučajno 15 jer si napiso 15 januara pa me to valjda navelo. Samo zadrti nacionalisti navode milijune razloga protiv (dok postoji 10 milijuna za). Da apsurd bude još veči večina Srba u Hrvatskoj izjasnila se da im je materinji jezik hrvatski a večina Hrvata u SiCg srpski. Mislim da je večina Hrvata a još više Srba svjesno da se radi o istom jeziku. Luka Jačov 15:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Koristiš li koji meseđer? Nisi se izjasnio u koju grupu ja spadam tvrdoglavih ili upornih;-)? Luka Jačov 16:17, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kuc-kuc, još mi nisi odgovorio:-). Luka Jačov 19:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I saw you had found the article about the Székelys of Bukovina. As you can see on the talk page the article was under a nationalistic attack some weeks ago but I hope it's over now. It would be great if you have time and energy to do research and contribute. I promised a section about culture but I'm quite busy with my work now. All in all: welcome here! Zello 07:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vidim da ti je Luka opet menjao korisničku stranu. Ja tu više neću da se mešam, reši to sam sa njim. :) Inače, ako opet budeš imao problem sa duplim nazivima mesta kao kod Ivanova, pogledaj ovo:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities%2C_towns_and_villages_in_Vojvodina

Tu postoje linkovi za sve te duple nazive kao Ivanovo (Serbia), Kula (Vojvodina), Vrbas (city), itd. I ne bi bilo loše da ako ubaciš neke nove slike da ih staviš u kategoriju:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Vojvodina_images

(Ja sam sve tvoje slike već stavio tamo, ali ako ih ubaciš još, možeš ih tamo staviti da bi imali lepu i kompletnu galeriju) PANONIAN (talk) 00:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

E da, i još nešto, da nemaš slučajno neku mapu kovinske opštine sa ucrtanim svim selima? Ako imaš, ja bih je mogao preraditi i napraviti od nje "public domain" sliku, koja bi se posle mogla ubaciti u članke o Kovinu i Skorenovcu i eventualne članke o tim drugim selima ako bi ih neko napisao. PANONIAN (talk) 01:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Ok si rasporedio slike kod Odžaka, uvek je bolje da jedna slika stoji na početku a ostale u galeriji. Inače pošto vidim da si ti radio te slike, predlažem ti da napraviš svoju ličnu galeriju slika. Nešto ovakvo:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Laslovarga/Images

I ja sam nedavno slikao Novi Sad, pa ću ovih dana da razvijem film i da ubacim te slike u članke o kvartovima Novog Sada, a napraviću i svoju galeriju slika.

Inače, mislim da mi ne vredi ta mapa iz 1930. Trebala bi mi mapa sadašnje opštine sa opštinskim granicama i ucrtanim selima. Ja na primer imam jednu veliku kartu u računaru na kojoj su opštine Srema, Južne Bačke i Zapadnog Banata, i onda sa te sečem delove i pravim posebne karte opština, kao što je ova recimo:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Pancevo.png

E sad, problem je što su na toj velikoj karti samo ovi delovi koje sam naveo, a samo pola kovinske opštine je na toj karti, što mi ne vredi, pa sam mislio ako slučajno imaš celu. Za sada ću da nacrtam te opštine Srema što ih imam na karti, a za ostalo moram tražiti nove karte po Internetu. Jednostavno ne volim članke koji nemaju mapu. :) PANONIAN (talk) 02:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Ma ok, ne moraš žuriti, ako ih slučajno nađeš pa javi. Kažem, prvo planiram da uradim te mape opština u Sremu, a to će trajati najmanje mesec dana, tako da se ima vremena za ostalo. :) PANONIAN (talk) 04:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Al nisi mi reko za messanger. Luka Jačov 00:27, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Nemaš ni ICQ, ni IRC, ni MSN ni Skype? Luka Jačov 00:41, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesi pročito koji moj članak? Koji ti je najzanimljiviji? Baš me zanima tvoj POV. Luka Jačov 00:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hm, mislio sam da napraviš galeriju slika koje si ti uradio, a ne onih koje si ubacio na Vikipediju, ali kako ti se više sviđa, tako uradi. :) PANONIAN (talk) 02:25, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Evo napravio sam i ja moju galeriju slika (ako te zanimaju slike Novog Sada):

