User talk:Thehoboclown
User | Talk | Contributions (count) | The Lab | Articles created |
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
|
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Tijana Krivacevic. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Tijana Krivacevic has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NW (Talk) 05:07, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Re: Water polo
[edit]Hey, it´s no problem. It´s a thing of 10-15 seconds and thanks for the kind words. Regards Kante4 (talk) 14:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Re: Handball
[edit]I thought because they were replaced i remove them but it´s no problem if you want to re-add them... Kante4 (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sure, go ahead. Kante4 (talk) 22:33, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Gabriella Szűcs
[edit]Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Gabriella Szücs a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Gabriella Szűcs. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you.
DYK for Heidi Løke
[edit]On 10 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Heidi Løke, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Heidi Løke won a gold medal with the Norwegian team at the 2010 European Women's Handball Championship, and was also selected into the all-star team as best pivot of the tournament? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Szilvia Ábrahám for deletion
[edit]The article Szilvia Ábrahám is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szilvia Ábrahám until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kayau Voting IS evil 12:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK nomination of József Éles
[edit]Hello! Your submission of József Éles at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! It's just a minor issue: one paragraph in need of sourcing. Thanks! —David Eppstein (talk) 04:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK for József Éles
[edit]On 30 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article József Éles, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Hungarian team handball player József Éles was top scorer at the 1993 World Championship? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Ágnes Farkas
[edit]On 8 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ágnes Farkas, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ágnes Farkas was selected Hungarian Handballer of the Year in both 2001 and 2002? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
DYK for István Csoknyai
[edit]On 5 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article István Csoknyai, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that at the end of his career as a professional handball player in 2005, István Csoknyai had won more national league and cup titles than any other Hungarian player? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I agree that you have a point, but until there is an article on the men's side this is OK to redirect to the only relevant article. When there is an article for the men, this can become a disambiguation page for the two. Peridon (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Bojana Radulović
[edit]On 9 June 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bojana Radulović, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Hungarian handballer Bojana Radulović has been selected IHF World Player of the Year twice, in 2000 and 2003? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Use of File:Győri ETO KC logo.png
[edit]I've removed the uses you had of this image in 2009–10 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) and 2009–10 Nemzeti Bajnokság I (Women's handball) as well as removing the rationales you added to the image for those uses. The reason is that this type of use is a failure of WP:NFCC #1. It is not necessary nor desired to include the logo of a team when it is mentioned in the prose of an article. Since the text already includes mention of the winning team, including the logo is redundant and is a failure of the replaceability clause of WP:NFCC #1. Please do not restore the image to this use, and please do not use non-free images in this manner. If you have questions about this, please ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:37, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]Hey, yeah i saw the deletion message and "discussion" earlier but did not know what i thought about it. But now i guess they should be deleted as the qualifying phases for both (men and women) are not that long and are just a bracket and 4 matches (handballboxes), so it is not much to scroll. I thought about maybe having an extra article for the group phase and then later for the knockout stage as that uses a lot of space like we saw last year. Just 1 not one for each group or round. What you think about that? I will write my comment at the deletion entry now. Kante4 (talk) 14:53, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, forget that one. ;) Will do now. Kante4 (talk) 15:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 17:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Bgwhite (talk) 17:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Andrea Farkas
[edit]On 24 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Andrea Farkas, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that handball goalkeeper Andrea Farkas won Olympic bronze and silver medals with the Hungarian national team? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andrea Farkas.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
EHF
[edit]Hey, i thought about it too and don´t know especially what to do. Less matches is/was the reason to keep it in the main article, but like you said the info would be in one page. I would lean to a subarticle but i ask you too, what would you do? Kante4 (talk) 10:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, i think it´s better to make a subarticle. I was very busy the last weeks and had no time to create all EHF "things", yesterday i had a free day, and so i started it all. As i speak, i got to leave again. ;) Let´s try to keep the article up-to-date and make it look good. Kante4 (talk) 09:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- I think we should add the Round 1 and 2 from the women´s article in the same article and call it group stages, just two groups, no need for another subarticle. Kante4 (talk) 23:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yep, you got it right. Your name is also good and maybe even better as you pointed out. Kante4 (talk) 13:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the words, i also corrected a misstake from my side. I´m glad you look over the articles and feel free to edit it when something is wrong, you want to add something or the results. Kante4 (talk) 16:10, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yep, you got it right. Your name is also good and maybe even better as you pointed out. Kante4 (talk) 13:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- I think we should add the Round 1 and 2 from the women´s article in the same article and call it group stages, just two groups, no need for another subarticle. Kante4 (talk) 23:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Great job ...