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PANONIAN/Images

PANONIAN (talk) 03:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Ok, ubaci tu sliku u svoju zbirku sa naznakom uradio Panonian. Inače, što ne napraviš dve zbirke, jednu sa slikama koje si ti uradio, a drugu sa onima što si ubacio ili ti se sviđaju (ili ih samo u istoj zbirci podeliš na dva naslova). PANONIAN (talk) 23:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Thanks for uploading Image:Skorenovac Map 1.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. bluemask 07:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Skorenovac.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 15:58, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem sa onim slikama što si ubacio je što nisi naveo njihov izvor. I meni su ranije iz tog razloga obrisali dosta slika koje sam ubacio (zato sam i počeo da ubacujem mape koje sam ja crtao). Ako si ti autor neke slike, onda si ti taj koji daje pravo na njeno korišćenje, ali ako ubaciš sliku koju je napravio neko drugi, onda moraš da dokažeš da je autor slike saglasan sa tim da se ona koristi na Vikipediji. PANONIAN (talk) 02:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Thanks for uploading Image:Skorenovac_Map_4.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 14:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Pa ni ja se ne razumem baš previše u copyright, pitaj ovoga Carnilda koji bi tag mogao da staviš, objasni mu odakle ti slika i pitaj da li može ta slika da bude na Vikipediji. Možda ćeš je na kraju morati i sam napraviti. Ja sam na primer u članak o Novom Sadu prvo ubacio neke slike grada koje su posle obrisane jer nisu imale tag, i onda sam morao da sam slikam grad i ubacim moje slike. Problem je što se na Vikipediju ubacuju neke slike bez dozvole, čiji autori su počeli da tuže Vikipediju za povredu autorskih prava, i onda je Vikipedija počela da prilično vodi računa o tome. PANONIAN (talk) 23:19, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Pa pretpostavio sam da sam taj članak dobro napisao kad ga niko do sada nije menjao. :) Inače, ne smatram baš da je taj članak završen, jer bi sigurno trebalo mnogo više napisati u odeljku o kulturi, ali to ostavljam nekom ko se u to razume više od mene. Nisam znao ni da nabrojim sva sela sa mađarskom većinom, pa bi i to trebalo dopuniti. PANONIAN (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

E, samo ako znaš u članku o Vojlovici kako se sada zovu sela Giseladorf i Marienfeld pa da popraviš tamo linkove da bi vodili do relevantnih članaka. PANONIAN (talk) 01:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms----László (talk) 01:36, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Üdv! A segítségedre lenne szükségem. Írtam egy cikket a Délvidéki vérengzédekről, de PANNONIAN minduntalan kiforgatja és a cikk már-már arról szól, hogy a magyarok mind szemét nácik akik a szerbeket gyilkolták. Hol ott arról írok, hogy a jugoszláv partizánok 40000 ártatlan magyar embert mészároltak le. Kérlek segíts megmenteni a szócikket, és ne hagyd, hogy az ártatlan áldozatok nevét bemocskolják. A link: 1944-1945 Killings in Bačka HunTheGoaT 18:54, 29 September 2006 (CEST)

Pa vidim da te je HunTheGoaT kontaktirao (nažalost ne umem da čitam). Pazi, ja stvarno nemam ništa protiv Mađara, ali dečko insistira da koristimo brojke iz njegovog izvora od 40,000 hiljada ubijenih, a moj izvor (Politička istorija Vojvodine od Boarova) kaže da broj nije tačno utvrđen i da se procene kreću od 4,000 do 40,000 i da se broj od 20,000 uzima kao najtačniji, dok Dragomir Jankov (Vojvodina - propadanje jednog regiona) takođe pominje broj od 20,000. Mislim, da je zaista tačno utvrđeno da je ubijeno 50,000 nedužnih Mađara ja ne bih imao ništa protiv da piše samo taj broj od 50,000 tu, ali je problem što broj nikad nije tačno utvrđen, i ne razumem što dečko insistira samo na tom broju (zar je 20,000 ubijenih malo?). Evo predloži ti kompromisno rešenje za tu rečenicu ako želiš. PANONIAN (talk) 21:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image count is not the issue. Some pages have DOZENS of images. However, there is a significant difference between using an image to illustrate the article and simply creating a dumping ground for random images. I'm not saying that Ratkovo falls completely into that latter category, but certainly there's no need for more than one image in an article that is so small, and even if we used two or three images, there's no need for multiple images of the same cemetary. I hope this helps to clarify my concerns. Good luck, and happy editing! -Harmil 01:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Napisao sam tamo 20-25,000 (Bilo bi dobro da ako možeš navedeš izvor odakle taj broj od 25,000 - ime knjige, web sajta, bilo šta, da ne bude baš da to pišemo napamet). E, i još nešto, što se tiče članka Jermenovci, stvarno mi bode oči taj veliki prazan prostor tamo. Jel možeš umesto tog praznog prostora da napišeš neki tekst, o istoriji, kulturi, bilo čemu, samo da ne bude baš skroz prazan prostor. PANONIAN (talk) 02:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Šta je konkretno problem sa tabelom kod B. Brestovca? Kod mene izgleda dobro i na Internet Exploreru i na Operi. PANONIAN (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Napravio sam generalnu izmenu sadržaja u članku Skorenovac da bi članak bio kvalitetniji. Sadržaj kvalitetnog članka treba da bude osmišljen tako da glavne stavke u sadržaju sadrže podstavke koje će biti po svom sadržaju deo teme o kojoj govori glavna stavka. Primetio sam da si ti na primer stavio "History" kao podstavku u "Historical names of the village and region", a to u stvari ide obrnuto. :) E, i još nešto: pošto si napisao da ova slika nije iz Skorenovca, što si je onda stavio u članak? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kopja_fa.jpg PANONIAN (talk) 00:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inače, znam da će sada kad uporediš izmene članak izgledati iskasapljeno, ali jedino što sam menjao u tekstu je to što sam dodao u see also link do članka "List of places in Serbia" i slike "Skorenovac's Wineyard", "Meadow of Skorenovac", kao i mapu Skorenovca. :)) PANONIAN (talk) 01:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

E vidim da si stavio tabele o etničkom sastavu od 1910 do 2002, pa me nešto zanima: da li se ti podaci za 1910 odnose na današnju teritoriju opštine Pančevo? Pitam zbog toga što su opštinske granice 1910 bile malo drugačije nego sadašnje (mogu se videti ovde: http://www.talmamedia.com/map/hhcounty/images/megyek1/toront.gif ), a po podacima sa istog sajta (http://www.talmamedia.com/php/district/district.php?county=Toront%E1l), dobiju se malo drugačiji procenti etničkih grupa nego u tabelu koju si stavio. Znači, samo me zanima na koju se konkretno teritoriju odnose podaci iz tabele koju si stavio u članak? PANONIAN (talk) 03:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sredio sam malo te tabele u članku Pančevo, nego imam još jedno pitanje: da li u izvorima koje si gledao za etnički sastav opštine Pančevo postoje i podaci sa ranijih popisa pre tog iz 1910 (od 1869 do 1900)? Bilo bi zanimljivo videti i te podatke. PANONIAN (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Laslovarga, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Skorenovac Map 2.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Laslovarga/Images. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote to you question/request in your user talk on HU wiki but I don't know did you saw it and if you speak Shekely. Pietras1988 ^TALK 07:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. List of articles about Kurów in all languages is on http://kurow-wiki.openhosting.pl/wiki/U%C5%BCytkownik:Pietras1988/Interwiki_do_Kurowa but I haven't yet it in Shekely, so if you can do, you can do it on http://kurow-wiki.openhosting.pl/wiki/hu-sze:Kurow. Pietras1988 ^TALK 06:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear László, to create the picture gallery I just used a "model" (I ignore if one uses this term on English Wikipedia). You can find it here : fr:Modèle:Images. I guess that an adaptation will be necessery to employ it in your article. But if you click on "Modifier", you can get the source code of this model... I hope that this information will be usefull. Very kindly, --82.121.40.163 (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Aristote2 PS : Happy new year ![reply]