[edit]exanding the Vas article. Well done.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
[edit] New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Thehoboclown! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
DYK for Beáta Siti
[edit]On 5 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Beáta Siti, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during her active career, Hungarian handball player Beáta Siti obtained victories in the EHF Cup, the EHF Cup Winners' Cup and the EHF Champions League? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beáta Siti.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks for this article Victuallers (talk) 12:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Coat of arms of Transylvania
[edit]Hi! I am contacting you in connection with this edit. I checked your source and I can't find the respective information in the pdf file. Can you please give me the exact quote and the corresponding translation, per WP:NONENG? Thanks in advance AksamitSK (talk) 12:42, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- I see someone already contacted you :). I had the same question. Greetings Adrian (talk) 13:09, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. Greetings. Adrian (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Szeged 2011 logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Szeged 2011 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In Budapesti Korcsolyázó Egylet, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Sándor Szalay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Városligeti Műjégpálya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sándor Szalay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Roma in Hungary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
EHF 2012
[edit]Hey, maybe we should use this: Template:Angola squad 2011 World Women's Handball Championship, looks better for the squad templates. ;) I mean the numbers and then just the last name... Kante4 (talk) 20:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, i changed it for the Hungary one. I have no problem with different squad templates. ;) Kante4 (talk) 20:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe at some points, if not then not. :) Thanks for the kind words, really appreciate it. You are one of the users you can really work with. Kante4 (talk) 20:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Ivan Čupić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Kosárlabda
[edit]Szia!
Részben rátapintottál a lényegre, amellyire az időm engedi, annyira igyekszem majd fejleszteni a magyar kosaras oldalakat, de sajnos elég rég óta tervben van ahhoz, hogy bármit ígérjek. Ha kérdésem lesz, köszönettel élek majd a felajánlással.
Üdv --vampeare (talk) 16:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Women's EHF Cup Winners' Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Viborg and Olga Levina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Szemeredi's citizenship
[edit]- Az megvan már, hogy mire költi ezt a rengeteg pénzt? (A díjjal 6 millió norvég korona, vagyis 800 ezer eurónak és 1 millió dollárnak megfelelő összeg is jár.)
- Ez jó kérdés... nem tudom, ezt az összeget itthon adóztatják-e - mert a Nobel- és a Széchenyi-díj sem adóköteles -, de ha igen, és a magyar hatóságokkal meg tudnék állapodni, akkor pont annyit, amennyit Amerikában adóznék mint kettős állampolgár, annyit jótékonysági célokra felajánlanék itthon.