A tag has been placed on Vehcom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Goochelaar (talk) 09:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I deleted it because they are not in national costume in the picture.
• Azért töröltem mert nem népviseletben vannak.

Outesticide (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo László, I am glad to have found someone from Banat. I was born in the Vojvodina too. I have edited the article Ivanovo in the German wiki and I think I have taken some information from your feather. I am not that familar in handling the computer so I´d like you to do me a favor. 1) What does the abbreviation "N.D" mean in English? You have used it in the article Pancevo/Population and major ethnic groups in the municipality. I thought it stands for "Not Detectable" but now I am not sure anymore. 2) I have put some photos into the German article JABUKA and I would like to put them through to the English article, but I did not succeed. I would highly appreciate if you could try it for me. If you need any translation into German don´t hesitate in asking my. Best regards --Speidelj (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to the German admin --Martin Zeise ✉ there would not be any chance for a surviving of the article FK Plavi Dunav in the German wiki due to Nevezetesség/Notability. Do you think I still should try to start it?--Speidelj (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lazlo, pls have a look at Jabuka, diskussion-page. Is it posible to leave the article only to users, who are logged in? There is a user, who has changed his IP four times. Thanks--Speidelj (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. there is a way if users that are not logged in are behaving disruptive and reverting articles without discussion on the talk page, but, as you see, I discuss the issue with you and if you are affraid of discussion and want to shut me up, that is only your problem. As for my IP change, I already told you that my Internet provider is the one who change this IP number every time I log in to Internet. 212.69.4.119 (talk) 10:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You added fact tag to Jabuka article: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jabuka&diff=275203220&oldid=275181984 Please read this: http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:m5yUnACBSbAJ:www.sopancevo.org.yu/30-1-l+jabuka+stratiste&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2 quote: "Sa sigurnošću se može reći, da između 1660 – 1666. godine Jabuka nije postojala kao naseljeno mesto. Posle velike seobe Srba na ovim prostorima ponovo se naseljava srpsko stanovništvo zajedno sa delom makedonskih naseljenika. U doba Marije Terezije od 1763. a naročito 1765. i 1766. godine izvršena je nemačka kolonizacija Jabuke." - so, what would be the problem with the sentence that "Jabuka had been initially populated by Serbs"? 81.18.58.162 (talk) 23:59, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You deny that the settlement with Macedonians in Jabuka in 1945 took place as a pilot project by the Yugoslavian government. Nobody disagrees, that later Serbs settled down, after the first Macedonians went home and left their houses available. And meanwhile there is a Serbian majority in the village, no doubt. But if you would have your own discussion-page, we could continue the discussion at that page. That´s my opinion.--Speidelj (talk) 22:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jabuka#And_now and, can you please write there are you able to open this link and read these 3 sentences on that page? I would appreciate your help on this. thank you. 81.18.62.135 (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Laszlo, the link [Ivanovo] doesn´t aim to Ivanovo (Banat)----Speidelj (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking in the Serbian wiki for some football issues I was looking for, and I saw there a user with your name. Can I ask you if that is you? If it is, could you accept helping me, when I need (don´t warry, he, he, it is only ocasional questions) regading some football players, or their correct writting in Hungarian, or things like that? Anyway, I wanted to say hi, and send you regards, also offering myself to you if ever you need. Best regards!, :) FkpCascais (talk) 00:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

E bas mi je drago da smo u kontaktu. :) Evo ovako, video sam da ste na nasoj viki dosta clanaka uradili. Ja tamo uopste ne editujem, jer sve radim ovde, ali naravno odem tamo ponekad da vidim kad mi nesto konkretno treba. Ja sam dosta ovde clanaka radio upravo o nasem fudbalu i igracima, ali imam neke probleme. Recimo, fale mi kompletno svi podatci iz 90tih. Nemam ekipe ni igrace koji su igrali u klubovima. Isto tako sam jedno vreme trazio sve strance u nasem fudbalu, pa sam sasvim slucajno otkrio da je bilo i "pravih" (mislim, ne Vojvodjanskih) Madjara kod nas (primeri, József Dzurják, János Borsó ili Pal Dardai) pa neznam da nije mozda bilo jos nekih? Ili nekih drugih stranaca, recimo u Vojvodjanskim klubovima, kao Brazilci u Subotici 1990-te, mozda je bilo jos? Vidim da se razumete dosta u nas fudbal, pa verujem da mozete sigurno puno da mi pomognete. A naravno da i na mene mozete uvek racunati. Srdacan pozdrav! FkpCascais (talk) 04:49, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sta bi? Gde ste? :) FkpCascais (talk) 01:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dobro, samo da vas pozdravim! FkpCascais (talk) 02:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Currently, the WikiProject Hungary is quite down with only a very limited active users, but I'd like to add some spirit into it. I think you might be interested in the project, therefore I would like to invite you to take a look at this proposal, share your opinion and participate in the life of WikiProject Hungary. You might also join a task force – from your contributions and user page it looks like you would be a great reinforcement for the Hungarian diaspora one – and by a cooperation of dedicated users we can further develop the task force related articles, the task force itself and by so the whole WikiProject Hungary as well. If you have questions, ideas or thoughts you can add them on the talkpage of the proposal, here (I watchlist your talkpage) or you can contact me directly on my talk page. Your words are very welcomed!

Thank you!

Kind regards, Thehoboclown (talk) 11:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and sorry for the late response! Um, I just wanted to say that I'm glad you are interested in the project. Now I wish you to enjoy every moment of your vacation and if you're back we count on you! :)

Regards, Thehoboclown (talk) 09:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Laslovarga, I'm contacting you because we need some Hungarian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hu.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Hungarian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 01:06, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of former Serbian exonyms in Vojvodina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vojlovica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Laslovarga! Do you remember Ivanovo? Now I need your help. Šaip Kamberi ^{[citation needed]} [[1]]. I think, the article is endowed with sources. Pls see also [[2]], and [[3]]

Thank you very much, pozdrav--Špajdelj (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I notice you made reference to Ljubisa Gajic's Prvenstva Jugoslavije u Atletici when writing an article a few years ago at sr:Јулије Бауер. Do you have a copy of this book still? I have tried to locate a copy of this book but have failed. I would like to create the article for List of Yugoslav records in athletics and I believe this book has the data to complete this. Would you be able to help at all? If you do have it, possibly you could take some photos of the relevant pages and sent the photos to me? Thanks SFB 00:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You'll need to provide a reliable source for his date/year of death. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Odessa_clashes

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1976–77 Magyar Kupa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page István Kovács. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, László. To a certain extent, it depends on the country, and for Romania, we’ve taken the approach to have articles about communes only, not villages. That’s consistent with WP:GEOLAND: “populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable” — but villages in Romania do not have legal recognition.

It also makes more sense structurally: it’s better to have the entire commune and its two villages discussed in one place rather than send the reader to three separate pages.

I do understand that the villages have different histories, but I would simply say it’s more logical and coherent to keep things together, like at Coronini, Bazna and Sânandrei. I hope this explanation makes sense. — Biruitorul ^Talk 21:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Author Laslo Varga.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Imre Kiss (footballer, born 1957) article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 17:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Thank you for clarification. On a web I have found this and this. I found that on French Wiki about him under Liens externes. Laslovarga (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]