http://www.nepszava.hu/m/articles/article.php?id=532617 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.241.14.117 (talk) 15:15, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 21:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Adrian (talk) 21:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 21:58, 3 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Adrian (talk) 21:58, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 05:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Adrian (talk) 05:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Project Organisation
[edit]Szia ! Gondolom, könyebb lesz magyarul beszélgetni :) Nagyon köszönöm a meghívást ! Örülök, hogy részt vehetek egy ilyen projektben ! Beírtam a felhasználónevemet a "Sports and games" kategóriába. Szívesen segítek, főleg, abban, ami a kézilabdát illeti :) Ha jól értettem, akkor meg kell várni, amig öt felhasználó jelentkezik egy kategóriába ? Még egyszer, köszönöm,
Üdv,
Worldhandball.com
[edit]Szia ! Nem tudom, hogy be vagy-e jelentkezve a worldhandball.com-on, de anélkül most már nem lehet megnézni a meccsriportokat, illetve a góllövőlistákat. Én be vagyok, szóval onnan frissítettem az információkat. Szívesen, és akkor várom a jelzésedet :)
Üdv,
Mikimami (talk) 14:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Meghívás
[edit]Szia. Jelenleg az érettségim van folyamatban, szóval mostanság nincs szinte semennyi időm. Annyit tudok ígérni, hogy amint végzek, beszállok az érdemi munkába. Addig leginkább csak figyelni fogok.
Ja, köszönöm a meghívást :) Madridista92 (talk) 20:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for invitation, I will be with you guys shortly, just now I am on vacation----László (talk) 19:01, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Move tab
[edit]Hi. Alexandrina Barbosa is Alexandrina Cabral Barbosa and Silvia Navarro (handballer) is Silvia Navarro Gimenez in Spanish. Can you please do it for me? http://www.eurohandball.com/ec/cl/women/2011-12/player/520306/AlexandrinaCabral+Barbosa and http://www.eurohandball.com/ec/cl/women/2011-12/player/504260/SilviaNavarro+Gimenez say the same. Thank you. Mar24vale (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
[edit]- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- News and notes: Two new Wikimedia fellows to boost strategies for tackling major issues
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
Meghívás
[edit]Szia! Köszönöm a meghívást! Amint befejezem az angol wiki-n, amit akarok, utána jövök magyarra is! --Canysp (talk) 20:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Ja jó bocsi! :) Tényleg félreértettem. Ha jelentkezem, akkor mi lenne pontosan a feladatom? Cikkek bővítése, ellenőrzése és karbantartása? Segítségnyújtás kezdőknek? Amúgy én is gondoltam már rá, hogy cikkeket ki kellene bővíteni, csak tényleg elég sok van, ami igen gyér! Szép napot! Üdv! --Canysp (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Oké! Rendben van megpróbálok megtenni minél többet! :) Én sem vettem még részt semmi ilyenben, ba majd meglátjuk...sajnos van, hogy napokig nem tudok netezni, mert kórházban dolgozom és van 24 órás ügyeletem, nem is egy (sajnos)! De megpróbálok minél többet megtenni! Üdv! --Canysp (talk) 15:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
Help to set up a task force
[edit]This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hello!
I was about to set up the Sports and games task force for the WikiProject Hungary, but did not manage to work out, how to set the Template:WikiProject Hungary. Although on the template's site it looks all okay, when added to for example Talk:Tímea Babos, it went all wrong and the task force slipped below the main project. Could anyone tell me what is wrong or help to fix it and make the template correct? Thanks in advance! — Thehoboclown (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, I suggest that you ask this question at Village pump (technical). Pine✉ 08:59, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! – Thehoboclown (talk)
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
[edit]- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- News and notes: Editors want most funding for technical areas, while widespread ignorance of WMF board elections and chapters persists; voting still live on Commons best picture
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three requests for arbitration, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
WikiProject Hungary – Sports and games task force tagging
[edit]Hello. Per your request, since the bot's issue is basically resolved, I'm asking you to make a request at User:Hazard-Bot/Requests. In this way, it can be easily tracked. Hazard-SJ ✈ 03:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Done. Thehoboclown (talk) 10:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
[edit]- Special report: Springer's misappropriation of Wikimedia content "the tip of the iceberg"
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three requests for arbitration
- Technology report: To support or not to support? IPv6, and how best to serve non-Wikimedia wikis
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
[edit]- Investigative report: Is the Requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
License tagging for File:Székely Himnusz.ogg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Székely Himnusz.ogg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
[edit]- Op-ed: A call for editorial input in developing new Creative Commons licensing
- News and notes: "Mystical" Picture of the Year; run-up to Wikimania DC; RfA reform 2012
- In the news: Wales enters extradition battle; Wikipedia's political bias
- Recent research: Edit war patterns, deleters vs. the 1%, never used cleanup tags, authorship inequality, higher quality from central users, and mapping the wikimediasphere
- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
[edit]- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- Op-ed: Representing knowledge – metadata, data and linked data
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
[edit]- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
- News and notes: Russian Wikipedia protest blackout; E3 team and new tools; Wikitravel proposal bogged down
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
- Arbitration report: Three cases, Carnildo desysopped
- Technology report: Optimism over LastModified and MoodBar, but change in clock time causes downtime
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
[edit]- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- Wikimania: Young chapter shows experience beyond its years
- News and notes: WMF enacts reforms at Wikimania; main page redesign; 4 millionth article milestone
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Featured content: Takes flight
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
[edit]- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- Wikimania: Young chapter shows experience beyond its years
- News and notes: WMF enacts reforms at Wikimania; main page redesign; 4 millionth article milestone
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Featured content: Takes flight
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
The Signpost: 23 July 2012
[edit]- From the editor: Signpost developments
- Op-ed: The future of PR on Wikipedia
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
- News and notes: Chapter head speaks about the aftermath of Russian Wikipedia shutdown
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics
- Featured content: When is an island not an island?
- Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans
- Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South
- Recent research: Conflict dynamics, collaboration and emotions; digitization vs. copyright; WikiProject field notes; quality of medical articles; role of readers; best wiki paper award
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Technology report: Talking performance with CT Woo and Green Semantic MediaWiki with Nischay Nahata
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
[edit]- Op-ed: The Athena Project: being bold
- News and notes: FDC portal launched
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
The Signpost: 13 August 2012
[edit]- Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden
- News and notes: Bangla-language survey suggests the challenges for small Wikipedias
- Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dispute Resolution
- Featured content: On the road again
- Arbitration report: Youreallycan request for arbitration
- Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit
The Signpost: 20 August 2012
[edit]- Op-ed: Wikimedians are rightfully wary
- News and notes: Core content competition in full swing; Wikinews fork taken offline
- In the news: American judges on citing Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Land of Calm and Contrast: WikiProject Korea
- Featured content: Enough for a week – but I'm damned if I see how the helican.
- Technology report: Lua onto test2wiki and news of a convention-al extension
The Signpost: 27 August 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Tough journey for new travel guide
- Recent research: New influence graph visualizations; NPOV and history; 'low-hanging fruit'
- Discussion report: Sidebar and main page alterations; Recent Deaths; Education Program extension
- WikiProject report: From sonic screwdrivers to jelly babies: WikiProject Doctor Who
- Featured content: Wikipedia rivals The New Yorker: Mark Arsten
- Technology report: Just how bad is the code review backlog?
The Signpost: 03 September 2012
[edit]- Op-ed: Dispute resolution – where we're at, what we're doing well, and what needs fixing
- News and notes: World's largest photo competition kicks off; WMF legal fees proposal
- Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror
- Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation?
The Signpost: 10 September 2012
[edit]- From the editor: Signpost adapts as news consumption changes
- Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial
- Op-ed: Fixing Wikipedia's help pages one key to editor retention
- News and notes: Researchers find that Simple English Wikipedia has "lost its focus"
- In the media: Author criticizes Wikipedia article; Wales attacks UK government proposal
- Discussion report: Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Momento extensions
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fungi
- Featured content: Not a "Gangsta's Paradise", but still rappin'
- Technology report: Mmmm, milkshake...
Disambiguation link notification for September 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kristina Franić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Your warning for Iadrian yu
[edit]Hello Thehoboclown,
Although I fully understand that Iadrian yu's contributions to the English Wikipedia may have been causing you a lot of frustration and chagrin, I have to note that what he did at Marosvásárhely and Komárom was not vandalism. For this reason, we can't treat him as a vandal. What he has been doing in Wikipdia is POV pushing at best. He has a strong opinion on Hungarians ,for example : see this edit summary here, or see here what he voted for. And in addition, at least 50% of his contributions to the project is that he keeps watching out for what Hungarian users just happen to edit ,in order to appear at the same place to represent his well-known counter opinion there. But we still need to recognise that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia open for everyone to edit. And a lot of people edit it with a very different cultural background.--Nmate (talk) 10:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- I am sorry but I just saw this message. Although Nmate thinks this, that is not the reason for anybody else to think like this about me. What he is trying to do here is ridiculous. Adding this diffs to present me as some sort of a person with "strong POV" is wrong. I hope this diffs speak for themselves. You were right to correct me, maybe not as a Vandal, but that doesn`t matter. I sincerely forgot about the result when we talked about and edited the problematic article. When you corrected me I did`t edited that again. I hope that when we cooperate in the future that can be done as it was until now. Greetings. Adrian (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 September 2012
[edit]- From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook
- News and notes: Tens of thousands of monuments loved; members of new funding body announced
- WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force
- Featured content: Go into the light
- Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6
Talkback
[edit]Message added 04:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hazard-SJ ✈ 04:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 October 2012
[edit]- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
- News and notes: Independent review of UK chapter governance; editor files motion against Wikitravel owners
- Technology report: WMF and the German chapter face up to Toolserver uncertainty
- WikiProject report: The Name's Bond... WikiProject James Bond
- Featured content: Mooned
The Signpost: 08 October 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Education Program faces community resistance
- Discussion report: Closing RfAs: Stewards or Bureaucrats?; Redesign of Help:Contents
- WikiProject report: Ten years and one million articles: WikiProject Biography
- Featured content: A dash of Arsenikk
- Technology report: The ups and downs of September and October, plus extension code review analysis
The Signpost: 15 October 2012
[edit]- In the media: Wikipedia's language nerds hit the front page
- Op-ed: AdminCom: A proposal for changing the way we select admins
- News and notes: Chapters ask for big bucks
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemicals
- Featured content: Second star to the left
- Technology report: Wikidata is a go: well, almost
The Signpost: 22 October 2012
[edit]- Special report: Adminship from the German perspective
- News and notes: Wikimedians get serious about women in science
- Arbitration report: War declared over Malleus Fatuorum
- WikiProject report: Where in the world is Wikipedia?
- Featured content: Is RfA Kafkaesque?
- Discussion report: Good articles on the main page?; reforming dispute resolution
- Technology report: Wikivoyage migration: technical strategy announced
The Signpost: 29 October 2012
[edit]- News and notes: First chickens come home to roost for FDC funding applicants; WMF board discusses governance issues and scope of programs
- WikiProject report: In recognition of... WikiProject Military History
- Featured content: On the road again
- Technology report: Improved video support imminent and Wikidata.org live
- Recent research: WP governance informal; community as social network; efficiency of recruitment and content production; Rorschach news
The Signpost: 05 November 2012
[edit]- Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
- News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?
- Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs
- Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads
- Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka
The Signpost: 12 November 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
- WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil
- Featured content: The table has turned
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly
The Signpost: 19 November 2012
[edit]- News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in
- Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question
- WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles
- Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect
- Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"
The Signpost: 26 November 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain
- Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons
- WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
- Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation
- Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries
The Signpost: 03 December 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments announces 2012 winner
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; standardize version history tables
- WikiProject report: The White Rose: WikiProject Yorkshire
- Featured content: The play's the thing
- Technology report: MediaWiki problems but good news for Toolserver stability
Notification
[edit]Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 23:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, though it seems it's already settled. Thehoboclown (talk) 17:06, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 December 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Wobbly start to ArbCom election, but turnout beats last year's
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Human Rights
- Featured content: Wikipedia goes to Hell
- Technology report: The new Visual Editor gets a bit more visual
EHF 2014
[edit]Hey, long time no talk. ;) Can you also add the 2014 logo as it was presented today/yesterday by the EHF, can't link it diretly somehow? Good work on the 2012 article and looking forward to the expansion. More refs from eurohandball.com should come by the night/tomorrow. Kante4 (talk) 22:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Enough for the moment it is, i say. But, same for me here... Hmmm, will have a look tomorrow or during the holidays. Kante4 (talk) 22:59, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, no rush. ;) Thnks and same for you, always good edits i noticed. Kante4 (talk) 23:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 December 2012
[edit]- Op-ed: Finding truth in Sandy Hook
- News and notes: Arbitrator election: stewards release the results
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes
- WikiProject report: WikiProjekt Computerspiel: Covering Computer Games in Germany
- Featured content: Wikipedia's cute ass
- Technology report: MediaWiki groups and why you might want to start snuggling newbie editors
Warning?
[edit]Why you warn me? Why you including places with Serb majority into category "Hungarian communities in Vojvodina"? That is clearly inaccurate category. You should add into that categori articles about villages where Hungarians are in majority. 77.105.57.115 (talk) 18:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- According to which English-language source one place where Hungarians are not in majority can be described as "Hungarian community"? If you describe Serb communities as "Hungarian communities" then you confuse readers who might think that Hungarians are in majority there. Why you do not want to include into this category actual villages with Hungarian majority? 77.105.57.115 (talk) 18:17, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- If "Community means a group of people" then how a village or municipality is community? Anyway, it is not correct that term "Hungarian communities" means that "these places have considerable Hungarian population". "Hungarians communities" means that these places are exclusively or predominately Hungarian communities. If you had aim to create category for "places which have considerable Hungarian population", why you didn't named that category like this? Name that you choose for that category was/is misleading if you didn't had aim to describe "exclusively or predominately Hungarian communities". Moreover, you included into this category articles like Inđija where only 1.93% Hungarians live? That is not even a place with "considerable Hungarian population". I propose that you add your category into articles about all these villages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarians_in_Vojvodina#Settlements_with_Hungarian_majority In that way, category will not be misleading. I already included some of these villages into new category and I didn't removed category from articles about places with Hungarian majority. However, inclusion of places with Serb majority into misleading category is a problem. 77.105.57.115 (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- I do not know anything about Turkish communities in Germany, but if categories about one country are not categorized accurately, it doesn't mean that same should be done with categories of other countries. Also, if you warn me about revert warring why you behave like this by yourself? You are obviously disruptive user. I now included all villages with Hungarian majority in your category and I see no reason to include any other settlement there. Moreover, most settlements of Vojvodina are populated by many ethnic groups which make even more misleading to describe such settlements as exclusively "Hungarian communities". Please stop your revert warring and disruptive behavior. 77.105.57.115 (talk) 19:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- I will repeat: when speakers of English language read term "Hungarian communities" the first thing to which they would be associated are "exclusively or predominately Hungarian communities". I doubt that anybody would interpret term "Hungarian community" as a place with "84.87% Serbs, 3.83% Croats, 1.95% Yugoslavs and 1.93% Hungarians" (and you included article about such place into category "Hungarian communities", see Inđija again). If we speak about POV, you obviously have POV approach to this because, for some reason, you want to make false impression to Wikipedia readers so that they think that these places have Hungarian majority. If you really want to improve these articles then you should have same approach to all ethnic groups in all these settlement. For example, following your logic, Inđija could be categorized as "Communities in Vojvodina with Serb majority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Croat minority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Yugoslav minority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Ukrainian minority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Hungarian minority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Montenegrin minority". Only in such case we would have accurate name for categories and NPOV approach. We should also define what is a "sizable minority"? 40% 30% 20% However, I also think that it is stupid that we create such categories for all ethnic groups because most places in Vojvodina have minorities and if we follow your approach that "sizable minority includes 1% of population" then most places of Vojvodina would be included into most ethnic categories. What would be purpose of that anyway? 77.105.57.115 (talk) 19:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- Fine, then I propose name of new category: "Category:Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Hungarian minority (5-49%)". 77.105.57.115 (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- I will repeat: when speakers of English language read term "Hungarian communities" the first thing to which they would be associated are "exclusively or predominately Hungarian communities". I doubt that anybody would interpret term "Hungarian community" as a place with "84.87% Serbs, 3.83% Croats, 1.95% Yugoslavs and 1.93% Hungarians" (and you included article about such place into category "Hungarian communities", see Inđija again). If we speak about POV, you obviously have POV approach to this because, for some reason, you want to make false impression to Wikipedia readers so that they think that these places have Hungarian majority. If you really want to improve these articles then you should have same approach to all ethnic groups in all these settlement. For example, following your logic, Inđija could be categorized as "Communities in Vojvodina with Serb majority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Croat minority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Yugoslav minority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Ukrainian minority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Hungarian minority", "Communities in Vojvodina with sizable Montenegrin minority". Only in such case we would have accurate name for categories and NPOV approach. We should also define what is a "sizable minority"? 40% 30% 20% However, I also think that it is stupid that we create such categories for all ethnic groups because most places in Vojvodina have minorities and if we follow your approach that "sizable minority includes 1% of population" then most places of Vojvodina would be included into most ethnic categories. What would be purpose of that anyway? 77.105.57.115 (talk) 19:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- I do not know anything about Turkish communities in Germany, but if categories about one country are not categorized accurately, it doesn't mean that same should be done with categories of other countries. Also, if you warn me about revert warring why you behave like this by yourself? You are obviously disruptive user. I now included all villages with Hungarian majority in your category and I see no reason to include any other settlement there. Moreover, most settlements of Vojvodina are populated by many ethnic groups which make even more misleading to describe such settlements as exclusively "Hungarian communities". Please stop your revert warring and disruptive behavior. 77.105.57.115 (talk) 19:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- If "Community means a group of people" then how a village or municipality is community? Anyway, it is not correct that term "Hungarian communities" means that "these places have considerable Hungarian population". "Hungarians communities" means that these places are exclusively or predominately Hungarian communities. If you had aim to create category for "places which have considerable Hungarian population", why you didn't named that category like this? Name that you choose for that category was/is misleading if you didn't had aim to describe "exclusively or predominately Hungarian communities". Moreover, you included into this category articles like Inđija where only 1.93% Hungarians live? That is not even a place with "considerable Hungarian population". I propose that you add your category into articles about all these villages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarians_in_Vojvodina#Settlements_with_Hungarian_majority In that way, category will not be misleading. I already included some of these villages into new category and I didn't removed category from articles about places with Hungarian majority. However, inclusion of places with Serb majority into misleading category is a problem. 77.105.57.115 (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2012
[edit]- News and notes: Debates on Meta sparking along—grants, new entities, and conflicts of interest
- WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire
- Featured content: Battlecruiser operational
- Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
[edit]- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
- Interview: Interview with Brion Vibber, the WMF's first employee
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?; Wales accused of Kazakh corruption
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
[edit]- Op-ed: Meta, where innovative ideas die
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
DRN Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Novi_Sad.2C_Novi_Kne.C5.BEevac.2C_Srbobran.2C_Temerin
[edit]Hi, I am Wikishagnik a new Volunteer to DRN. I noticed that none of the talk pages in the articles listed in this DRN have any discussion about Categories. This is a necessary first step before we can take this case up for discussion in the DRN. Can you give some Wikilinks for the places where this discussion took place? -Wikishagnik (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
[edit]- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual photo competition, new grant scheme
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style, accessibility and equality
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
[edit]- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention; Sue Gardner's op-ed; Women of Wikipedia
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! – WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
[edit]- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles: catalysts, trends, and applications
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun – WikiProject Norway
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 February 7#Ethnic categories related to Vojvodina
[edit]G'day. I don't know if any existing category addresses the concerns expressed there by User:Peterkingiron. Could you give a view? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 21:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for drawing my attention on this! – Thehoboclown (talk) 21:52, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Szabolcs Szöllősi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gyula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2013
[edit]- Op-ed: An article is a construct – hoaxes and Wikipedia
- News and notes: UK chapter governance review marks the end of a controversial year
- In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute
- Discussion report: WebCite proposal; request for adminship reform
- WikiProject report: Just the Facts – WikiProject Infoboxes
- Featured content: A lousy week
- Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters
Orphaned non-free media (File:Ehfcuplogo.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Ehfcuplogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miskolc Ice Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multi-purpose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 February 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit
- In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press
- WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines
- Featured content: Featured content gets schooled
- Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings
Hello,
Sorry for reverting your restored information but the Romanian ice rink had a cost of 10-12 million of euros and was opened 4 years later. So the price should have been higher and it was. Also, I am posting for you outside photos of the 2 locations to see there is a difference of architecture between them.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0f/J%C3%A9gcsarnok.jpg http://www.looms.ro/filesystem/images/big/patinoarul-olimpic-brasov-vedere-exterioara.jpg
With all the respect, Hobo, Miskolc Ice Hall looks cheaper. At least from outside. And your ice rink doesn't hold/include a cube.
Moreover, Gazeta Sporturilor belongs to the Intact Media Group, own by Dan Voiculescu. His television Antena 3 is linked to the USL the rival part of PD-L. So the article on tolo.ro (the blog of Cătălin Tolontan, GSP editor) is political and not correct I've explained you why. First, because there is a difference between the two constructions. Secondly, because of subjectivity.
I also remember a same style comparison between the big of stadium of Bucharest and the stadium from Frankfurt. Gazeta Sporturilor mentioned incorrectly that a train station was included in the price of the German construction and it was not.
So do you understand now why I did that? I expekt objectivity from you and the present Romanians don't need to suffer because of the past mistakes. Both Romania and Hungary did many but we move on. I just hope you are not an extremist who wants to expose this. I know it was written by Romanian/s but it is political and false.
Myerge (talk) 21:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hey!
- Politics and other stuffs has nothing to do with Wikipedia. The paragraph is well referenced and objective, thus there is no reason to remove it. If you think a source is unreliable or so, feel free to go to the Reliable sources noticeboard and follow the instructions. Until those sources aren't proven unreliable, they should remain, and your action of removing the paragraph is considered vandalism. Please, refrain from such actions. As I see, you are a newcomer, so I suggest to find areas you like or you are good in, and edit in those and get familiar with the rules. You may also consider to be adopted by an experienced user, who can help you in the first steps. Don't be afraid of editing, however, be careful. Start with small edits, and once you get more experienced you can make it to the level. At all, one thing is sure: removing a whole paragraph based on some unproven ideas is not the best way to start. Thehoboclown (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 February 2013
[edit]- News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year
- In the media: Former WMF board member creates "Wikipedia Corporate Index" for Fleishman-Hillard PR agency
- Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers; EPOV instead of NPOV
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization
- WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload
- Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'
- Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
[edit]- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger; new writers
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal: watershed moment?; plus code review one year on
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- Interview: Meeting in the middle: Wikipedia and libraries
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- WikiProject report: Making music with WikiProject Composers
- Arbitration report: Another arbitrator resigns; Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule" for July rollout
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
- Recent research: "Ignore all rules" in deletions; anonymity and groupthink; how readers react when shown talk pages